Literature DB >> 23147078

Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth.

Maged M Costantine1, Lisa Mele, Mark B Landon, Catherine Y Spong, Susan M Ramin, Brian Casey, Ronald J Wapner, Michael W Varner, Dwight J Rouse, John M Thorp, Anthony Sciscione, Patrick Catalano, Steve N Caritis, Yoram Sorokin, Alan M Peaceman, Jorge E Tolosa, Garland D Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of customized versus normalized population fetal growth norms in identifying neonates at risk for adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) associated with fetal overgrowth and gestational diabetes (GDM). STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter treatment trial of mild GDM. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal outcomes associated with fetal overgrowth and GDM. Birth weight percentiles were calculated using ethnicity- and gender-specific population and customized norms (Gardosi).
RESULTS: Two hundred three (9.8%) and 288 (13.8%) neonates were large for gestational age by population (LGApop) and customized (LGAcust) norms, respectively. Both LGApop and LGAcust were associated with the primary outcome and neonatal hyperinsulinemia, but neither was associated with hypoglycemia or hyperbilirubinemia. The ability of customized and population birth weight percentiles for predicting APOs were poor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve < 0.6 for six of eight APOs).
CONCLUSION: Neither customized nor normalized population norms better identify neonates at risk of APOs related to fetal overgrowth and GDM. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147078      PMCID: PMC3657303          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  31 in total

1.  Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards.

Authors:  B Clausson; J Gardosi; A Francis; S Cnattingius
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  The influence of paternal height and weight on birth-weight.

Authors:  J Morrison; G M Williams; J M Najman; M J Andersen
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?

Authors:  J A Hutcheon; X Zhang; S Cnattingius; M S Kramer; R W Platt
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Optimal growth modeling.

Authors:  Shane Reeves; Ira M Bernstein
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth: fetal growth potential.

Authors:  Radek Bukowski; Tatsuo Uchida; Gordon C S Smith; Fergal D Malone; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Gary D V Hankins; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population.

Authors:  C L de Jong; J Gardosi; G A Dekker; G J Colenbrander; H P van Geijn
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-05

7.  Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards.

Authors:  M Mongelli; J Gardosi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Anthropometric estimation of neonatal body composition.

Authors:  P M Catalano; A J Thomas; D A Avallone; S B Amini
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study.

Authors:  Anne Ego; Damien Subtil; Gilles Grange; Olivier Thiebaugeorges; Marie-Victoire Senat; Christophe Vayssiere; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; Marshall W Carpenter; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Margaret Harper; George Saade; Kristine Y Lain; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland B Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Dereje W Gudicha; Offer Erez; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Gaurav Bhatti; Percy Pacora; Eli Maymon; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Maternal prepregnancy BMI and size at birth: race/ethnicity-stratified, within-family associations in over 500,000 siblings.

Authors:  Janne Boone-Heinonen; Frances M Biel; Nicole E Marshall; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Parity-Adjusted Term Neonatal Growth Chart Modifies Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Roie Kofman; Rivka Farkash; Misgav Rottenstreich; Arnon Samueloff; Netanel Wasserteil; Yair Kasirer; Sorina Grisaru Granovsky
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Lindsey A Sjaarda; Paul S Albert; Sunni L Mumford; Stefanie N Hinkle; Pauline Mendola; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus.

Authors:  Marta Papaccio; Anna Fichera; Alessia Nava; Sonia Zatti; Vera Gerosa; Federico Ferrari; Enrico Sartori; Federico Prefumo; Nicola Fratelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.