Ralph Bloch1, Geoffrey Norman. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. blochr@mcmaster.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Generalizability theory (G theory) is a statistical method to analyze the results of psychometric tests, such as tests of performance like the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, written or computer-based knowledge tests, rating scales, or self-assessment and personality tests. It is a generalization of classical reliability theory, which examines the relative contribution of the primary variable of interest, the performance of subjects, compared to error variance. In G theory, various sources of error contributing to the inaccuracy of measurement are explored. G theory is a valuable tool in judging the methodological quality of an assessment method and improving its precision. AIM: Starting from basic statistical principles, we gradually develop and explain the method. We introduce tools to perform generalizability analysis, and illustrate the use of generalizability analysis with a series of common, practical examples in educational practice. CONCLUSION: We realize that statistics and mathematics can be either boring or fearsome to many physicians and educators, yet we believe that some foundations are necessary for a better understanding of generalizability analysis. Consequently, we have tried, wherever possible, to keep the use of equations to a minimum and to use a conversational and slightly "off-serious" style.
BACKGROUND: Generalizability theory (G theory) is a statistical method to analyze the results of psychometric tests, such as tests of performance like the Objective Structured Clinical Examination, written or computer-based knowledge tests, rating scales, or self-assessment and personality tests. It is a generalization of classical reliability theory, which examines the relative contribution of the primary variable of interest, the performance of subjects, compared to error variance. In G theory, various sources of error contributing to the inaccuracy of measurement are explored. G theory is a valuable tool in judging the methodological quality of an assessment method and improving its precision. AIM: Starting from basic statistical principles, we gradually develop and explain the method. We introduce tools to perform generalizability analysis, and illustrate the use of generalizability analysis with a series of common, practical examples in educational practice. CONCLUSION: We realize that statistics and mathematics can be either boring or fearsome to many physicians and educators, yet we believe that some foundations are necessary for a better understanding of generalizability analysis. Consequently, we have tried, wherever possible, to keep the use of equations to a minimum and to use a conversational and slightly "off-serious" style.
Authors: Niels Kvorning Ternov; T Vestergaard; L Rosenkrantz Hölmich; K Karmisholt; A L Wagenblast; H Klyver; M Hald; L Schøllhammer; L Konge; A H Chakera Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Jacob Melchiors; K Petersen; T Todsen; A Bohr; Lars Konge; Christian von Buchwald Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Troels Wienecke; Helle Thagesen; Rikke Vita Borre Jacobsen; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.128