Literature DB >> 18482613

Optimal growth modeling.

Shane Reeves1, Ira M Bernstein.   

Abstract

Abnormal fetal growth is associated with preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and necrotizing enterocolitis. An optimal fetal growth standard would be one that most correctly identifies the fetus at risk for poor perinatal outcome. A growth standard that is created using population-specific data is more applicable than generalized growth curves since there is evidence that optimal neonatal outcome is achieved at different birth weights in different populations. The development of fetal growth standards based exclusively on neonatal birth weights is flawed as fetal growth restriction is associated with preterm delivery. Likewise, employing clinically derived ultrasound standards for term gestations would include a population that is more likely to have abnormal growth. Novel approaches to defining normal intrauterine growth combine birth weights at term and fetal growth patterns in-utero to create growth curves useful in defining the normal intrauterine growth experience. This review examines the performance of a variety of the growth characterizing standards that have been employed to define abnormal growth and examines their performance in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482613     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  4 in total

1.  Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth.

Authors:  Maged M Costantine; Lisa Mele; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Brian Casey; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; John M Thorp; Anthony Sciscione; Patrick Catalano; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Jorge E Tolosa; Garland D Anderson
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Population versus customized fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes in an intrapartum cohort.

Authors:  Maged M Costantine; Yinglei Lai; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st gestational dating and fetal and newborn growth standards in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya: Provider experiences, uptake and clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Linda Vesel; Kojo Nimako; Rachel M Jones; Meghan Munson; Sarah Little; Henry Njogu; Irene Njuru; Teresa Ogolla; Grace Kimenju; Mary Nell Wegner; Sathyanath Rajasekharan; Nicholas Pearson; Ana Langer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differences in birthweight outcomes: a longitudinal study based on siblings.

Authors:  Silvia Bacci; Francesco Bartolucci; Manuela Chiavarini; Liliana Minelli; Luca Pieroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.