| Literature DB >> 23155500 |
Marelize van Wyk1, Jolanda Roux, Gilbert Kamgan Nkuekam, Brenda D Wingfield, Michael J Wingfield.
Abstract
Eucalyptus trees, mostly native to Australia, are widely planted in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere for the production of wood and pulp. Worldwide surveys of diseases on these trees have yielded a large collection of Ceratocystis isolates from dying trees or from wounds on their stems. The aim of this study was to characterise these isolates and to consider their relatedness to each other. Culture appearance, morphological features and a distinctive fruity odour in all cultures were typical of species in the Ceratocystis fimbriatasensu lato (s. lat.) complex. Phylogenetic analyses of sequences for the combined ITS, βt-1 and TEF1-α gene regions revealed a genetically diverse group of isolates residing in a single large clade, that were distinct from all other species in the C. fimbriatas. lat. complex. Based on morphology and phylogenetic inference, the Eucalyptus isolates are recognised as closely related. The South African isolates are described here as a new species, C. eucalypticola.Entities:
Keywords: Microascales; canker stain diseases; tree pathogens; wounds
Year: 2012 PMID: 23155500 PMCID: PMC3399102 DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2012.03.01.06
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IMA Fungus ISSN: 2210-6340 Impact factor: 3.515
Table 1. Isolates of Ceratocystis fimbriata s. lat. spp. used in this study.
| CMW4068 | DQ520638, EF070429, EF070400 | South Africa | ||
| CMW5329 | AF388947, DQ371649, EF070401 | Uganda | ||
| CMW19383, | EF070414, EF070430, EF070402 | Australia | ||
| CMW19385, | EF070415, EF070431, EF070403 | Australia | ||
| CMW15051, | DQ520636, EF070427, EF070398 | Costa Rica | ||
| CMW14809, | DQ520637, EF070428, EF070399 | Ecuador | ||
| CMW14793, | EF070424, EF070439, EF070412 | USA | ||
| CMW14808, | EF070423, EF070440, EF070411 | USA | ||
| CMW9565, | AY233864, AY233870, EU241487 | Soil | Colombia | |
| CMW5751, | AY177233, AY177225, EU241493 | Colombia | ||
| CMW9572 | AY233863, AY233871, EU241488 | Mandarin | Colombia | |
| CMW15049, | DQ520629, EF070442, EF070394 | USA | ||
| CMW1547 | AF264904, EF070443, EF070395 | Papua New Guinea | ||
| CMW24174, | EF190963, EF190951, EF190957 | Venezuela | ||
| CMW24176, | EF190964, EF190952, EF190958 | Venezuela | ||
| CMW25434, | EU881906, EU881894, EU881900 | Indonesia | ||
| CMW25435, | EU881907, EU881895, EU881901 | Indonesia | ||
| CMW13851, | AY953383, EF433308, EF433317 | Oman | ||
| CMW13852, | AY953384, EF433309, EF433318 | Oman | ||
| CMW17808, | EF127990, EU881898, EU881904 | Colombia | ||
| CMW18194, | EF127991, EU881899, EU881905 | Colombia | ||
| CMW23807, | EU245004, EU244976, EU244936 | South Africa | ||
| CMW23808, | EU245003, EU244975, EU244935 | South Africa | ||
| CMW8857 | AY233868, AY233878, EU241483 | Colombia | ||
| CMW8856, | AY233867, AY233874, EU241484 | Citrus lemon | Colombia | |
| CMW10844 | AY177238, AY177229, EU241481 | Colombia | ||
| CMW6569 | AF427104, DQ371652, AY528982 | Australia | ||
| CMW6579, | AF427105, DQ371653, AY528983 | Australia | ||
| CMW14802, | DQ520630, EF070425, EF070396 | USA | ||
| CMW23918 | EF070426, EF070397, EU426554 | Greece | ||
| CMW11424, | AY528970, AY528966, AY528978 | Indonesia | ||
| CMW11436, | AY528971, AY528967, AY528979 | Indonesia | ||
| CMW23809, | EU245006, EU244978, EU244938 | South Africa | ||
| CMW23818, | EU245007, EU244979, EU244939 | South Africa | ||
| CMW14789, | EF070418, EF070434, EF070406 | Poland | ||
| CMW14819, | EF070419, EF070435, EF070407 | USA | ||
| CMW14800, | EF070420, EF070436, EF070408 | USA | ||
| CMW26383, | EU426553, EU426555, EU426556 | USA | ||
| CMW15991, | EU244997, EU244969, EU244929 | Tanzania | ||
| CMW15999, | EU244998, EU244970, EU244939 | Tanzania | ||
| CMW14276, | EF408555, EF408569, EF408576 | South Africa | ||
| CMW14278, | EF408556, EF408570, EF408577 | South Africa | ||
| CMW20935, | EF070421, EF070437, EF070409 | USA | ||
| CMW20936, | EF070422, EF070438, EF070410 | USA | ||
| CMW11164 | DQ520639, EF070441, EF070413 | USA | ||
| CMW3276 | AY528984, AY528990, AY529011 | USA | ||
| CMW15235 | EU245002, EU244974, EU244934 | Malawi | ||
| CMW15236 | EU245000, EU244972, EU244932 | Malawi | ||
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences of the ITS, βt and TEF1-α gene regions for isolates from Eucalyptus including those provided the name C. eucalypticola and other described species in the C. fimbriata s. lat. complex. Ceratocystis virescens represents the out-group taxon. Bootstrap values are indicated at the branch nodes and Bayesian values in brackets.
