Literature DB >> 23142990

Influence of scanning density on macular choroidal volume measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Jay Chhablani1, Giulio Barteselli, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Igor Kozak, Haiyan Wang, Sharif El-Emam, Aubrey L Doede, Lingyun Cheng, William R Freeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of scanning density on macular choroidal volume measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
METHODS: Thirty eyes of normal subjects underwent consecutive raster choroidal scanning protocols using SD-OCT in enhanced-depth imaging mode. Manual choroidal segmentation was performed using the built-in automated retinal segmentation software to obtain five analyses with different inter-scan distances, including inter-scan distances of 30 μm, 60 μm, 120 μm, 240 μm, and 480 μm. The built-in software of the device automatically generated the choroidal thickness and volume map in the similar manner as for the retinal volume map, using the standardized Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid. For each raster scan, mean absolute difference and relative difference of mean foveal choroidal thickness (FCT), foveal choroidal volume (FCV) and total macular choroidal volume (TCV) in comparison to "true value" (i.e., 30-μm inter-scan distance) were calculated.
RESULTS: The maximum relative differences were 10% and 16% for TCV and FCV respectively. For mean FCT, the maximum absolute difference was 31 μm, and maximum relative difference was 12.7%. No statistically significant differences were found in measurements of mean foveal choroidal thickness (p = 0.912) and volume (p = 0.944), as well as macular choroidal volume (p = 0.912), with varying inter-scan distance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that approximately 16 scans over the macula with a inter-scan distance of 480 μm is sufficient to provide a clinically relevant and reliable choroidal thickness/volume map. This information could be useful in the design of choroidal scanning protocols for future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142990      PMCID: PMC3593737          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2188-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Repeatability and reproducibility of manual choroidal volume measurements using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jay Chhablani; Giulio Barteselli; Haiyan Wang; Sharif El-Emam; Igor Kozak; Aubrey L Doede; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Lingyun Cheng; William R Freeman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Choroidal thickness in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Song Ee Chung; Se Woong Kang; Jung Hye Lee; Yun Taek Kim
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Spatial distribution of posterior pole choroidal thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yanling Ouyang; Florian M Heussen; Nils Mokwa; Alexander C Walsh; Mary K Durbin; Pearse A Keane; P James Sanchez; Humberto Ruiz-Garcia; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Takamitsu Fujiwara; Yutaka Imamura; Ron Margolis; Jason S Slakter; Richard F Spaide
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Macular choroidal thickness and volume in normal subjects measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Masaya Hirata; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Akiko Matsumoto; Masanori Hangai; Sotaro Ooto; Kenji Yamashiro; Masahiro Akiba; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Subfoveal choroidal thickness in typical age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  Hideki Koizumi; Tetsuya Yamagishi; Taizo Yamazaki; Ryo Kawasaki; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Subfoveal choroidal thickness in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome.

Authors:  Ranko Aoyagi; Takaaki Hayashi; Akiko Masai; Katsuya Mitooka; Tamaki Gekka; Kenichi Kozaki; Hiroshi Tsuneoka
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Choroidal evaluation using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.

Authors:  Angie H C Fong; Kenneth K W Li; David Wong
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Yutaka Imamura; Takamitsu Fujiwara; Ron Margolis; Richard F Spaide
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Quality assurance of optical coherence tomography for diagnostics of the fundus : Positional statement of the BVA, DOG and RG].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Influence of choroidal thickness on subfoveal choroidal thickness measurement repeatability using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  A R Cho; Y J Choi; Y T Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Stepwise segmentation error correction in optical coherence tomography angiography images of patients with diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani; Reza Mirshahi; Shahriar Ghasemizadeh; Mahsa Sardarinia
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.