Literature DB >> 23145500

Percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses: Washington University experience of treating 129 tumours.

Eric H Kim1, Youssef S Tanagho, Sam B Bhayani, Nael E Saad, Brian M Benway, R Sherburne Figenshau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: For patients who are unfit for extirpative surgery, percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) presents a minimally-invasive alternative for the treatment of renal masses. PCA has been demonstrated to be safe, with complication rates <10% being reported consistently. Studies have suggested that a minimal and insignificant decline in renal function can occur after PCA. Finally, among studies with a follow-up >20 months, treatment success rates range from 75% to 96%. However, longer-term oncological and functional results for patients treated with PCA are relatively limited. The present study profiles one of the largest reported experiences with PCA for renal masses: 129 tumours in 124 patients. Our complication rate was comparable to that observed in other reported studies. At a mean follow-up of 30 months, treatment success was achieved in 87% of tumours, which is in line with published PCA success rates. On multivariable analysis, tumour size >3.0 cm was found to be significantly associated with treatment failure. A minimal but statistically significant renal functional decline was observed, with 20% of patients experiencing a progression in National Kidney Foundation-Chronic Kidney Disease stage. On multivariable analysis, age >70 years, hilar tumour location and postoperative day 1 estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were found to be significantly associated with renal functional decline. The present study confirms that PCA of renal masses represents a safe alternative to surgery in patients with substantial medical comorbidities. In the present cohort, baseline patient and tumour characteristics probably impact the risk of tumour recurrence, as well as renal disease progression, after PCA.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal masses based on our single-centre experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 124 patients who underwent PCA for 129 renal tumours between March 2005 and June 2011. Patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics, tumour features, perioperative information, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Oncological outcomes were defined by radiographic evidence of recurrence on follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Renal disease progression was defined by a change in National Kidney Foundation-Chronic Kidney Disease stage.
RESULTS: Patients had mean (sd) age of 72.6 (10.2) years; mean (sd) tumour size and nephrometry score were 2.7 (1.1) cm and 6.5 (1.7), respectively. Our overall complication rate was 9% (11/124), whereas the major (greater than Clavien II) complication rate was 2% (2/124). Significant predictors of renal disease progression following PCA included age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.31, P = 0.03), hilar tumour location (OR, 4.67, P = 0.04), and post operative day 1 estimated glomerular filteration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (OR, 7.09, P = 0.02). Our treatment success rate was 87% (112/129) at a mean (sd) follow-up of 30.2 (18.8) months. Tumour size ≥3.0 cm was significantly associated with PCA failure (hazard ratio, 3.21, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: PCA provides a safe and oncologically effective alternative to extirpative surgery for renal masses in patients with significant medical comorbidities.
© 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145500     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11432.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  Update on cryoablation for treatment of small renal mass: oncologic control, renal function preservation, and rate of complications.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Yuding Wang; Brad Dishan; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation: current applications and results in the oncologic field.

Authors:  Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Julien Garnon; Nitin Ramamurthy; Guillaume Koch; Georgia Tsoumakidou; Jean Caudrelier; Francesco Arrigoni; Luigi Zugaro; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Afshin Gangi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Image-guided ablation of primary liver and renal tumours.

Authors:  David J Breen; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  The contemporary role of ablative treatment approaches in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): focus on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and cryoablation.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Nils Kroeger; Uwe Zimmermann; Martin Burchardt; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Serum and urine biomarkers for human renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A L Pastore; G Palleschi; L Silvestri; D Moschese; S Ricci; V Petrozza; A Carbone; A Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 6.  Follow-up after focal therapy in renal masses: an international multidisciplinary Delphi consensus project.

Authors:  P J Zondervan; P G K Wagstaff; M M Desai; D M de Bruin; A F Fraga; B A Hadaschik; J Köllermann; U B Liehr; S A Pahernik; H P Schlemmer; J J Wendler; F Algaba; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna Pes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Modeling Cryotherapy Ice Ball Dimensions and Isotherms in a Novel Gel-based Model to Determine Optimal Cryo-needle Configurations and Settings for Potential Use in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Taimur T Shah; Uri Arbel; Sonja Foss; Andrew Zachman; Simon Rodney; Hashim U Ahmed; Manit Arya
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Since 2012.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Choi; Jong Woo Kim; Jin Hyoung Kim; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Validation of a Web-Based Planning Tool for Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Tim J van Oostenbrugge; Jan Heidkamp; Michael Moche; Phil Weir; Panchatcharam Mariappan; Ronan Flanigan; Mika Pollari; Stephen Payne; Marina Kolesnik; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.