Literature DB >> 23151932

Decisional involvement in Magnet®, magnet-aspiring, and non-magnet hospitals.

Susan Houston1, Marygrace Leveille, Rosemary Luquire, Angela Fike, Gerald O Ogola, Shingisai Chando.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empowered decision making can help establish innovative work cultures. OJECTIVE: This study used the Decisional Involvement Scale to determine differences in actual and preferred decisional involvement among staff RNs and administrators in Magnet®, Magnet-aspiring, and non-Magnet hospitals.
METHODS: : Two facilities were Magnet designated, 3 were Magnet aspiring, and 9 were non-Magnet. A total of 5000 staff RNs and administrators were asked to participate in the nonexperimental descriptive survey. RESUTS: The difference observed in actual global scale score by Magnet status was statistically significant (P = .01). Respondents in Magnet hospitals had the highest actual global scale score on average, followed by Magnet-aspiring, then non-Magnet.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisional involvement is higher among Magnet-designated than non-Magnet facilities.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23151932     DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e318274b5d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Adm        ISSN: 0002-0443            Impact factor:   1.737


  9 in total

1.  The Effects of Nursing Satisfaction and Turnover Cognitions on Patient Attitudes and Outcomes: A Three-Level Multisource Study.

Authors:  Sara Jansen Perry; Jason P Richter; Brad Beauvais
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Access disparities to Magnet hospitals for ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Correlation of hospital magnet status with the quality of physicians performing neurosurgical procedures in New York State.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Association of Hospitalization for Neurosurgical Operations in Magnet Hospitals With Mortality and Length of Stay.

Authors:  Symeon Missios; Kimon Bekelis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Rong Xia; Amir Ghaferi; John D Birkmeyer; Mousumi Banerjee
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Access disparities to Magnet hospitals for patients undergoing neurosurgical operations.

Authors:  Symeon Missios; Kimon Bekelis
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Nurse work engagement impacts job outcome and nurse-assessed quality of care: model testing with nurse practice environment and nurse work characteristics as predictors.

Authors:  Peter Van Bogaert; Danny van Heusden; Olaf Timmermans; Erik Franck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-13

8.  Association of Magnet Status With Hospitalization Outcomes for Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Peter Van Bogaert; Lieve Peremans; Danny Van Heusden; Martijn Verspuy; Veronika Kureckova; Zoë Van de Cruys; Erik Franck
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2017-01-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.