Literature DB >> 16875985

Antianginal efficacy of ranolazine when added to treatment with amlodipine: the ERICA (Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina) trial.

Peter H Stone1, Nikolay A Gratsiansky, Alexey Blokhin, I-Zu Huang, Lixin Meng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if ranolazine improves angina in stable coronary patients with persisting symptoms despite maximum recommended dose of amlodipine.
BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is a unique antianginal agent that has been effective in stable angina, but it has not been studied in the setting of maximum recommended doses of conventional antianginal agents.
METHODS: Stable patients with coronary disease and > or =3 anginal attacks per week despite maximum recommended dosage of amlodipine (10 mg/day) were randomized to 1,000 mg ranolazine or placebo twice a day for 6 weeks. Primary end point was the frequency of angina episodes per week during the double-blind treatment phase. Efficacy was also assessed by nitroglycerin consumption per week and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Adjustment for multiple testing of secondary end points used a hierarchic closed testing procedure. Efficacy was assessed in subgroups based on baseline angina frequency, concomitant long-acting nitrate use, gender, and age. Safety was assessed by adverse events and electrocardiogram evaluations.
RESULTS: A total of 565 patients were randomized: 281 patients to ranolazine and 284 patients to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At baseline, angina frequency averaged 5.63 +/- 0.18 episodes/week, and nitroglycerin consumption averaged 4.72 +/- 0.21 tablets/week. Compared with placebo, ranolazine significantly reduced frequency of angina episodes (2.88 +/- 0.19 on ranolazine vs. 3.31 +/- 0.22 on placebo; p = 0.028) and nitroglycerin consumption (2.03 +/- 0.20 on ranolazine vs. 2.68 +/- 0.22; p = 0.014), with treatment effect that appeared consistent across subgroups. The median angina weekly episode rate at baseline was 4.5 per week. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions of angina frequency, nitroglycerin use, and SAQ angina frequency for patients with a baseline frequency >4.5 per week but only of angina frequency for those with baseline frequency < or =4.5 per week. Patients with more frequent angina appeared to have a more pronounced treatment effect. No hemodynamic changes were observed. Ranolazine was well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine significantly reduced frequency of angina and nitroglycerin consumption compared with placebo and was well tolerated. (The ERICA [Efficacy of Ranolazine In Chronic Angina] Trial; http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00091429).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875985     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  74 in total

Review 1.  Advancements in pharmacotherapy for angina.

Authors:  Ankur Jain; Islam Y Elgendy; Mohammad Al-Ani; Nayan Agarwal; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 2.  Long term medical treatment of stable coronary disease.

Authors:  David M Shavelle
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Medical therapy in acute coronary syndromes: which medicines and at what doses?

Authors:  Dmitriy Kireyev; Edward C Yun; Brian J Page; William E Boden
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Cost-utility of ranolazine for the symptomatic treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris in Spain.

Authors:  Alvaro Hidalgo-Vega; Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi; Renata Villoro
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  Ranolazine: a review of its use as add-on therapy in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Antagonist molecules in the treatment of angina.

Authors:  Ashish K Gupta; David Winchester; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.889

7.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of ranolazine versus amlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy : The ROMAN (RanOlazine vs. aMlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with CAD treated with dual ANtiplatelet therapy) study.

Authors:  Francesco Pelliccia; Cesare Greco; Carlo Gaudio; Giuseppe Rosano; Cristiana Vitale; Giuseppe Marazzi; Fabiana Rollini; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Anti-anginal and anti-ischemic effects of late sodium current inhibition.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.727

9.  Ranolazine combined with enalapril or metoprolol prevents progressive LV dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with moderate heart failure.

Authors:  Sharad Rastogi; Victor G Sharov; Sudhish Mishra; Ramesh C Gupta; Brent Blackburn; Luiz Belardinelli; William C Stanley; Hani N Sabbah
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Effect of ranolazine on A1C and glucose levels in hyperglycemic patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Chisholm; Allison B Goldfine; Arvinder K Dhalla; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow; Ewa Karwatowska-Prokopczuk; Luiz Belardinelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.