S M O'Neill1, J Liu, M F O'Rourke, S K Khoo. 1. Betty Byrne Henderson Women's Health Research Centre, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane and the University of Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk that increases with age, hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia, both for men and women (although more pronounced in women). This study was designed to establish whether menopause augments the age-dependent change. METHODS: The study evaluated pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity using applanation tonometry in 468 women (aged 40-80 years) sampled from the general population. In multiple linear regression models, age was the predominant correlate of increasing aortic augmentation pressure (p < 0.0001), augmentation index (p < 0.0001), augmentation index adjusted to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (p < 0.0001) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed no significant difference in adjusted mean of augmentation pressure, augmentation index or pulse wave velocity between menopause groups (pre-, peri-, postmenopause). Adjusted means of augmentation pressure and pulse wave velocity were comparable between women on hormone therapy (n = 130) and non-users (n = 338). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study challenge the assertion by some researchers that menopause accelerates age-dependent changes in arterial stiffness.
OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk that increases with age, hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia, both for men and women (although more pronounced in women). This study was designed to establish whether menopause augments the age-dependent change. METHODS: The study evaluated pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity using applanation tonometry in 468 women (aged 40-80 years) sampled from the general population. In multiple linear regression models, age was the predominant correlate of increasing aortic augmentation pressure (p < 0.0001), augmentation index (p < 0.0001), augmentation index adjusted to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (p < 0.0001) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed no significant difference in adjusted mean of augmentation pressure, augmentation index or pulse wave velocity between menopause groups (pre-, peri-, postmenopause). Adjusted means of augmentation pressure and pulse wave velocity were comparable between women on hormone therapy (n = 130) and non-users (n = 338). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study challenge the assertion by some researchers that menopause accelerates age-dependent changes in arterial stiffness.
Authors: Kara L Marlatt; Dori R Pitynski-Miller; Kathleen M Gavin; Kerrie L Moreau; Edward L Melanson; Nanette Santoro; Wendy M Kohrt Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Zubair A Khan; Imke Janssen; Joanne K Mazzarelli; Lynda H Powell; Andrius Dumasius; Susan A Everson-Rose; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Karen Matthews; Samar R El Khoudary; Perry J Weinstock; Steven M Hollenberg Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Saad Samargandy; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Jared W Magnani; Imke Janssen; Steven M Hollenberg; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Ronée E Harvey; Maja C Johnson; Sushant M Ranadive; Michael J Joyner; Brian D Lahr; Virginia M Miller; Jill N Barnes Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-12
Authors: Eija K Laakkonen; Jari E Karppinen; Satu Lehti; Earric Lee; Emilia Pesonen; Hanna-Kaarina Juppi; Urho M Kujala; Eero A Haapala; Pauliina Aukee; Jari A Laukkanen; Johanna K Ihalainen Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 5.555