OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of communication skills training (CST) on working alliance and to identify specific communicational elements related to working alliance. METHODS: Pre- and post-training simulated patient interviews (6-month interval) of oncology physicians and nurses (N=56) who benefited from CST were compared to two simulated patient interviews with a 6-month interval of oncology physicians and nurses (N=57) who did not benefit from CST. The patient-clinician interaction was analyzed by means of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Alliance was measured by the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised Form. RESULTS: While working alliance did not improve with CST, generalized linear mixed effect models demonstrated that the quality of verbal communication was related to alliance. Positive talk and psychosocial counseling fostered alliance whereas negative talk, biomedical information and patient's questions diminished alliance. CONCLUSION: Patient-clinician alliance is related to specific verbal communication behaviors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Working alliance is a key element of patient-physician communication which deserves further investigation as a new marker and efficacy criterion of CST outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of communication skills training (CST) on working alliance and to identify specific communicational elements related to working alliance. METHODS: Pre- and post-training simulated patient interviews (6-month interval) of oncology physicians and nurses (N=56) who benefited from CST were compared to two simulated patient interviews with a 6-month interval of oncology physicians and nurses (N=57) who did not benefit from CST. The patient-clinician interaction was analyzed by means of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Alliance was measured by the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised Form. RESULTS: While working alliance did not improve with CST, generalized linear mixed effect models demonstrated that the quality of verbal communication was related to alliance. Positive talk and psychosocial counseling fostered alliance whereas negative talk, biomedical information and patient's questions diminished alliance. CONCLUSION:Patient-clinician alliance is related to specific verbal communication behaviors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Working alliance is a key element of patient-physician communication which deserves further investigation as a new marker and efficacy criterion of CST outcome.
Authors: Marci Lee Nilsen; Mary Beth Happ; Heidi Donovan; Amber Barnato; Leslie Hoffman; Susan M Sereika Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Alessandro S De Nadai; Marc S Karver; Tanya K Murphy; Mark A Cavitt; Jeffrey L Alvaro; Michael Bengtson; Saundra Stock; Andrew C Rakhshani; Eric A Storch Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Caroline H Abbott; Michael J Fisch; Robert J Friedlander; Paul R Duberstein; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: F Fischer; S Helmer; A Rogge; J I Arraras; A Buchholz; A Hannawa; M Horneber; A Kiss; M Rose; W Söllner; B Stein; J Weis; P Schofield; C M Witt Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Rebecca Murray; Amanda Baker; Sean Halpin; Ben Britton; Kristen McCarter; Kerrin Palazzi; Alison K Beck Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2019-07-17