Literature DB >> 26058727

Utility of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry Expression Pattern as a Surrogate of BRAF Mutation Status in 154 Patients with Advanced Melanoma.

Michael T Tetzlaff1, Penvadee Pattanaprichakul2, Jennifer Wargo3, Patricia S Fox4, Keyur P Patel5, Jeannelyn S Estrella1, Russell R Broaddus1, Michelle D Williams1, Michael A Davies6, Mark J Routbort5, Alexander J Lazar1, Scott E Woodman6, Wen-Jen Hwu6, Jeffrey E Gershenwald3, Victor G Prieto1, Carlos A Torres-Cabala7, Jonathan L Curry8.   

Abstract

Successful BRAF inhibitor therapy depends on the accurate assessment of the mutation status of the BRAF V600 residue in tissue samples. In melanoma, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis with monoclonal anti-BRAF V600E has emerged as a sensitive and specific surrogate of BRAF V600E mutation, particularly when BRAF V600E protein expression is homogeneous and strong. A subset of melanomas exhibit heterogeneous labeling for BRAF V600E, but our understanding of the significance of heterogeneous BRAF V600E IHC expression is limited. We used next-generation sequencing to compare BRAF V600E IHC staining patterns in 154 melanomas: 79 BRAF(WT) and 75 BRAF (including 53 V600E) mutants. Agreement among dermatopathologists on tumor morphology, IHC expression, and intensity was excellent (ρ = 0.99). A predominantly epithelioid cell phenotype significantly correlated with the BRAF V600E mutation (P = .0085). Tumors demonstrating either heterogeneous or homogeneous IHC expression were significantly associated with the BRAF V600E mutation (P < .0001), as was increased intensity of staining (P < .0001). The positive predictive value was 98% for homogenous IHC expression compared with 70% for heterogeneous labeling. Inclusion of both heterogeneous and homogeneous BRAF V600E IHC expression as a positive test significantly improved IHC test sensitivity from 85% to 98%. However, this reduced BRAF V600E IHC test specificity from 99% to 96%. Cautious evaluation of heterogeneous BRAF V600E IHC expression is warranted and comparison with sequencing results is critical, given its reduced test specificity and positive predictive value for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E; Immunohistochemistry; Melanoma; Next-generation sequencing; Sensitivity; Specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26058727      PMCID: PMC4515190          DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  30 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of somatic mutations from next generation sequencing of 241 melanomas: a road map for the study of genes with potential clinical relevance.

Authors:  Junfeng Xia; Peilin Jia; Katherine E Hutchinson; Kimberly B Dahlman; Douglas Johnson; Jeffrey Sosman; William Pao; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Immunohistochemistry as a quick screening method for clinical detection of BRAF(V600E) mutation in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Qiongrong Chen; Chunjiao Xia; Yunte Deng; Mingwei Wang; Ping Luo; Changming Wu; Junqiu Yue; Na Fang; Manxiang Wang; Shaozhong Wei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-23

3.  Comparison of next-generation sequencing mutation profiling with BRAF and IDH1 mutation-specific immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Kausar J Jabbar; Rajalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Rajesh R Singh; Rashmi Goswami; Ken D Aldape; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Mark J Routbort
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Intrapatient homogeneity of BRAFV600E expression in melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander M Menzies; Trina Lum; James S Wilmott; Jessica Hyman; Richard F Kefford; John F Thompson; Sandra O'Toole; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Prospective immunohistochemical analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Thiel; Monica Moza; Soili Kytölä; Arto Orpana; Tiina Jahkola; Micaela Hernberg; Susanna Virolainen; Ari Ristimäki
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations.

