BACKGROUND:Exercise training reduces adiposity and risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the combined effects of habitual free-living physical activity and aerobic training on waist circumference, weight, fitness, and blood pressure in postmenopausal women are unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of habitual physical activity levels during aerobic training on weight, waist circumference, fitness, and blood pressure. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of an RCT. Original data collected April 2001 to June 2005 and analyzed in 2012. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women in a supervised exercise trial. INTERVENTION: Women (n=325) were randomized to 4, 8, or 12 kcal/kg per week of aerobic training or a control group for 6 months. All outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up. Changes in dependent variables within each training group were evaluated across tertiles of pedometer-determined habitual physical activity outside exercise training sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in waist circumference and weight. RESULTS: Reductions in waist circumference were significantly greater with higher steps/day accumulated outside exercise training compared to lower levels in the 4 (high: -4.8 cm vs low: -1.4 cm, p=0.03); 8 (high: -4.2 cm vs low: -0.4 cm, p=0.03), and 12 kcal/kg per week groups (high: -4.1 cm vs low: -0.7 cm, p=0.05). For all groups, p-trend≤0.03. A trend was observed for greater weight reduction with higher steps/day in the 4 kcal/kg per week group (p-trend=0.04) but not for the other exercise doses. No effects were observed for blood pressure or fitness measures (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women, higher habitual physical activity while participating in aerobic training was associated with greater reductions in central adiposity, and was supportive of weight loss compared to lower levels.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Exercise training reduces adiposity and risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the combined effects of habitual free-living physical activity and aerobic training on waist circumference, weight, fitness, and blood pressure in postmenopausal women are unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of habitual physical activity levels during aerobic training on weight, waist circumference, fitness, and blood pressure. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of an RCT. Original data collected April 2001 to June 2005 and analyzed in 2012. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women in a supervised exercise trial. INTERVENTION: Women (n=325) were randomized to 4, 8, or 12 kcal/kg per week of aerobic training or a control group for 6 months. All outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up. Changes in dependent variables within each training group were evaluated across tertiles of pedometer-determined habitual physical activity outside exercise training sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in waist circumference and weight. RESULTS: Reductions in waist circumference were significantly greater with higher steps/day accumulated outside exercise training compared to lower levels in the 4 (high: -4.8 cm vs low: -1.4 cm, p=0.03); 8 (high: -4.2 cm vs low: -0.4 cm, p=0.03), and 12 kcal/kg per week groups (high: -4.1 cm vs low: -0.7 cm, p=0.05). For all groups, p-trend≤0.03. A trend was observed for greater weight reduction with higher steps/day in the 4 kcal/kg per week group (p-trend=0.04) but not for the other exercise doses. No effects were observed for blood pressure or fitness measures (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women, higher habitual physical activity while participating in aerobic training was associated with greater reductions in central adiposity, and was supportive of weight loss compared to lower levels.
Authors: Gary O'Donovan; Andrew Owen; Steve R Bird; Edward M Kearney; Alan M Nevill; David W Jones; Kate Woolf-May Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-01-07
Authors: Prabu David; Janet Buckworth; Michael L Pennell; Mira L Katz; Cecilia R DeGraffinreid; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: William E Kraus; Joseph A Houmard; Brian D Duscha; Kenneth J Knetzger; Michelle B Wharton; Jennifer S McCartney; Connie W Bales; Sarah Henes; Gregory P Samsa; James D Otvos; Krishnaji R Kulkarni; Cris A Slentz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ole J Kemi; Per M Haram; Jan P Loennechen; Jan-Bjørn Osnes; Tor Skomedal; Ulrik Wisløff; Øyvind Ellingsen Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Barbara Sternfeld; Hua Wang; Charles P Quesenberry; Barbara Abrams; Susan A Everson-Rose; Gail A Greendale; Karen A Matthews; Javier I Torrens; MaryFran Sowers Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Frank W Booth; Christian K Roberts; John P Thyfault; Gregory N Ruegsegger; Ryan G Toedebusch Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: James L Dorling; Christoph Höchsmann; S Nicole Fearnbach; John W Apolzan; Daniel S Hsia; Neil M Johannsen; Tim S Church; Corby K Martin Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2021-08-01
Authors: Anna Puig-Ribera; Judit Bort-Roig; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Maria Giné-Garriga; Josep Fortuño; Joan C Martori; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Raimon Milà; Jim McKenna; Nicholas D Gilson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joshua E McGee; Savanna G Barefoot; Nicole R Gniewek; Patricia M Brophy; Angela Clark; Gabriel S Dubis; Terence E Ryan; Joseph A Houmard; Paul Vos; Thomas D Raedeke; Damon L Swift Journal: Trials Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 2.279