Literature DB >> 23154456

A novel distribution of visual field test points to improve the correlation between structure-function measurements.

Ryo Asaoka1, Richard A Russell, Rizwan Malik, David P Crabb, David F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To create a new visual field (VF) test grid centered at the optic disc (disc-centered field [DCF]) and to infer the combination of VF test points (structure-function field [SFF]), taken from the DCF and the conventional fovea-centered 24-2 grid (24-2) of standard automated perimetry, which yields the strongest sectorial correlation between structure-function measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and VF sensitivity.
METHODS: In 50 eyes with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma, the DCF and 24-2 VF were measured with a humphrey field analyzer II (Full Threshold strategy) and RNFL thickness was measured with Stratus optical coherence tomography. test points from the DCF and 24-2 VF Were combined and divided into 12 sectors according to the spatial distribution of the RNFL. A novel VF for structure-function studies was established using the following criteria: each sector must contain at least one or two test points (depending on the sector's location), and the combination of test points which yields the strongest structure-function correlation is selected.
RESULTS: The SFF consisted of 40 test points. The structure-function correlation for the SFF was compared with the standard 24-2 VF; a multiple-comparison test for dependent groups was carried out using a percentile bootstrap method, which indicated that the sector correlation coefficients in the SFF were significantly higher than those in the 24-2 VF.
CONCLUSIONS: The SFF, with fewer test locations, has a stronger structure-function correlation than the 24-2 VF. This improved correlation may help clinicians to better interpret functional measurements in relation to structural measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154456     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Characteristic correlations of the structure-function relationship in different glaucomatous disc types.

Authors:  Kazuko Omodaka; Naoko Takada; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Makoto Araie; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Relationship Between Optic Nerve Appearance and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Explored with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Tomas S Aleman; Jiayan Huang; Sean T Garrity; Stuart B Carter; Wendy D Aleman; Gui-Shuang Ying; Madhura A Tamhankar
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Mitchell W Dul; Rizwan Malik; Julie K Torbit; Bradley M Sutton; Douglas G Horner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.

Authors:  Mark Christopher; Christopher Bowd; Akram Belghith; Michael H Goldbaum; Robert N Weinreb; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Detecting changes in retinal function: Analysis with Non-Stationary Weibull Error Regression and Spatial enhancement (ANSWERS).

Authors:  Haogang Zhu; Richard A Russell; Luke J Saunders; Stefano Ceccon; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR).

Authors:  Esteban Morales; John Mark S de Leon; Niloufar Abdollahi; Fei Yu; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Optic Disc - Fovea Angle: The Beijing Eye Study 2011.

Authors:  Rahul A Jonas; Ya Xing Wang; Hua Yang; Jian Jun Li; Liang Xu; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pattern Recognition Analysis Reveals Unique Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours Using Static Perimetry Thresholds Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.