Literature DB >> 23154641

Quantitative carbon ion beam radiography and tomography with a flat-panel detector.

Julia Telsemeyer1, Oliver Jäkel, Mária Martišíková.   

Abstract

High dose gradients are inherent to ion beam therapy. This results in high sensitivity to discrepancies between planned and delivered dose distributions. Therefore an accurate knowledge of the ion stopping power of the traversed tissue is critical. One proposed method to ensure high quality dose deposition is to measure the stopping power by ion radiography. Although the idea of imaging with highly energetic ions is more than forty years old, there is a lack of simple detectors suitable for this purpose. In this study the performance of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector, originally designed for photon imaging, was investigated for quantitative carbon ion radiography and tomography. The flat-panel detector was exploited to measure the water equivalent thickness (WET) and water equivalent path length (WEPL) of a phantom at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT). To do so, the ambiguous correlation of detector signal to particle energy was overcome by active or passive variation of carbon ion beam energy and measurement of the signal-to-beam energy correlation. The active method enables one to determine the WET of the imaged object with an uncertainty of 0.5 mm WET. For tomographic WEPL measurements the passive method was exploited resulting in an accuracy of 0.01 WEPL. The developed imaging technique presents a method to measure the two-dimensional maps of WET and WEPL of phantoms with a simple and commercially available detector. High spatial resolution of 0.8 × 0.8 mm(2) is given by the detector design. In the future this powerful tool will be used to evaluate the performance of the treatment planning algorithm by studying WET uncertainties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154641     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A novel proton-integrating radiography system design using a monolithic scintillator detector: experimental studies.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Daniel G Robertson; Fahed Alsanea; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.455

3.  A proton imaging system using a volumetric liquid scintillator: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chinmay D Darne; Fahed Alsanea; Daniel G Robertson; Fada Guan; Tinsu Pan; David Grosshans; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 4.  Advances in 4D treatment planning for scanned particle beam therapy - report of dedicated workshops.

Authors:  Christoph Bert; Christian Graeff; Marco Riboldi; Simeon Nill; Guido Baroni; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 5.  Proton radiography and tomography with application to proton therapy.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; N M Allinson; P M Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  High-energy proton imaging for biomedical applications.

Authors:  M Prall; M Durante; T Berger; B Przybyla; C Graeff; P M Lang; C LaTessa; L Shestov; P Simoniello; C Danly; F Mariam; F Merrill; P Nedrow; C Wilde; D Varentsov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Helium ion beam imaging for image guided ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Martišíková; T Gehrke; S Berke; G Aricò; O Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.