Oxana Mian1, Raymond Pong. 1. Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Laurentian University, Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6. ox_mian@laurentian.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether better access to FP services decreases the likelihood of emergency department (ED) use among the Ontario population. DESIGN: Population-based telephone survey. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8502 Ontario residents aged 16 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency department use in the 12 months before the survey. RESULTS: Among the general population, having a regular FP was associated with having better access to FPs for immediate care (P < .001) but was not associated with a decreased likelihood of ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, P = .03). Better actual access to FP services for immediate care was associated with a decreased likelihood of ED use (OR = 0.62, P < .001) among the general population. Among those with chronic diseases, having a regular FP was associated with a decreased likelihood of ED use (OR = 0.47, P = .01). Of the Ontario population, 39.3% wanted to see FPs for immediate care at least once a year; 63.1% of them had seen FPs without difficulties and were significantly less likely to use EDs than those who did not see FPs or had difficulties accessing physicians when needed (OR = 0.62, P < .001). Having a chronic health condition, recent immigrant status, residence in rural and northern parts of Ontario, and lower educational and income levels were significant predictors of a higher likelihood of ED use, independent of access to FPs (P < .05). CONCLUSION: A decreased likelihood of ED use is strongly associated with having a regular FP among those with chronic diseases and with having access to FPs for immediate care among the general population. Further research is needed to understand what accounts for a higher likelihood of ED use among those with regular FPs, new immigrants, residents of northern and rural areas of Ontario, and people with low socioeconomic status when actual access and sociodemographic characteristics have been taken into consideration. More important, this study demonstrates a need of distinguishing between potential and actual access to care, as having a regular FP and having timely and effective access to FP care might mean different things and have different effects on ED use.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether better access to FP services decreases the likelihood of emergency department (ED) use among the Ontario population. DESIGN: Population-based telephone survey. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8502 Ontario residents aged 16 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency department use in the 12 months before the survey. RESULTS: Among the general population, having a regular FP was associated with having better access to FPs for immediate care (P < .001) but was not associated with a decreased likelihood of ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, P = .03). Better actual access to FP services for immediate care was associated with a decreased likelihood of ED use (OR = 0.62, P < .001) among the general population. Among those with chronic diseases, having a regular FP was associated with a decreased likelihood of ED use (OR = 0.47, P = .01). Of the Ontario population, 39.3% wanted to see FPs for immediate care at least once a year; 63.1% of them had seen FPs without difficulties and were significantly less likely to use EDs than those who did not see FPs or had difficulties accessing physicians when needed (OR = 0.62, P < .001). Having a chronic health condition, recent immigrant status, residence in rural and northern parts of Ontario, and lower educational and income levels were significant predictors of a higher likelihood of ED use, independent of access to FPs (P < .05). CONCLUSION: A decreased likelihood of ED use is strongly associated with having a regular FP among those with chronic diseases and with having access to FPs for immediate care among the general population. Further research is needed to understand what accounts for a higher likelihood of ED use among those with regular FPs, new immigrants, residents of northern and rural areas of Ontario, and people with low socioeconomic status when actual access and sociodemographic characteristics have been taken into consideration. More important, this study demonstrates a need of distinguishing between potential and actual access to care, as having a regular FP and having timely and effective access to FP care might mean different things and have different effects on ED use.
Authors: R A Rosenblatt; G E Wright; L M Baldwin; L Chan; P Clitherow; F M Chen; L G Hart Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ellen J Weber; Jonathan A Showstack; Kelly A Hunt; David C Colby; Michael L Callaham Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jonathan Afilalo; Adrian Marinovich; Marc Afilalo; Antoinette Colacone; Ruth Léger; Bernard Unger; Claudine Giguère Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Lisa L Cook; Richard P Golonka; Charles M Cook; Robin L Walker; Peter Faris; Shannon Spenceley; Richard Lewanczuk; Robert Wedel; Rebecca Love; Cheryl Andres; Susan D Byers; Tim Collins; Scott Oddie Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-11-16
Authors: Ken J Farion; Megan Wright; Roger Zemek; Gina Neto; Anna Karwowska; Sandra Tse; Sarah Reid; Mona Jabbour; Stephanie Poirier; Katherine A Moreau; Nicholas Barrowman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John C Hogenbirk; Margaret G French; Patrick E Timony; Roger P Strasser; Dan Hunt; Raymond W Pong Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 2.692