| Literature DB >> 23151186 |
Zehua Zhang1, Litao Li, Fei Luo, Peng Cheng, Feng Wu, Zheng Wu, Tianyong Hou, Min Zhong, Jianzhong Xu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays can detect tuberculosis and its multi-drug resistant form in M. tuberculosis isolates and sputum specimens with high sensitivity and specificity. However, no performance data currently exists for its use in spinal tuberculosis specimens. This study was aimed to assess the performance of the CapitalBio™ DNA microarray in the detection of isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RMP) resistance in spinal tuberculosis compared with the BACT/MGIT 960 system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23151186 PMCID: PMC3527135 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the DNA probe array for ,and detection. a. The biochip contains two microarrays and two specimens can be analyzed in parallel; for each array, one sub-array is for RMP, and the other is for INH. b. Six rpoB wild-type probes and thirteen mutation-type probes were designed for the detection of RMP resistance. c. For the detection of INH resistance, one probe covers the wild-type codon 315 of katG and two mutation-type probes for the same region, while one wild-type probe and one mutation-type probe detect the inhA promoter region. All probes were immobilized horizontally for five times. QC: quality controls, EC: external controls, BC: blank controls, NC: negative controls, IC: internal controls, WT: wild type.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the DNA probe array for different specimens. Seventeen oligonucleotide probes were chosen in several species-specific sequence regions of the 16S rRNA gene for identification of different Mycobacterium species. All probes were immobilized horizontally five times.
Overall sensitivity of the DNA microarray for thestrains identification
| Correct-no./total no. (%) | 87/93 (93.55) | 76/78 (97.44) | 11/15 (73.33) |
| 95% CI | 88.56-98.54 | 93.93-100.00 | 50.95-95.71 |
Figure 3Hybridization pattern of spinal tuberculosis specimens with the DNA microarray. a. Hybridization pattern of the M. tuberculosis strain identification (white frame) b. RMP resistance with the rpoB 531 (TCG->TTG) mutation, the hybridization signal of probe TCG531TTG (solid rectangle) being higher than corresponding wild-type probe (dashed rectangle) c. RMP resistance test: rpoB 516 (GAC->GTC) mutation, the hybridization signal of probe GAC516GTC (solid rectangle) being higher than corresponding wild-type probe (dashed rectangle) d, e. INH resistance test: katG 315 (AGC->ACC) mutation, the hybridisation signal of probe katG AGC315ACC (solid rectangles) were higher than corresponding wild-type probe (dashed rectangles) e. INH resistance test: inhA-15 C-T mutation, the hybridisation signal of probe inhA 15C→T (solid rectangles) were higher than corresponding wild-type probe (dashed rectangles).
Performance of the DNA microarray assay for detection of resistance to INH and RMP compared with phenotypic DST
| RMP resistance | 16/18 (88.89) | 74.37-100.00 | 68/75 (90.67) | 84.08-97.25 |
| INH resistance | 11/15 (73.33) | 50.95-95.71 | 71/78 (91.03) | 84.68-97.37 |