Literature DB >> 23159390

Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with node-negative gastric cancer invading the muscularis propria and subserosa (pT2-3N0M0 stage).

Chang-Ming Huang, Hong-Mei Wang, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Jun Lu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To explore the impact of tumor size on outcomes in patients with pT2-3N0M0 stage.
METHODOLOGY: ROC curve analysis was used to determine the appropriate cut-off value for tumor size in 115 patients of pT2-3N0M0 stage gastric cancer. Based on this cut-off value, patients were divided into two groups. The five-year overall survival (OS) rates in the two groups were compared according to the independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Using this cut-off value of 3.7cm, 62 patients had large-sized tumors (LSTs, tumor size >3.7cm) and 53 had small-sized tumors (SSTs, tumor size <3.7cm). Patients with LSTs had a significantly lower five-year OS rate than those with SSTs (60.7% vs. 88.4%, p=0.000). Depth of tumor invasion, histological type and tumor size were independent prognostic factors. In patients with pT2N0M0 stage tumors or pT2-3N0M0 stage patients with undifferentiated type tumors, five-year OS rates were significantly lower for LSTs than for SSTs (p<0.05 each).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size is a prognostic factor in patients with pT2-3N0M0 stage. Especially for pT2N0M0 stage gastric cancer and pT2-3N0M0 stage gastric cancer with undifferentiated type tumors, the prognosis was poorer in patients with tumor size >3.7cm than that in patients with tumor size <3.7cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23159390     DOI: 10.5754/hge12733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of Survival for Patients with Neoadjuvant-Treated Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Derek J Erstad; Mariela Blum; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Jaffer A Ajani; Paul F Mansfield; Brian D Badgwell; Naruhiko Ikoma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Clinical Implication of the Width of Subserosal Invasion in T3N0 Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamura; Mifuji Tomioku; Kazuhito Nabeshima; Eiji Nomura
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Large tumor size is a poor prognostic factor of gastric cancer with signet ring cell: Results from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Authors:  Liyuan Zhou; Weihua Li; Shaoxin Cai; Changshun Yang; Yi Liu; Zhizun Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic-Related Risk Factors of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Qian Wang; Qing Tian; Changwen Bo; Na Li; Sujing Zhang; Peishun Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Comparison between superficial muscularis propria and deep muscularis propria infiltration in gastric cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wei-Han Zhang; Du He; Dan-Ni Chen; Ting-Ting Li; Xin-Zu Chen; Kun Yang; Kai Liu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian Kun Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.