Literature DB >> 23158533

Molecular hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of cardiac angiotensin II type 1 receptors.

Kenji Fukushima1, Paco E Bravo, Takahiro Higuchi, Karl H Schuleri, Xiaoping Lin, M Roselle Abraham, Jinsong Xia, William B Mathews, Robert F Dannals, Albert C Lardo, Zsolt Szabo, Frank M Bengel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility of targeted imaging of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) in cardiac tissue, using clinical hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).
BACKGROUND: AT1R is an attractive imaging target due to its key role in various cardiac pathologies, including post-infarct left ventricular remodeling.
METHODS: Using the novel AT1R ligand [(11)C]-KR31173, dynamic PET/CT was performed in young farm pigs under healthy conditions (n = 4) and 3 to 4 weeks after experimental myocardial infarction (n = 5). Ex vivo validation was carried out by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. First-in-man application was performed in 4 healthy volunteers at baseline and under AT1R blocking.
RESULTS: In healthy pigs, myocardial KR31173 retention was detectable, regionally homogeneous, and specific for AT1R, as confirmed by blocking experiments. Metabolism in plasma was low (85 ± 2% of intact tracer after 60 min). After myocardial infarction, KR31173 retention, corrected for regional perfusion, revealed AT1R up-regulation in the infarct area relative to remote myocardium, whereas retention was elevated in both regions when compared with myocardium of healthy controls (8.7 ± 0.8% and 7.1 ± 0.3%/min vs. 5.8 ± 0.4%/min for infarct and remote, respectively, vs. healthy controls; p < 0.01 each). Postmortem analysis confirmed AT1R up-regulation in remote and infarct tissue. First-in-man application was safe, and showed detectable and specific myocardial KR31173 retention, albeit at a lower level than pigs (left ventricular average retention: 1.2 ± 0.1%/min vs. 4.4 ± 1.2%/min for humans vs. pigs; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive imaging of cardiac AT1R expression is feasible using clinical PET/CT technology. Results provide a rationale for broader clinical testing of AT1R-targeted molecular imaging.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158533      PMCID: PMC3522758          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  26 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy.

Authors:  M G Sutton; N Sharpe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A novel radioligand for imaging the AT1 angiotensin receptor with PET.

Authors:  William B Mathews; Sung-Eun Yoo; Sung-Hou Lee; Ursula Scheffel; Paige A Rauseo; Tamas G Zober; Gerard Gocco; Kathryn Sandberg; Hayden T Ravert; Robert F Dannals; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Radionuclide imaging of angiotensin II type 1 receptor upregulation after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Takahiro Higuchi; Kenji Fukushima; Jinsong Xia; William B Mathews; Riikka Lautamäki; Paco E Bravo; Mehrbod S Javadi; Robert F Dannals; Zsolt Szabo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Multimodality imaging of myocardial injury and remodeling.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Albert J Sinusas; David E Sosnovik; Brent A French; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Evidence for the efficacy of ARBs across the cardiovascular continuum.

Authors:  Milan Gupta; George N Honos; Eric J Velazquez; Namsik Chung; Willie Oigman; Aldo P Maggioni
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Molecular imaging of human ACE-1 expression in transgenic rats.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Todd K Zynda; Artiom Petrov; Satoru Ohshima; Nobuhiro Tahara; Nezam Haider; Amanda Donohue; Omer Aras; Frank J Femia; Shawn M Hillier; John L Joyal; Nathan D Wong; Tomika Coleman; John W Babich; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04

7.  Noninvasive imaging of angiotensin receptors after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Johan W H Verjans; Dagfinn Lovhaug; Navneet Narula; Artiom D Petrov; Bård Indrevoll; Emma Bjurgert; Tatiana B Krasieva; Lizette B Petersen; Grete M Kindberg; Magne Solbakken; Alan Cuthbertson; Mani A Vannan; Chris P M Reutelingsperger; Bruce J Tromberg; Leonard Hofstra; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

Review 8.  Intracardiac renin-angiotensin system and myocardial repair/remodeling following infarction.

Authors:  Yao Sun
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  Integration of infarct size, tissue perfusion, and metabolism by hybrid cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography: evaluation in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Karl H Schuleri; Tetsuo Sasano; Mehrbod S Javadi; Amr Youssef; Jennifer Merrill; Stephan G Nekolla; M Roselle Abraham; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  The angiotensin II receptor type 2 agonist CGP 42112A stimulates NO production in the porcine jejunal mucosa.

Authors:  Sara Ewert; Mats Laesser; Bernalt Johansson; Mathias Holm; Anders Aneman; Lars Fandriks
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03-04
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided therapies for myocardial repair: concepts and practical implementation.

Authors:  Frank M Bengel; Richard T George; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Creation of clinically relevant model of chronic heart failure: Application of multi-modality imaging to define physiology.

Authors:  Stephanie Thorn; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Playing slot to hitting the jackpot in molecular imaging: On probability of uncovering subcellular pathogenesis vs achieving clinical applicability.

Authors:  Hans J de Haas; Jagat Narula
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Highlights of the year in JACC 2012.

Authors:  Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Cardiac molecular imaging to track left ventricular remodeling in heart failure.

Authors:  Jamshid Shirani; Amitoj Singh; Sahil Agrawal; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  The advancing clinical impact of molecular imaging in CVD.

Authors:  Eric A Osborn; Farouc A Jaffer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12

7.  Novel Imaging Techniques for Heart Failure.

Authors:  Josep L Melero-Ferrer; Raquel López-Vilella; Herminio Morillas-Climent; Jorge Sanz-Sánchez; Ignacio J Sánchez-Lázaro; Luis Almenar-Bonet; Luis Martínez-Dolz
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2016-05

Review 8.  PET imaging in heart failure: the role of new tracers.

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Molecular imaging in cardiovascular disease: Which methods, which diseases?

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner; Albert Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Cardiac PET-CT for monitoring medical and interventional therapy in patients with CAD: PET alone versus hybrid PET-CT?

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.