Literature DB >> 23151494

Quantitative falls risk estimation through multi-sensor assessment of standing balance.

Barry R Greene1, Denise McGrath, Lorcan Walsh, Emer P Doheny, David McKeown, Chiara Garattini, Clodagh Cunningham, Lisa Crosby, Brian Caulfield, Rose A Kenny.   

Abstract

Falls are the most common cause of injury and hospitalization and one of the principal causes of death and disability in older adults worldwide. Measures of postural stability have been associated with the incidence of falls in older adults. The aim of this study was to develop a model that accurately classifies fallers and non-fallers using novel multi-sensor quantitative balance metrics that can be easily deployed into a home or clinic setting. We compared the classification accuracy of our model with an established method for falls risk assessment, the Berg balance scale. Data were acquired using two sensor modalities--a pressure sensitive platform sensor and a body-worn inertial sensor, mounted on the lower back--from 120 community dwelling older adults (65 with a history of falls, 55 without, mean age 73.7 ± 5.8 years, 63 female) while performing a number of standing balance tasks in a geriatric research clinic. Results obtained using a support vector machine yielded a mean classification accuracy of 71.52% (95% CI: 68.82-74.28) in classifying falls history, obtained using one model classifying all data points. Considering male and female participant data separately yielded classification accuracies of 72.80% (95% CI: 68.85-77.17) and 73.33% (95% CI: 69.88-76.81) respectively, leading to a mean classification accuracy of 73.07% in identifying participants with a history of falls. Results compare favourably to those obtained using the Berg balance scale (mean classification accuracy: 59.42% (95% CI: 56.96-61.88)). Results from the present study could lead to a robust method for assessing falls risk in both supervised and unsupervised environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23151494     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/12/2049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  16 in total

Review 1.  Objective falls-risk prediction using wearable technologies amongst patients with and without neurogenic gait alterations: a narrative review of clinical feasibility.

Authors:  Callum M W Betteridge; Pragadesh Natarajan; R Dineth Fonseka; Daniel Ho; Ralph Mobbs; Wen Jie Choy
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-10-20

2.  Static Balance Digital Endpoints with Mon4t: Smartphone Sensors vs. Force Plate.

Authors:  Keren Tchelet Karlinsky; Yael Netz; Jeremy M Jacobs; Moshe Ayalon; Ziv Yekutieli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Ability of Wearable Accelerometers-Based Measures to Assess the Stability of Working Postures.

Authors:  Liangjie Guo; Junhui Kou; Mingyu Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  A study on balance assessment according to the levels of difficulty in postural control.

Authors:  Dong-Won Kang; Jeong-Woo Seo; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Seung-Tae Yang; Jin-Seung Choi; Gye-Rae Tack
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Plantar Pressure Variability and Asymmetry in Elderly Performing 60-Minute Treadmill Brisk-Walking: Paving the Way towards Fatigue-Induced Instability Assessment Using Wearable In-Shoe Pressure Sensors.

Authors:  Guoxin Zhang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Ivy Kwan-Kei Wong; Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Tommy Tung-Ho Hong; Yinghu Peng; Yan Wang; Qitao Tan; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Review: Are we stumbling in our quest to find the best predictor? Over-optimism in sensor-based models for predicting falls in older adults.

Authors:  Tal Shany; Kejia Wang; Ying Liu; Nigel H Lovell; Stephen J Redmond
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2015-08-03

7.  Association between vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression, balance, gait, and fall risk in ageing and neurodegenerative disease: protocol of a one-year prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Karin Srulijes; David J Mack; Jochen Klenk; Lars Schwickert; Espen A F Ihlen; Michael Schwenk; Ulrich Lindemann; Miriam Meyer; K C Srijana; Markus A Hobert; Kathrin Brockmann; Isabel Wurster; Jörn K Pomper; Matthis Synofzik; Erich Schneider; Uwe Ilg; Daniela Berg; Walter Maetzler; Clemens Becker
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 8.  Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors.

Authors:  Jennifer Howcroft; Jonathan Kofman; Edward D Lemaire
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruopeng Sun; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  Fifteen Years of Wireless Sensors for Balance Assessment in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Alessandro Zampogna; Ilaria Mileti; Eduardo Palermo; Claudia Celletti; Marco Paoloni; Alessandro Manoni; Ivan Mazzetta; Gloria Dalla Costa; Carlos Pérez-López; Filippo Camerota; Letizia Leocani; Joan Cabestany; Fernanda Irrera; Antonio Suppa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.