Literature DB >> 23143818

How and when to decide on revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease.

Alicia Mecklai1, Sripal Bangalore, Judith Hochman.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. While an invasive strategy of early revascularization reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes, there is no convincing evidence that this strategy leads to an incremental survival advantage for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) beyond that achieved by optimal medical therapy. Two landmark trials, COURAGE and BARI 2D, suggest that a strategy of aggressive medical therapy is a reasonable initial approach to such patients. However, there remain certain groups of patients, those with at least moderate ischemia on baseline stress testing, where there is still clinical equipoise. Major society guidelines favor revascularization based on observational data and trials of CABG conducted decades ago, yet data from modern randomized trials are lacking. Ongoing trials such as ISCHEMIA should provide clinicians with evidence to guide selection of the appropriate initial management strategy for patients with SIHD.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23143818     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-012-0214-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  63 in total

1.  The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Multicenter Study Group.

Authors:  L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; T H Marwick; M S Lauer; G V Heller; A E Iskandrian; K L Kesler; M I Travin; H C Lewin; R C Hendel; S Borges-Neto; D D Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Coronary-artery stents.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Michael J B Kutryk; Andrew T L Ong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is there an ischemic threshold beyond which percutaneous coronary intervention is beneficial in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Antianginal efficacy of ranolazine when added to treatment with amlodipine: the ERICA (Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina) trial.

Authors:  Peter H Stone; Nikolay A Gratsiansky; Alexey Blokhin; I-Zu Huang; Lixin Meng
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Recent changes in practice of elective percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina.

Authors:  Bina Ahmed; Harold L Dauerman; Winthrop D Piper; John F Robb; M Peter Verlee; Thomas J Ryan; David Goldberg; Richard A Boss; William J Phillips; Frank Fedele; David Butzel; David J Malenka
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-19

Review 7.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cardiologists' use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Grace A Lin; R Adams Dudley; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007 Aug 13-27

9.  Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Sunil Kumar; Mario Fusaro; Nicholas Amoroso; Michael J Attubato; Frederick Feit; Deepak L Bhatt; James Slater
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sequential proteome alterations during genesis and progression of colon cancer.

Authors:  U J Roblick; D Hirschberg; J K Habermann; C Palmberg; S Becker; S Krüger; M Gustafsson; H-P Bruch; B Franzén; T Ried; T Bergmann; G Auer; H Jörnvall
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  [Differential therapy in coronary heart disease].

Authors:  H Wienbergen; R Hambrecht
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Variation in Management of Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool (VA CART) Program.

Authors:  Amneet Sandhu; Maggie A Stanislawski; Gary K Grunwald; Kathryn Guinn; Javier Valle; Daniel Matlock; P Michael Ho; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.