Literature DB >> 23142075

The prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lei Yu1, Lei Deng, Jinke Li, Yi Zhang, Lina Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in ovarian cancer remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between VEGF overexpression and survival outcomes in ovarian cancer patients.
METHODS: Studies were identified from PubMed and EMBASE searches performed on January 2nd, 2011. After careful review, survival data were extracted from eligible studies. A meta-analysis was performed to generate combined hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in serum and tumor tissue studies.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 1111 patients were analyzed. Elevated serum VEGF was significantly associated with poor PFS [HR 2.46, 95% CI (1.84, 3.29)] and OS [HR 2.21, 95% CI (1.57, 3.13)]. No significant heterogeneity existed in serum studies. Similarly, tissue VEGF overexpression was associated with poor PFS [HR 1.63, 95% CI (1.09, 2.42)] and OS [HR 1.70, 95% CI (1.01, 2.87)]. However, significant heterogeneity was found in tissue studies, with I(2) of 44% for PFS and 64% for OS. Studies were stratified into subgroups by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. Subgroup analyses showed that high tissue VEGF was significantly associated with shorter PFS [HR 5.34, 95% CI (1.95, 14.59)] and OS [HR 6.13, 95% CI (2.47, 15.26)] in studies where predominantly early-stage patients were included, but not in studies with a majority of advanced-stage patients. Subgroup analysis was not performed in serum studies because all those studies enrolled more patients in advanced stages than early stages.
CONCLUSIONS: Overexpression of VEGF in primary tumor and serum associates with poor PFS and OS for patients with ovarian cancer. The association between high tissue VEGF level and poor prognosis exists in early stage patients, but not in advanced stage patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  31 in total

1.  VEGF +936C/T and +460C/T gene polymorphisms and oral cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Su-Feng Zhao; Ping Zhan; Xu-Dong Yang; Ming-Xing Lu; Guo-Wen Sun; Yu-Xin Wang; Yin-Kai Zhang; Yu-Mei Pu; En-Yi Tang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Prognostic value of cancer stem cell marker CD133 in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quan Zhou; Aihua Chen; Huamei Song; Jing Tao; Huaijie Yang; Manzhen Zuo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Evaluation of a hypoxia regulated gene panel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amanda F Baker; Scott W Malm; Ritu Pandey; Cindy Laughren; Haiyan Cui; Denise Roe; Setsuko K Chambers
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 4.  Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Matias-Guiu; Ben Davidson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Recommendations for biomarker testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: a National Consensus Statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  A Oaknin; R Guarch; P Barretina; D Hardisson; A González-Martín; X Matías-Guiu; A Pérez-Fidalgo; B Vieites; I Romero; J Palacios
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Id-1, Id-2, and Id-3 co-expression correlates with prognosis in stage I and II lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Leila Antonângelo; Taila Tuma; Alexandre Fabro; Milena Acencio; Ricardo Terra; Edwin Parra; Francisco Vargas; Teresa Takagaki; Vera Capelozzi
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Anti-tumor effect of emodin on gynecological cancer cells.

Authors:  Yaoxian Wang; Hui Yu; Jin Zhang; Xin Ge; Jing Gao; Yunyan Zhang; Ge Lou
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  AAV-mediated persistent bevacizumab therapy suppresses tumor growth of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yi Xie; Martin J Hicks; Stephen M Kaminsky; Malcolm A S Moore; Ronald G Crystal; Arash Rafii
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Immunosuppressive parameters in serum of ovarian cancer patients change during the disease course.

Authors:  An Coosemans; Judit Decoene; Thaïs Baert; Annouschka Laenen; Ahmad Kasran; Tina Verschuere; Sven Seys; Ignace Vergote
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Molecular Mechanism Linking BRCA1 Dysfunction to High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancers with Peritoneal Permeability and Ascites.

Authors:  A Desai; J Xu; K Aysola; O Akinbobuyi; M White; V E Reddy; J Okoli; C Clark; E E Partridge; Ed Childs; D J Beech; M V Rice; Esp Reddy; V N Rao
Journal:  J Gynecol Res       Date:  2015-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.