Literature DB >> 23159265

The impact of clinical stage on prostate cancer survival following radical prostatectomy.

Matthew K Tollefson1, R Jeffrey Karnes, Laureano J Rangel, Eric J Bergstralh, Stephen A Boorjian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical stage has been incorporated into multiple risk stratification models for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. However, the independent prognostic value of this variable remains open to debate. In this study we evaluated the association of clinical stage with death from prostate cancer in men who underwent radical prostatectomy and assessed for changes in its prognostic value over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 14,842 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1970 and 2008 without having received preoperative hormone or radiation therapy. Postoperative disease recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the association of clinical stage with outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 5,725 (38.6%) men were classified as having cT1 tumors, 8,160 (55.0%) cT2 tumors and 957 (6.4%) cT3 disease. On univariate analysis clinical stage was significantly associated with postoperative biochemical recurrence, systemic progression and death from prostate cancer (p <0.001 for each). Moreover on multivariate analysis clinical stage was significantly associated with death from cancer for patients treated before (1.45, p = 0.006) and those treated during (1.96, p <0.001) the prostate specific antigen era. Furthermore, the incorporation of clinical stage into contemporary risk stratification improved the prediction of cancer specific survival (c statistic 0.782 without and 0.802 with clinical stage).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical stage is significantly associated with systemic progression and death from prostate cancer. Inclusion of this variable in multivariate prediction models improves the prediction of systemic progression and cancer specific survival.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23159265     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer risk stratification with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Daniel J Margolis; Nima Nassiri; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Chen-Lu Liu; Qian Chen; Sheng-Chao Shao; Shuang-Qing Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Nuclear MTA1 overexpression is associated with aggressive prostate cancer, recurrence and metastasis in African Americans.

Authors:  Steven J Dias; Xinchun Zhou; Marina Ivanovic; Michael P Gailey; Swati Dhar; Liangfen Zhang; Zhi He; Alan D Penman; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Anait S Levenson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predicting side-specific prostate cancer extracapsular extension: a simple decision rule of PSA, biopsy, and MRI parameters.

Authors:  Piotr Zapała; Bartosz Dybowski; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Tomasz Lorenc; Agnieszka Powała; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Marek Gołębiowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Clinical stage provides useful prognostic information even after pathological stage is known for prostate cancer in the PSA era.

Authors:  Maxine M Chen; Jaquelyn L Jahn; John R Barber; Misop Han; Meir J Stampfer; Elizabeth A Platz; Kathryn L Penney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The efficacy and utilisation of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it change the surgical dissection plan?

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Ömer Aytaç; Numan Cem Balcı; Haluk Kulaksızoğlu; Fatih Atuğ
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Reduced Connexin 43 expression is associated with tumor malignant behaviors and biochemical recurrence-free survival of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Hui-Jun Chen; Shao-Hao Chen; Xue-Yi Xue; Hong Chen; Qing-Shui Zheng; Yong Wei; Xiao-Dong Li; Jin-Bei Huang; Hai Cai; Xiong-Lin Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

9.  Applied anatomy of pelvic lymph nodes and its clinical significance for prostate cancer:a single-center cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jia-Jun Chen; Zai-Sheng Zhu; Yi-Yi Zhu; Hong-Qi Shi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Signature Panel of 11 Methylated mRNAs and 3 Methylated lncRNAs for Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jiarong Cai; Fei Yang; Xuelian Chen; He Huang; Bin Miao
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.