Fig. 2.A phylogenetic tree for the combined sequences of the ITS, βt and EF1-α gene regions, including only the undescribed C. fimbriata s. lat. isolates with Eucalyptus as their host. The closely related species, C. colombiana, is included as outgroup. Bootstrap support is indicated at the branch nodes while Bayesian support is indicated in brackets.
Fig. 3.Three phylograms each representing a single gene region (ITS, βt and TEF-1α, top to bottom) for the undescribed isolates from Eucalyptus representing C. fimbriata s. lat. showing low variation in the three separate gene regions as well as no support for the sub-clades observed in the combined gene trees. No outgroup was assigned to this dataset.
Table 2. The number of differences observed between the sequences of the isolates from Eucalyptus (C. fimbriata s. lat.) from Brazil, South Africa, Uruguay, Uganda, Congo, Thailand, Indonesia, and C. colombiana.
| Brazil | – | 9 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| South Africa | 9 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 21 | |
| Uruguay | 0 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 21 | |
| Uganda | 6 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 28 | |
| Congo | 13 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 25 | |
| Thailand | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 20 | |
| Indonesia | 0 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 22 | |
| 23 | 21 | 21 | 28 | 25 | 20 | 22 | ||
| Brazil | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| South Africa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Uruguay | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Uganda | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Congo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Thailand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Indonesia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Brazil | – | 13 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 21 |
| South Africa | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Uruguay | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Uganda | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Congo | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Thailand | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| Indonesia | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
Fig. 4.Allele networks obtained from the three combined gene regions (ITS, βt and TEF1-α for all isolates from Eucalyptus as well as C. colombiana. The species C. colombiana is represented as highly different to the Eucalyptus isolates due to the fact that it formed a separate allele tree. The C. fimbriata s.lat. isolates from Eucalyptus all formed one allele tree with high variation observed within the tree.
Table 3. Morphological comparison of two representative isolates from Indonesia, South Africa, Thailand, and Uruguay. Ten measurements were taken of each structure and the (minimum-) average minus standard deviation – average plus standard deviation and (-maximum) given below.
| Globose | Globose | Globose | Globose | |
| (125−)162–199(−200) | (120−)142–190(−202) | (188−)190–197(−200) | (144−)170–197(−200) | |
| (143−)173–193(−200) | (132−)143–193(−216) | (154−)177–199(−212) | (141−)164–184(−197) | |
| (390−)400–450(−470) | (372−)392–460(−486) | (354−)370–400(−424) | (354−)368–386(−409) | |
| (24−)25–35(−40) | (24−)25–35(−42) | (24−)25–35(−39) | (23−)26–32(−38) | |
| (15−)16–18(−20) | (15−)16–20(−22) | (16−)17–19(−20) | (15−)16–22(−25) | |
| Divergent | Divergent | Divergent | Divergent | |
| (36−)43–53(−63) | (39−)40–52(−62) | (33−)35–39(−41) | (38−)41–51(−53) | |
| 3–5 | 3–5 | 3–4 | 3–4 | |
| 4–6 | 4–6 | 4–6 | 4–6 | |
| 5–8 | 5–7(−8) | 5–7 | 6–7 | |
| (69−)70–100(−134) | (73−)76–114(−131) | (67−)76–96(−100) | (73−)75–83(−88) | |
| 4–6 | 4–6 | 4–6 | 2–4 | |
| 4–6 | 4–6 | 6–8 | 4–5 | |
| 3–5 | 3–5 | 3–5 | 3–4 | |
| (60−)70–100(−143) | (64−)69–109(−143) | (63−)68–77(−99) | (69−)72–96(−109) | |
| 3–6 | 3–6 | 5–6 | 3–6 | |
| 5–7 | 5–7 | 4–8 | 6–8 | |
| (13−)19–20(−24) | (15−)18–24(−25) | (10−)13–17(−18) | (10−)11–15(−18) | |
| 4–5 | 4–5 | 3–4 | 2–3 | |
| 6–8 | 6–8 | 6–8 | (7−)9–11 | |
| 5–8 | 5–7 | 5–8 | 6–8 | |
| Globose/Subglobose | Globose/Subglobose | Globose/Subglobose | Globose/Subglobose | |
| 10–15 | 10–13 | 12–15 | (6−)7–11(−13) | |
| 8–13 | 8–10 | 10–13 | (5−)7–11(−12) | |
Table 4. Morphological comparison of previously described species in the C. fimbriata s. lat. species complex obtained from Eucalyptus trees compared to C. eucalypticola.
