Literature DB >> 23145494

Solar UV exposure at eye is different from environmental UV: diurnal monitoring at different rotation angles using a manikin.

Liwen Hu1, Qian Gao, Na Gao, Guangcong Liu, Yang Wang, Huizhi Gong, Yang Liu.   

Abstract

Solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) promotes pterygium and cataract development in the human eye. When outdoors, people are subject to varying ocular UVR exposure intensity depending on time of day and orientation to the sun. To assess this variability, a manikin eye was exposed to solar UVR at 12 rotation angles relative to the sun with a solar elevation angle (SEA) ranging from 24.6° to 88.2°. At rotation angles of 0°, 30°, and 330°, the diurnal variation of ocular UVR exposure intensity showed a bimodal distribution that peaked at a SEA of about 40°, which was 3 to 4 hr both before and after noon. This timing differed from peak environmental UVR exposure intensity. At the other rotation angles, diurnal variations in ocular UV exposure exhibited unimodal curves, with maximum intensity around noon, the same as for environmental UVR. Thus, the idea that UVR exposure is most intense at midday is true for skin surfaces positioned somewhat horizontally but not for the eyes in a 60° arc with a centerline toward the sun (i.e., ranging 30° clockwise or counter-clockwise from the centerline). Maintaining certain orientations relative to the sun's position (for example, being clockwise or counter-clockwise by 30° from the sun) should effectively reduce ocular UVR exposure, especially at times when the SEA is 40°.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23145494     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.737700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  8 in total

1.  The angular distributions of ultraviolet spectral irradiance at different solar elevation angles under clear sky conditions.

Authors:  Yan Liu; LiWen Hu; Fang Wang; YanYan Gao; Yang Zheng; Yu Wang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Seasonal Effect on Ocular Sun Exposure and Conjunctival UV Autofluorescence.

Authors:  Kristina M Haworth; Heather L Chandler
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Efficiency of ocular UV protection by clear lenses.

Authors:  Katharina Rifai; Matthias Hornauer; Ramona Buechinger; Roland Schoen; Maria Barraza-Bernal; Selam Habtegiorgis; Carsten Glasenapp; Siegfried Wahl; Timo Mappes
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Cohort Study of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer and the Risk of Exfoliation Glaucoma.

Authors:  Jae H Kang; Trang VoPham; Francine Laden; Bernard A Rosner; Barbara Wirostko; Robert Ritch; Janey L Wiggs; Abrar Qureshi; Hongmei Nan; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Distributions of Direct, Reflected, and Diffuse Irradiance for Ocular UV Exposure at Different Solar Elevation Angles.

Authors:  Jiaming Yu; Hui Hua; Yan Liu; Yang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing Human Eye Exposure to UV Light: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Michele Marro; Laurent Moccozet; David Vernez
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Sun exposure to the eyes: predicted UV protection effectiveness of various sunglasses.

Authors:  C Backes; A Religi; L Moccozet; F Behar-Cohen; L Vuilleumier; J L Bulliard; D Vernez
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  UV Index Does Not Predict Ocular Ultraviolet Exposure.

Authors:  Natsuko Hatsusaka; Yusuke Seki; Norihiro Mita; Yuki Ukai; Hisanori Miyashita; Eri Kubo; David Sliney; Hiroshi Sasaki
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.