OBJECTIVE: Most cases of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are diagnosed in an advanced stage. When the disease has spread intra-abdominally, complete surgical tumor debulking is the single most important prognostic factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery can cause fibrosis and adhesions in the peritoneal cavity and may interfere with the perioperative evaluation of tumor spread. In this prospective study, we evaluated whether perioperative visual assessment of tumor dissemination is similar in patients undergoing primary and interval surgery for EOC. METHODS: Systematic visual evaluation of tumor spread was performed at the start of primary surgery/diagnostic laparoscopy (n=39) or interval surgery (n=16). Peritoneal cavity was divided into 22 anatomical regions. The carefully documented results of the visual assessment were compared with the histopathological analysis of 220 biopsies from primary and 92 biopsies from interval surgery. RESULTS: In primary surgery, perioperative visual estimation of tumor spread showed 98% sensitivity, 76% specificity and 95% accuracy compared to histopathology. The corresponding figures after NACT were 86%, 76% and 84%, respectively. The difference in sensitivity and accuracy in primary and interval operations was statistically significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced EOC, microscopically carcinomatous areas have a benign visual appearance more often after NACT than at primary surgery. NACT may interfere with the perioperative visual evaluation of tumor spread and thus lead to incomplete resection of tumor in potentially resectable areas.
OBJECTIVE: Most cases of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are diagnosed in an advanced stage. When the disease has spread intra-abdominally, complete surgical tumor debulking is the single most important prognostic factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery can cause fibrosis and adhesions in the peritoneal cavity and may interfere with the perioperative evaluation of tumor spread. In this prospective study, we evaluated whether perioperative visual assessment of tumor dissemination is similar in patients undergoing primary and interval surgery for EOC. METHODS: Systematic visual evaluation of tumor spread was performed at the start of primary surgery/diagnostic laparoscopy (n=39) or interval surgery (n=16). Peritoneal cavity was divided into 22 anatomical regions. The carefully documented results of the visual assessment were compared with the histopathological analysis of 220 biopsies from primary and 92 biopsies from interval surgery. RESULTS: In primary surgery, perioperative visual estimation of tumor spread showed 98% sensitivity, 76% specificity and 95% accuracy compared to histopathology. The corresponding figures after NACT were 86%, 76% and 84%, respectively. The difference in sensitivity and accuracy in primary and interval operations was statistically significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced EOC, microscopically carcinomatous areas have a benign visual appearance more often after NACT than at primary surgery. NACT may interfere with the perioperative visual evaluation of tumor spread and thus lead to incomplete resection of tumor in potentially resectable areas.
Authors: Zibi Marchocki; Alicia Tone; Carl Virtanen; Richard de Borja; Blaise Clarke; Theodore Brown; Taymaa May Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 5.506
Authors: Marianne J Rutten; Gabe S Sonke; Anneke M Westermann; Willemien J van Driel; Johannes W Trum; Gemma G Kenter; Marrije R Buist Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int Date: 2015-05-27
Authors: Yasmin A Lyons; Henry D Reyes; Megan E McDonald; Andreea Newtson; Eric Devor; David P Bender; Michael J Goodheart; Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 3.437