Literature DB >> 23146418

Ocular aberrations and visual function with multifocal versus single vision soft contact lenses.

Paul Gifford1, Tracey Cannon, Cheryl Lee, Deborah Lee, Hai Fang Lee, Helen A Swarbrick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate differences in ocular aberrations induced by centre-near multifocal soft contact lenses (SCL) relative to single vision SCLs and their effect on contrast sensitivity function (CSF).
METHODS: Ocular aberrometry was measured in 18 cyclopleged subjects (19-24 years) while wearing Ciba Air Optix low (AOlow) and high (AOhigh) add, Bausch & Lomb PureVision low (PVlow) and high (PVhigh) add multifocals, and a Bausch & Lomb PureVision single vision (PVsv) control with the same -3.00 D distance back vertex power. Zernike polynomials were scaled to 4, 5 and 6 mm pupils. CSF was measured at equivalent distances of 6 m, 1 m and 40 cm while fully corrected with spherical trial lenses at 6m.
RESULTS: AOlow, AOhigh and PVhigh induced a negative shift in primary spherical aberration (Z12) from PVsv and all multifocal SCLs induced a positive shift in secondary spherical aberration (Z24) (all p<0.01), without significantly increasing coma. Area under the CSF (AUCSF) reduced at 40 cm for all multifocals relative to PVsv (p<0.05), but was not significantly different at 6 m or 1 m. A moderate correlation (r = -0.80, p<0.005) was found between changes in Z12 and AUCSF at 40 cm for AOhigh, with an increase in negative Z12 reducing multifocal-induced loss of CSF.
CONCLUSIONS: Centre-near multifocal SCLs induced a negative shift in Z12 and a positive shift in Z24. Although CSF was unaffected at 6 m and 1m it was reduced at 40 cm, possibly because changes in Z12 and Z24 were not great enough to induce a significant shift in centre of focus and increase in depth of field.
Copyright © 2012 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146418     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Hikaru Ito; Yukari Ohori; Yui Takano; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Renfeng Xu; Larry Thibos; Gildas Marin; Martha Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Accommodation and Phoria in Children Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Celia R Gong; David Troilo; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.

Authors:  Daniel Tilia; Anna Munro; Jiyoon Chung; Jennifer Sha; Shona Delaney; Danny Kho; Varghese Thomas; Klaus Ehrmann; Ravi Chandra Bakaraju
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-05-07

5.  Ocular and corneal aberrations changes in controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS).

Authors:  Daniela Lopes-Ferreira; Alicia Ruiz-Pomeda; Belén Peréz-Sanchéz; António Queirós; César Villa-Collar
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Effect of low-addition soft contact lenses with decentered optical design on myopia progression in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikado; Sayuri Ninomiya; Takuma Kobayashi; Asaki Suzaki; Mitsuhiko Nakada; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.