| Globose | Globose | Globose | Globose | Globose | Obpyriform | |
| (120−)140–180 (−222) | (105−)140–186 (−222) | (142−)173–215 (−234) | (173−)202–244 (−281) | (140−)177–237 (−294) | 145–216(−279) | |
| (120−)150–178 (−200) | (118−)146–184 (−216) | (145−)178–225 (−255) | (153−)178–228 (−250) | (140−)177–237 (−294) | 115–186(−206) | |
| (270−)310–400 (−460) | (274−)376–464 (−499) | (446−)660–890 (−1070) | (691−)745–840 (−889) | (375−)448–560 (−676) | 372–683(−778) | |
| (21−)26–34(−40) | (19−)25–33(−42) | (28−)32–42(−47) | (27−)31–39(−46) | (24−)27–35(−43) | 18–33(−40) | |
| (13−)14–16(−19) | (14−)16–20(−22) | (16−)18–24(−28) | (14−)16–20(−22) | (12−)14–18(−19) | 12–21(−25) | |
| Divergent | Divergent | Divergent | Divergent | Divergent | Convergent | |
| (18−)20–26(−28) | (39−)45–59(−66) | (40−)49–61(−68) | (35−)41–49(−54) | (28−)38–46(−52) | N/A | |
| 3–4 | 3–5 | 2–4 | 3–6 | 3–4 | 4–6 | |
| 3–4 | 4–6 | 4–6 | 4–7 | (3−)4–6(−7) | 3–5 | |
| 4–6 | 5–7(−)8 | 5–7 | 5–8 | 6–8(−11) | 3–5 | |
| (78−)87–151(−218) | (58−)77–113(−131) | (49−)60–94(−122) | (75−)80–114(−152) | (58−)65–83(−106) | 62–147(−216) | |
| 5–7(−13) | (3−)4–6(−7) | 4–7 | (4−)5–7(−8) | 4–6(−8) | N/A | |
| 4–7 | 4–6(−7) | 5–9 | 5–9 | (3−)6–8(−9) | N/A | |
| 4–9 | 3–5 | 3–5 | (3−)4–6(−7) | 3–5(−6) | N/A | |
| (39−)43–57(−66) | (43−)60–100(−143) | Absent | (38−)48–76(−89) | (42−)49–71(−85) | N/A | |
| 5–7(−9) | (3−)4–6(−7) | Absent | (3−)5–7(−8) | (4−)5–7 | N/A | |
| 4–6)–7) | (4−)5–7(−8) | Absent | (3−)5–7(−8) | (5−)6–8 | N/A | |
| (9−)11–15(−17) | (14−)16–22(−25) | (14−)20–28(−31) | (11−)15–27(−30) | (12−)16–24(−29) | 12–25(−33) | |
| 3–5 | 3–5 | 3–5 | (3−)5–6 | 4–6 | 2–5 | |
| (7−)8–12(−14) | (6−)7–9(−12) | Absent | (6−)10–11 | 9–14 | 4–6 | |
| (5−)6–8(−9) | 4–6(−7) | Absent | (4−)5–7(−9) | 6–8(−11) | 3–5 | |
| Absent | Globose/Subglobose | Subglobose | Globose | Globose | Oval | |
| Absent | (10−)11–13(−15) | (6−)10–14(−15) | (8−)10–12(−13) | 11–14 | 8–12(−13) | |
| Absent | 8–10(−11) | (6−)7–11(−12) | (9−)10–14(−16) | 11–15(−17) | 5–8(−10) | |
| This study | ||||||
Fig. 5.Morphological characteristics of Ceratocystis eucalypticola. a. Ascomata with globose base. b. Hat-shaped (in side view) and cucullate (in top view) ascospores. c. Divergent ostiolar hyphae d. Dark, globose to sub-globose chlamydospore. e. Primary conidiophore, flask-shaped phialide, producing cylindrical conidia. f. Tubular shaped secondary conidiophore, producing a chain of barrel-shaped conidia. g. Chain of cylindrical conidia. h. Chain of barrel-shaped conidia. i. A chain of barrel-shaped conidia, two hat-shaped ascospores and a cylindrical conidium. Bars: a. = 100 μm, b, f–i = 5 μm, c–e = 10 μm.