Literature DB >> 23140303

Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68.

Ralph Bloch1, Geoffrey Norman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalizability theory (G theory) is a statistical method to analyze the results of psychometric tests, such as tests of performance like the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, written or computer-based knowledge tests, rating scales, or self-assessment and personality tests. It is a generalization of classical reliability theory, which examines the relative contribution of the primary variable of interest, the performance of subjects, compared to error variance. In G theory, various sources of error contributing to the inaccuracy of measurement are explored. G theory is a valuable tool in judging the methodological quality of an assessment method and improving its precision. AIM: Starting from basic statistical principles, we gradually develop and explain the method. We introduce tools to perform generalizability analysis, and illustrate the use of generalizability analysis with a series of common, practical examples in educational practice.
CONCLUSION: We realize that statistics and mathematics can be either boring or fearsome to many physicians and educators, yet we believe that some foundations are necessary for a better understanding of generalizability analysis. Consequently, we have tried, wherever possible, to keep the use of equations to a minimum and to use a conversational and slightly "off-serious" style.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23140303     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.703791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  44 in total

1.  Reliable test of clinicians' mastery in skin cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Niels Kvorning Ternov; T Vestergaard; L Rosenkrantz Hölmich; K Karmisholt; A L Wagenblast; H Klyver; M Hald; L Schøllhammer; L Konge; A H Chakera
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Improving reliability of a residency interview process.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Michelle L Serres; Todd E Gundrum
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Raaj K Ruparel; David A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Generalizability Theory Made Simple(r): An Introductory Primer to G-Studies.

Authors:  Sandra Monteiro; Gail M Sullivan; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

6.  A Plea for Psychometric Rigor.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Lisa M Hayes
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.

Authors:  Lisette Hvid Hovgaard; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Lars Konge; Torur Dalsgaard; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Procedure-specific assessment tool for flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: gathering validity evidence and setting pass-fail standards.

Authors:  Jacob Melchiors; K Petersen; T Todsen; A Bohr; Lars Konge; Christian von Buchwald
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  How to Optimize Measurement Protocols: An Example of Assessing Measurement Reliability Using Generalizability Theory.

Authors:  Anthony A Gatti; Paul W Stratford; Nicholas M Brisson; Monica R Maly
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  Assessment of Residents Readiness to Perform Lumbar Puncture: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Troels Wienecke; Helle Thagesen; Rikke Vita Borre Jacobsen; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.