Ryo Asaoka1, Richard A Russell, Rizwan Malik, David P Crabb, David F Garway-Heath. 1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom. rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp
Abstract
PURPOSE: To create a new visual field (VF) test grid centered at the optic disc (disc-centered field [DCF]) and to infer the combination of VF test points (structure-function field [SFF]), taken from the DCF and the conventional fovea-centered 24-2 grid (24-2) of standard automated perimetry, which yields the strongest sectorial correlation between structure-function measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and VF sensitivity. METHODS: In 50 eyes with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma, the DCF and 24-2 VF were measured with a humphrey field analyzer II (Full Threshold strategy) and RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus optical coherence tomography. test points from the DCF and 24-2 VF Were combined and divided into 12 sectors according to the spatial distribution of the RNFL. A novel VF for structure-function studies was established using the following criteria: each sector must contain at least one or two test points (depending on the sector's location), and the combination of test points which yields the strongest structure-function correlation is selected. RESULTS: The SFF consisted of 40 test points. The structure-function correlation for the SFF was compared with the standard 24-2 VF; a multiple-comparison test for dependent groups was carried out using a percentile bootstrap method, which indicated that the sector correlation coefficients in the SFF were significantly higher than those in the 24-2 VF. CONCLUSIONS: The SFF, with fewer test locations, has a stronger structure-function correlation than the 24-2 VF. This improved correlation may help clinicians to better interpret functional measurements in relation to structural measurements.
PURPOSE: To create a new visual field (VF) test grid centered at the optic disc (disc-centered field [DCF]) and to infer the combination of VF test points (structure-function field [SFF]), taken from the DCF and the conventional fovea-centered 24-2 grid (24-2) of standard automated perimetry, which yields the strongest sectorial correlation between structure-function measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and VF sensitivity. METHODS: In 50 eyes with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma, the DCF and 24-2 VF were measured with a humphrey field analyzer II (Full Threshold strategy) and RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus optical coherence tomography. test points from the DCF and 24-2 VF Were combined and divided into 12 sectors according to the spatial distribution of the RNFL. A novel VF for structure-function studies was established using the following criteria: each sector must contain at least one or two test points (depending on the sector's location), and the combination of test points which yields the strongest structure-function correlation is selected. RESULTS: The SFF consisted of 40 test points. The structure-function correlation for the SFF was compared with the standard 24-2 VF; a multiple-comparison test for dependent groups was carried out using a percentile bootstrap method, which indicated that the sector correlation coefficients in the SFF were significantly higher than those in the 24-2 VF. CONCLUSIONS: The SFF, with fewer test locations, has a stronger structure-function correlation than the 24-2 VF. This improved correlation may help clinicians to better interpret functional measurements in relation to structural measurements.
Authors: William H Swanson; Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; Victor E Malinovsky Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Tomas S Aleman; Jiayan Huang; Sean T Garrity; Stuart B Carter; Wendy D Aleman; Gui-Shuang Ying; Madhura A Tamhankar Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Mitchell W Dul; Rizwan Malik; Julie K Torbit; Bradley M Sutton; Douglas G Horner Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Mark Christopher; Christopher Bowd; Akram Belghith; Michael H Goldbaum; Robert N Weinreb; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Haogang Zhu; Richard A Russell; Luke J Saunders; Stefano Ceccon; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Esteban Morales; John Mark S de Leon; Niloufar Abdollahi; Fei Yu; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Rahul A Jonas; Ya Xing Wang; Hua Yang; Jian Jun Li; Liang Xu; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Jost B Jonas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.799