Authors:  Michaela Angelika Ihle; Jana Fassunke; Katharina König; Inga Grünewald; Max Schlaak; Nicole Kreuzberg; Lothar Tietze; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Reinhard Büttner; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A mutant BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemical assay: correlation with molecular mutation status and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fiona Day; Andrea Muranyi; Shalini Singh; Kandavel Shanmugam; David Williams; David Byrne; Kym Pham; Michelle Palmieri; Jeanne Tie; Thomas Grogan; Peter Gibbs; Oliver Sieber; Paul Waring; Jayesh Desai
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Beyond BRAF(V600): clinical mutation panel testing by next-generation sequencing in advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Alan E Siroy; Genevieve M Boland; Denái R Milton; Jason Roszik; Silva Frankian; Jared Malke; Lauren Haydu; Victor G Prieto; Michael Tetzlaff; Doina Ivan; Wei-Lien Wang; Carlos Torres-Cabala; Jonathan Curry; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Russell Broaddus; Asif Rashid; John Stewart; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Rodabe N Amaria; Sapna P Patel; Nicholas E Papadopoulos; Agop Bedikian; Wen-Jen Hwu; Patrick Hwu; Adi Diab; Scott E Woodman; Kenneth D Aldape; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Kenna R Shaw; Gordon B Mills; John Mendelsohn; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kevin B Kim; Mark J Routbort; Alexander J Lazar; Michael A Davies
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Immunohistochemistry with the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody: impact of pre-analytical conditions and concordance with DNA sequencing in colorectal and papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Katerina Dvorak; Birte Aggeler; John Palting; Penny McKelvie; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Paul Waring
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.306

10.  Validation of the VE1 immunostain for the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma.

Authors:  Michelle V Pearlstein; Daniel C Zedek; David W Ollila; Amanda Treece; Margaret L Gulley; Pamela A Groben; Nancy E Thomas
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.587

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular and immunohistochemical diagnostics in melanoma].

Authors:  B Schilling; K G Griewank
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  Immunohistochemistry Innovations for Diagnosis and Tissue-Based Biomarker Detection.

Authors:  Narittee Sukswai; Joseph D Khoury
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Integrative Analysis Identifies Four Molecular and Clinical Subsets in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  A Gordon Robertson; Juliann Shih; Christina Yau; Ewan A Gibb; Junna Oba; Karen L Mungall; Julian M Hess; Vladislav Uzunangelov; Vonn Walter; Ludmila Danilova; Tara M Lichtenberg; Melanie Kucherlapati; Patrick K Kimes; Ming Tang; Alexander Penson; Ozgun Babur; Rehan Akbani; Christopher A Bristow; Katherine A Hoadley; Lisa Iype; Matthew T Chang; Andrew D Cherniack; Christopher Benz; Gordon B Mills; Roel G W Verhaak; Klaus G Griewank; Ina Felau; Jean C Zenklusen; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Lynn Schoenfield; Alexander J Lazar; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Sergio Roman-Roman; Marc-Henri Stern; Colleen M Cebulla; Michelle D Williams; Martine J Jager; Sarah E Coupland; Bita Esmaeli; Cyriac Kandoth; Scott E Woodman
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 4.  Updates in Therapy for Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Bhavana P Singh; April K S Salama
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Combining molecular and immunohistochemical analyses of key drivers in primary melanomas: interplay between germline and somatic variations.

Authors:  William Bruno; Claudia Martinuzzi; Bruna Dalmasso; Virginia Andreotti; Lorenza Pastorino; Francesco Cabiddu; Marina Gualco; Francesco Spagnolo; Alberto Ballestrero; Paola Queirolo; Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci; Paola Ghiorzo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-14

6.  Heterogeneity and frequency of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma: Comparison between molecular methods and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  William Bruno; Claudia Martinuzzi; Virginia Andreotti; Lorenza Pastorino; Francesco Spagnolo; Bruna Dalmasso; Francesco Cabiddu; Marina Gualco; Alberto Ballestrero; Giovanna Bianchi-Scarrà; Paola Queirolo; Federica Grillo; Luca Mastracci; Paola Ghiorzo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  Prospective evaluation of two screening methods for molecular testing of metastatic melanoma: Diagnostic performance of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry and of a NRAS-BRAF fully automated real-time PCR-based assay.

Authors:  Audrey Vallée; Marie Denis-Musquer; Guillaume Herbreteau; Sandrine Théoleyre; Céline Bossard; Marc G Denis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  BRAF Mutation Analysis in Primary Acral Melanoma of 41 Cases from South of Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sari Aslani; Akbar Safaee; Mozhgan Akbarzadeh Jahromi; Leila Karami
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2021-07-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.