Literature DB >> 23148508

Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.

Richard A Britten1, Vahagn Nazaryan, Leslie K Davis, Susan B Klein, Dmitri Nichiporov, Marc S Mendonca, Mark Wolanski, Xiliang Nie, Jerry George, Cynthia Keppel.   

Abstract

Considerable evidence now exists to show that that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) changes considerably along the proton depth-dose distribution, with progressively higher RBE values at the distal part of the modulated, or spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) and in the distal dose fall-off (DDF). However, the highly variable nature of the existing studies (with regards to cell lines, and to the physical properties and dosimetry of the various proton beams) precludes any consensus regarding the RBE weighting factor at any position in the depth-dose profile. We have thus conducted a systematic study on the variation in RBE for cell killing for two clinical modulated proton beams at Indiana University and have determined the relationship between the RBE and the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) of the protons at various positions along the depth-dose profiles. Clonogenic assays were performed on human Hep2 laryngeal cancer cells and V79 cells at various positions along the SOBPs of beams with incident energies of 87 and 200 MeV. There was a marked variation in the radiosensitivity of both cell lines along the SOBP depth-dose profile of the 87 MeV proton beam. Using Hep2 cells, the D(0.1) isoeffect dose RBE values (normalized against (60)Co) were 1.46 at the middle of SOBP, 2.1 at the distal end of the SOBP and 2.3 in the DDF. For V79 cells, the D(0.1) isoeffect RBE for the 87 MEV beam were 1.23 for the proximal end of the SOBP: 1.46 for the distal SOBP and 1.78 for the DDF. Similar D(0.1) isoeffect RBE values were found for Hep2 cells irradiated at various positions along the depth-dose profile of the 200 MeV beam. Our experimentally derived RBE values were significantly correlated (P = 0.001) with the mean LETd of the protons at the various depths, which confirmed that proton RBE is highly dependent on LETd. These in vitro data suggest that the RBE of the proton beam at certain depths is greater than 1.1, a value currently used in most treatment planning algorithms. Thus, the potential for increased cell killing and normal tissue damage in the distal regions of the proton SOBP may be greater than originally thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148508     DOI: 10.1667/RR2737.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  37 in total

1.  Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  Fada Guan; Christopher Peeler; Lawrence Bronk; Changran Geng; Reza Taleei; Sharmalee Randeniya; Shuaiping Ge; Dragan Mirkovic; David Grosshans; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Comparing Photon and Charged Particle Therapy Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shayoni Ray; Egle Cekanaviciute; Ivan Paulino Lima; Brita Singers Sørensen; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 4.  Combined Treatment Modalities for High-Energy Proton Irradiation: Exploiting Specific DNA Repair Dependencies.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

5.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Exponential Increase in Relative Biological Effectiveness Along Distal Edge of a Proton Bragg Peak as Measured by Deoxyribonucleic Acid Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Chang Chang; Michael Lovelock; Daniel S Higginson; Dennis Mah; Oren Cahlon; Simon Powell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Particle therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhongxing Liao; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

8.  New strategies in radiation therapy: exploiting the full potential of protons.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Anita Mahajan; Bruce D Minsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Novel applications of proton therapy in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Shannon M MacDonald; Oren Cahlon
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08

10.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.