OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility of targeted imaging of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) in cardiac tissue, using clinical hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). BACKGROUND: AT1R is an attractive imaging target due to its key role in various cardiac pathologies, including post-infarct left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: Using the novel AT1R ligand [(11)C]-KR31173, dynamic PET/CT was performed in young farm pigs under healthy conditions (n = 4) and 3 to 4 weeks after experimental myocardial infarction (n = 5). Ex vivo validation was carried out by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. First-in-man application was performed in 4 healthy volunteers at baseline and under AT1R blocking. RESULTS: In healthy pigs, myocardial KR31173 retention was detectable, regionally homogeneous, and specific for AT1R, as confirmed by blocking experiments. Metabolism in plasma was low (85 ± 2% of intact tracer after 60 min). After myocardial infarction, KR31173 retention, corrected for regional perfusion, revealed AT1R up-regulation in the infarct area relative to remote myocardium, whereas retention was elevated in both regions when compared with myocardium of healthy controls (8.7 ± 0.8% and 7.1 ± 0.3%/min vs. 5.8 ± 0.4%/min for infarct and remote, respectively, vs. healthy controls; p < 0.01 each). Postmortem analysis confirmed AT1R up-regulation in remote and infarct tissue. First-in-man application was safe, and showed detectable and specific myocardial KR31173 retention, albeit at a lower level than pigs (left ventricular average retention: 1.2 ± 0.1%/min vs. 4.4 ± 1.2%/min for humans vs. pigs; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive imaging of cardiac AT1R expression is feasible using clinical PET/CT technology. Results provide a rationale for broader clinical testing of AT1R-targeted molecular imaging.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility of targeted imaging of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) in cardiac tissue, using clinical hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). BACKGROUND:AT1R is an attractive imaging target due to its key role in various cardiac pathologies, including post-infarct left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: Using the novel AT1R ligand [(11)C]-KR31173, dynamic PET/CT was performed in young farm pigs under healthy conditions (n = 4) and 3 to 4 weeks after experimental myocardial infarction (n = 5). Ex vivo validation was carried out by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction. First-in-man application was performed in 4 healthy volunteers at baseline and under AT1R blocking. RESULTS: In healthy pigs, myocardial KR31173 retention was detectable, regionally homogeneous, and specific for AT1R, as confirmed by blocking experiments. Metabolism in plasma was low (85 ± 2% of intact tracer after 60 min). After myocardial infarction, KR31173 retention, corrected for regional perfusion, revealed AT1R up-regulation in the infarct area relative to remote myocardium, whereas retention was elevated in both regions when compared with myocardium of healthy controls (8.7 ± 0.8% and 7.1 ± 0.3%/min vs. 5.8 ± 0.4%/min for infarct and remote, respectively, vs. healthy controls; p < 0.01 each). Postmortem analysis confirmed AT1R up-regulation in remote and infarct tissue. First-in-man application was safe, and showed detectable and specific myocardial KR31173 retention, albeit at a lower level than pigs (left ventricular average retention: 1.2 ± 0.1%/min vs. 4.4 ± 1.2%/min for humans vs. pigs; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive imaging of cardiac AT1R expression is feasible using clinical PET/CT technology. Results provide a rationale for broader clinical testing of AT1R-targeted molecular imaging.
Authors: William B Mathews; Sung-Eun Yoo; Sung-Hou Lee; Ursula Scheffel; Paige A Rauseo; Tamas G Zober; Gerard Gocco; Kathryn Sandberg; Hayden T Ravert; Robert F Dannals; Zsolt Szabo Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Takahiro Higuchi; Kenji Fukushima; Jinsong Xia; William B Mathews; Riikka Lautamäki; Paco E Bravo; Mehrbod S Javadi; Robert F Dannals; Zsolt Szabo; Frank M Bengel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher M Kramer; Albert J Sinusas; David E Sosnovik; Brent A French; Frank M Bengel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Milan Gupta; George N Honos; Eric J Velazquez; Namsik Chung; Willie Oigman; Aldo P Maggioni Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Johan W H Verjans; Dagfinn Lovhaug; Navneet Narula; Artiom D Petrov; Bård Indrevoll; Emma Bjurgert; Tatiana B Krasieva; Lizette B Petersen; Grete M Kindberg; Magne Solbakken; Alan Cuthbertson; Mani A Vannan; Chris P M Reutelingsperger; Bruce J Tromberg; Leonard Hofstra; Jagat Narula Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-05
Authors: Riikka Lautamäki; Karl H Schuleri; Tetsuo Sasano; Mehrbod S Javadi; Amr Youssef; Jennifer Merrill; Stephan G Nekolla; M Roselle Abraham; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Frank M Bengel; Richard T George; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Kai C Wollert Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 24.094