Literature DB >> 23141906

Initial clinical experience with the HeartWare left ventricular assist system: a single-center report.

Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila1, Stefan Rudolf Bertram Schneider, Dominik Schlarb, Bassam Redwan, Jürgen R Sindermann, Björn Ellger, Jörg Stypmann, Tony D T Tjan, Hans H Scheld, Andreas Hoffmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) system (HeartWare International Inc, Framingham, MA) is a new centrifugal continuous-flow ventricular assist device. The aim of the present study is to review our institutional experience with this novel device.
METHODS: We reviewed the files of 50 patients (39 men, 11 women) with a mean age of 50.6 ± 11.8 years (range, 19 to 70 years) who underwent HVAD implantation between July 2009 and November 2011. Two patients underwent HeartWare BIVAD implantation. The underlying heart diseases were end-stage ischemic heart disease (n = 12), acute myocardial infarction (n = 9), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 27) and acute myocarditis (n = 2). Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profiles were level 1 (n = 11), 2 (n = 5), 3 (n = 10), and 4 (n = 24).
RESULTS: After a cumulative support duration of 11,086 days, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a survival of 82.0%, 77.9%, 75.5%, at 1, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Causes of early death were right heart failure (n = 4), multiorgan failure (n = 2), septic shock (n = 2), and major neurologic complications (n = 4). One late death occurred due to a right heart failure. Comparison between patients operated on in cardiogenic shock (INTERMACS 1 and 2) and patients who underwent elective HVAD implantation (INTERMACS 3 and 4) revealed a survival of 61.5% and 44.1% for the INTERMACS 1 and 2 group and 90.3% and 87.1% for the INTERMACS 3 and 4 group at 1 and 12 months, respectively (odds ratio, 4.67; p = 0.003). One patient was weaned from the system after 2 years. Eleven patients (22%) were successfully bridged to transplantation. Mean time to transplantation was 209 days (range, 72 to 427 days). Posttransplant survival at the 1-year follow-up was 90.9% (11 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with HVAD shows satisfying results with an excellent posttransplantation survival. Moreover, the stratified survival based on the level of preoperative stability shows better outcomes in patients undergoing elective HVAD implantation.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23141906     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  How to cope with a temporarily aborted transplant program: solutions for a prolonged waiting period.

Authors:  Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Martine Antoine; Bachar El Oumeiri; Marie-Luce Chirade; Jean-Luc Vachiéry; Guido J Van Nooten
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

2.  Metabolic volume performs better than SUVmax in the detection of left ventricular assist device driveline infection.

Authors:  Nemanja Avramovic; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Matthias Weckesser; Danka Milankovic; Alexis Vrachimis; Jürgen R Sindermann; Christian Wenning
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Initial experience in Japan with HeartWare ventricular assist system.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Taichi Sakaguchi; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas McNamara; Harry Narroway; Michael Williams; John Brookes; James Farag; David Cistulli; Paul Bannon; Silvana Marasco; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

5.  Outcomes and predictors of early mortality after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  Anton Sabashnikov; Prashant N Mohite; Bartlomiej Zych; Diana García; Aron-Frederik Popov; Alexander Weymann; Nikhil P Patil; Rachel Hards; Massimo Capoccia; Thorsten Wahlers; Fabio De Robertis; Toufan Bahrami; Mohamed Amrani; Nicholas R Banner; André R Simon
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  A retrospective evaluation of fondaparinux for confirmed or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in left-ventricular-assist device patients.

Authors:  Scott T Benken; Nicholas Tillman; Suhuir Dajani; Aesha Shah; Toby Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  QRS complex fragmentation and survival following left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Isac C Thomas; David P Cork; Ankit K Bhatia; Hemal M Nayak; Martin C Burke; Joshua D Moss
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2014-11-12

8.  Heartmate 3 fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device for the treatment of advanced heart failure -1 year results from the Ce mark trial.

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Ivan Netuka; Jan D Schmitto; Daniel Zimpfer; Jens Garbade; Vivek Rao; Michiel Morshuis; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Silvana Marasco; Laura Damme; Yuriy Pya
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Association between the low percentage of forced vital capacity and increased mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Pervin Korkmaz Ekren; Pelin Öztürk; Serkan Ertugay; Ali Özdil; Sanem Nalbantgil; Çağatay Engin; Tahir Yağdı; Mustafa Özbaran
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 0.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.