BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis has evolved from an anatomic concept to a poorly defined clinical syndrome. Rules for such a syndrome need to be informed by the experience and beliefs of expert clinicians. The level of certainty is seldom considered in defining criteria for a syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To design an innovative online recursive survey technique to seek out information that is valued by specialists and to measure the impact of this evidence on their strength of conviction regarding the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective online survey. SETTING: University-based project. PARTICIPANTS: American physiatrists recruited by online postings and postcards. INTERVENTIONS: A recursive process presented a scenario that allowed clinicians to choose 1 of 10 clinical factors and then asked their level of certainty about diagnosis when that factor is true. Subsequent questions build on that assumption by adding other factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Certainty regarding the diagnosis of clinical lumbar spinal stenosis. RESULTS: Of a total of 97 participants, 80 completed 3 or more iterations. "Leg pain while walking" (66%), "must sit down or bend" (66%), and "flex forward while walking" (49%) were the most commonly selected questions. "Normal foot pulses" (19%), "back pain" (16%), "leg pain" (15%), "relief with rest" (14%), and "sensory deficits" (12%) were of intermediate value, whereas "problems with balance," "have fallen recently," and "the sacroiliac joint is not the main pain generator" were all chosen less than 5% of the time. Statistically significant (P < .05) change in certainty ceased after 6 questions at 86.2% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: A recursive approach to diagnostic certainty is valuable. Within 5 questions, clinicians become almost 90% certain that a person has clinical spinal stenosis. This question set provides one pragmatic clinical criterion for the syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis.
BACKGROUND:Lumbar spinal stenosis has evolved from an anatomic concept to a poorly defined clinical syndrome. Rules for such a syndrome need to be informed by the experience and beliefs of expert clinicians. The level of certainty is seldom considered in defining criteria for a syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To design an innovative online recursive survey technique to seek out information that is valued by specialists and to measure the impact of this evidence on their strength of conviction regarding the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective online survey. SETTING: University-based project. PARTICIPANTS: American physiatrists recruited by online postings and postcards. INTERVENTIONS: A recursive process presented a scenario that allowed clinicians to choose 1 of 10 clinical factors and then asked their level of certainty about diagnosis when that factor is true. Subsequent questions build on that assumption by adding other factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Certainty regarding the diagnosis of clinical lumbar spinal stenosis. RESULTS: Of a total of 97 participants, 80 completed 3 or more iterations. "Leg pain while walking" (66%), "must sit down or bend" (66%), and "flex forward while walking" (49%) were the most commonly selected questions. "Normal foot pulses" (19%), "back pain" (16%), "leg pain" (15%), "relief with rest" (14%), and "sensory deficits" (12%) were of intermediate value, whereas "problems with balance," "have fallen recently," and "the sacroiliac joint is not the main pain generator" were all chosen less than 5% of the time. Statistically significant (P < .05) change in certainty ceased after 6 questions at 86.2% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: A recursive approach to diagnostic certainty is valuable. Within 5 questions, clinicians become almost 90% certain that a person has clinical spinal stenosis. This question set provides one pragmatic clinical criterion for the syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Authors: Christy Tomkins-Lane; Markus Melloh; Jon Lurie; Matt Smuck; Michele C Battié; Brian Freeman; Dino Samartzis; Richard Hu; Thomas Barz; Kent Stuber; Michael Schneider; Andrew Haig; Constantin Schizas; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Anne F Mannion; Lukas Staub; Christine Comer; Luciana Macedo; Sang-Ho Ahn; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Danielle Sandella Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.241