Literature DB >> 23145846

Financial incentives and physician commitment to guideline-recommended hypertension management.

Sylvia J Hysong1, Kate Simpson, Kenneth Pietz, Richard SoRelle, Kristen Broussard Smitham, Laura A Petersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of financial incentives on physician goal commitment to guideline-recommended hypertension care. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinic-level cluster-randomized trial with 4 arms: individual, group, or combined incentives, and control.
METHODS: A total of 83 full-time primary care physicians at 12 Veterans Affairs medical centers completed web-based surveys measuring their goal commitment to guideline-recommended hypertension care every 4 months and telephone interviews at months 8 and 16. Intervention arm participants received performance-based incentives every 4 months for 5 periods. All participants received guideline education at baseline and audit and feedback every 4 months.
RESULTS: Physician goal commitment did not vary over time or across arms. Participants reported patient nonadherence was a perceived barrier and consistent follow-up was a perceived facilitator to successful hypertension care, suggesting that providers may perceive hypertension management as more of a patient responsibility (external locus of control).
CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives may constitute an insufficiently strong intervention to influence goal commitment when providers attribute performance to external forces beyond their control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145846      PMCID: PMC4169298     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  14 in total

1.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.

Authors:  J E Mathieu; T S Heffner; G F Goodwin; E Salas; J A Cannon-Bowers
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance.

Authors:  A Erez; T A Judge
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

5.  Passive monitoring versus active assessment of clinical performance: impact on measured quality of care.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Anthony Scott; Peter Sivey; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Lisa Willenberg; Lucio Naccarella; John Furler; Doris Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

7.  The effect of financial incentives on hospitals that serve poor patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Adol Esquivel; Dean F Sittig; Lindsey A Paul; Donna Espadas; Simran Singh; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson; Kenneth Pietz; Tracy H Urech; Sylvia J Hysong; Jochen Profit; Douglas A Conrad; R Adams Dudley; LeChauncy D Woodard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Pay-for-Performance and Veteran Care in the VHA and the Community: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karli K Kondo; Jessica Wyse; Aaron Mendelson; Gabriella Beard; Michele Freeman; Allison Low; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Calculations of Financial Incentives for Providers in a Pay-for-Performance Program: Manual Review Versus Data From Structured Fields in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Tracy H Urech; LeChauncy D Woodard; Salim S Virani; R Adams Dudley; Meghan Z Lutschg; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Developing and validating a comprehensive measure of coordination in patient aligned care teams.

Authors:  Amber B Amspoker; Houston F Lester; Christiane Spitzmueller; Candice L Thomas; Sylvia J Hysong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Anne Sales; Heather Colquhoun; Susan Michie; Robbie Foy; Jill J Francis; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Karen Tu; Jacqueline Young; Jill J Francis; Jan Barnsley; Baiju R Shah; Ross E Upshur; Rahim Moineddin; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.