Literature DB >> 23153590

Analysis of disease recurrence and survival for women with uterine malignancies undergoing robotic surgery.

Lorna A Brudie1, Floor J Backes, Sarfraz Ahmad, Xiang Zhu, Neil J Finkler, Glenn E Bigsby, David E Cohn, David O'Malley, Jeffrey M Fowler, Robert W Holloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) for uterine malignancies.
METHODS: Medical records from 372 patients with uterine malignancies who underwent RALH from 3/06 to 3/09 at two institutions were reviewed for clinico-pathologic data, adjuvant therapies, disease recurrence, and survival. Median follow-up for survival analysis was 31 ± 14 months. Thirty (8.1%) patients were lost to follow-up before 12 months and censored from the recurrence analysis.
RESULTS: Mean age and BMI of 372 patients was 61.8 ± 9.8 years and 32.2 ± 8.4 kg/m(2) (range 19-70). Robotic procedures included RALH 16 (4.3%), RALH with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) 96 (25.8%), and RALH with pelvic-and-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) 252 (67.7%) cases. Histology included 319 (85.8%) endometrioid and 53 (12.6%) high-risk histologies. Mean pelvic and aortic lymph node counts were 16.8 ± 8.7 and 8.4 ± 4.5, respectively. Lymph node metastases were identified in 26 (7.3%) cases. Adjuvant therapies were prescribed for 108 (29.1%) of patients: 7.8% brachytherapy, 1.9% pelvic radiation+brachytherapy, 7.8% chemotherapy, 11.6% chemotherapy+radiation. Risk of recurrence for all patients was 8.3% and 17 (4.6%) patients died of disease. The estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for the entire study group was 89.3% and the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 89.1%, compared to 92.5% and 93.4% for the endometrioid sub-set.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic hysterectomy with staging lymphadenectomies during our 3-years of robotic experience had low-risk for recurrence and excellent disease-specific survival at a median follow-up time of 31 months.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23153590     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Liselotte Mettler; Nicolai Maass; Johannes Ackermann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.

Authors:  David W Doo; C Tyler Kirkland; Lauren H Griswold; Gerald McGwin; Warner K Huh; Charles A Leath; Kenneth H Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.

Authors:  Slavcho T Tomov; Grigor A Gorchev; Desislava K Kiprova; Aleksandar D Lyubenov; Nadezhda H Hinkova; Vesela D Tomova; Zornitsa V Gorcheva; Sarfraz Ahmad
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 4.  The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Teuta Shemshedini; Tana S Pradhan; Tarah L Pua; Sean S Tedjarati
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-01

5.  Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Kristina M Mori; Nikki L Neubauer
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-12

6.  Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Lan Ying Li; Lan Ying Wen; Sun Hee Park; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Sang Wun Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer staging: large retrospective single-institution study.

Authors:  Emanuele Perrone; Ilaria Capasso; Tina Pasciuto; Alessandro Gioè; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Stefano Restaino; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Predictors of limph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Florin Laurentiu Ignat; Alexandru Irimie; Nicolae Costin; Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu; Ioan Cosmin Lisencu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2013-11-06

9.  Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: modified radical hysterectomy in intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer using peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery.

Authors:  Rainer Kimmig; Bahriye Aktas; Paul Buderath; Pauline Wimberger; Antonella Iannaccone; Martin Heubner
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chirag A Shah; Tiffany Beck; John B Liao; Nadia V Giannakopoulos; Dan Veljovich; Pam Paley
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.