| Literature DB >> 23144970 |
Luca Passamonti1, Graeme Fairchild, Alex Fornito, Ian M Goodyer, Ian Nimmo-Smith, Cindy C Hagan, Andrew J Calder.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggested that structural and functional abnormalities within the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex contribute to the pathophysiology of Conduct Disorder (CD). Here, we investigated whether the integrity of the white-matter pathways connecting these regions is abnormal and thus may represent a putative neurobiological marker for CD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23144970 PMCID: PMC3492256 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the participants included in the diffusion tensor imaging analyses.
|
|
|
| |||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| |
|
| 18.4 | 0.8 | 18.6 | 0.9 | T = −0.7, P = 0.47 |
|
| 95.4 | 6.1 | 98.7 | 8.5 | T = −1.1, P = 0.27 |
|
| 2.6 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.2 | T = 4.5, P<0.001 |
|
| 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | T = 2.7, P = 0.011 |
|
| 10.0 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | T = 18, P<0.001 |
|
| 5.4 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | T = 7.7, P<0.001 |
|
| 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.3 | T = 8.6, P<0.001 |
|
| 29.6 | 6.5 | 29.5 | 3.9 | T = 0.5, P = 0.95 |
|
| 40.0 | 9.3 | 35.4 | 5.3 | T = 1.4, P = 0.14 |
|
| 6.3 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | T = 3.8, P<0.001 |
|
| 8.3 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | T = 5.8, P<0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wealthy achievers (1) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23.1 | P = 0.2 |
| Urban prosperity (2) | 1 | 7.7 | 3 | 23.1 | |
| Comfortably off (3) | 5 | 38.5 | 2 | 15.4 | |
| Moderate means (4) | 2 | 15.3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hard-pressed (5) | 5 | 38.5 | 5 | 38.4 | |
Key: SD, Standard Deviation; IQ, intelligence quotient; YPI, Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory; CD, Conduct Disorder; STAI, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; ADHD, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Figure 1Voxel based whole-brain Diffusion Tensor Imaging analysis.
The right external capsule was the only white matter area that emerged as significant when comparing FA maps from individuals with CD relative to age- and IQ-matched healthy controls (two-sample t test, P<0.05, corrected for the entire volume of the white-matter in the whole brain). The CD group showed increased FA values in this region relative to the healthy control group. MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute (x, y, z) coordinates. The color bar ranging from red (bottom) to yellow (top) represents T statistics.
Figure 2Examples of reconstructions of the right Uncinate Fascicle (left panel) or the left Inferior Frontal-Occipital Fascicle (right panel) pathways in two individual subjects.
Figure 3Plots of the fractional anisotropy (FA) values within the bilateral Uncinate Fascicle and the Inferior-Frontal-Occipital Fascicle in individuals with Conduct Disorder (CD) and healthy controls as obtained from tractography analyses.
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.
Mean fractional anisotropy (FA) values and number of streamlines reconstructed in the uncinate fascicle and inferior frontal occipital fascicle of individuals with CD and healthy controls.
| CONDUCT DISORDER (CD) | FA mean value | SD | Mean number of streamlines | SD |
| Right Uncinate Fascicle | 0.44 | 0.03 | 68.5 | 38.6 |
| Left Uncinate Fascicle | 0.45 | 0.04 | 77.6 | 37.5 |
| Right Inferior Frontal Occipital Fascicle | 0.52 | 0.03 | 86.4 | 48.0 |
| Left Inferior Frontal Occipital Fascicle | 0.52 | 0.03 | 105.3 | 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Right Uncinate Fascicle | 0.39 | 0.04 | 81.7 | 43.6 |
| Left Uncinate Fascicle | 0.41 | 0.02 | 48.0 | 35.4 |
| Right Inferior Frontal Occipital Fascicle | 0.52 | 0.04 | 138.9 | 87.0 |
| Left Inferior Frontal Occipital Fascicle | 0.54 | 0.03 | 139.9 | 115.1 |