Literature DB >> 23144598

Site-Specific Fragment Identification Guided by Single-Step Free Energy Perturbation Calculations.

E Prabhu Raman1, Kenno Vanommeslaeghe, Alexander D Mackerell.   

Abstract

The in-silico Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) approach identifies the binding sites of representative chemical entities on the entire protein surface, information that can be applied for computational fragment-based drug design. In this study, we report an efficient computational protocol that uses sampling of the protein-fragment conformational space obtained from the SILCS simulations and performs single step free energy perturbation (SSFEP) calculations to identify site-specific favorable chemical modifications of benzene involving substitutions of ring hydrogens with individual non-hydrogen atoms. The SSFEP method is able to capture the experimental trends in relative hydration free energies of benzene analogues and for two datasets of experimental relative binding free energies of congeneric series of ligands of the proteins α-thrombin and P38 MAP kinase. The approach includes a protocol in which data obtained from SILCS simulations of the proteins is first analyzed to identify favorable benzene binding sites following which an ensemble of benzene-protein conformations for that site is obtained. The SSFEP protocol applied to that ensemble results in good reproduction of experimental free energies of the α-thrombin ligands, but not for P38 MAP kinase ligands. Comparison with results from a P38 full-ligand simulation and analysis of conformations reveals the reason for the poor agreement being the connectivity with the remainder of the ligand, a limitation inherent in fragment-based methods. Since the SSFEP approach can identify favorable benzene modifications as well as identify the most favorable fragment conformations, the obtained information can be of value for fragment linking or structure-based optimization.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23144598      PMCID: PMC3490637          DOI: 10.1021/ct300088r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  32 in total

1.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Single-step perturbations to calculate free energy differences from unphysical reference states: limits on size, flexibility, and character.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  A MATHEMATICAL CONTRIBUTION TO STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY STUDIES.

Authors:  S M FREE; J W WILSON
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Fragment-based computation of binding free energies by systematic sampling.

Authors:  Matthew Clark; Siavash Meshkat; George T Talbot; Paolo Carnevali; Jeffrey S Wiseman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Design and synthesis of a series of potent and orally bioavailable noncovalent thrombin inhibitors that utilize nonbasic groups in the P1 position.

Authors:  T J Tucker; S F Brady; W C Lumma; S D Lewis; S J Gardell; A M Naylor-Olsen; Y Yan; J T Sisko; K J Stauffer; B J Lucas; J J Lynch; J J Cook; M T Stranieri; M A Holahan; E A Lyle; E P Baskin; I W Chen; K B Dancheck; J A Krueger; C M Cooper; J P Vacca
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1998-08-13       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Paulius Mikulskis; LiHong Hu; Jacob Kongsted; Pär Söderhjelm; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity.

Authors:  A Morton; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; E Prabhu Raman; Lei Fang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Spatial analysis and quantification of the thermodynamic driving forces in protein-ligand binding: binding site variability.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

6.  Using the fast fourier transform in binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Estimation of relative free energies of binding using pre-computed ensembles based on the single-step free energy perturbation and the site-identification by Ligand competitive saturation approaches.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Rajiah Aldrin Denny; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.

Authors:  Peter M U Ung; Phani Ghanakota; Sarah E Graham; Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Inclusion of multiple fragment types in the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) approach.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Wenbo Yu; Sirish K Lakkaraju; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  The novel BH3 α-helix mimetic JY-1-106 induces apoptosis in a subset of cancer cells (lung cancer, colon cancer and mesothelioma) by disrupting Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 protein-protein interactions with Bak.

Authors:  Xiaobo Cao; Jeremy L Yap; M Karen Newell-Rogers; Chander Peddaboina; Weihua Jiang; Harry T Papaconstantinou; Dan Jupitor; Arun Rai; Kwan-Young Jung; Richard P Tubin; Wenbo Yu; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Paul T Wilder; Alexander D MacKerell; Steven Fletcher; Roy W Smythe
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.