BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Asymmetry of the hippocampus is regarded as an important clinical finding, but limited data on hippocampal asymmetry are available for the general population. Here we present hippocampal asymmetry data from the Dallas Heart Study determined by automated methods and its relationship to age, sex, and ethnicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo MR imaging was performed in 2082 DHS-2 participants. The MR images were analyzed by using 2 standard automated brain-segmentation programs, FSL-FIRST and FreeSurfer. Individuals with imaging errors, self-reported stroke, or major structural abnormalities were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the significance of the findings across age, sex, and ethnicity. RESULTS: At the 90th percentile, FSL-FIRST demonstrated hippocampal asymmetry of 9.8% (95% CI, 9.3%-10.5%). The 90th percentile of hippocampal asymmetry, measured by the difference in right and left hippocampi volume and the larger hippocampus, was 17.9% (95% CI, 17.0%-19.1%). Hippocampal asymmetry increases with age (P=.0216), men have greater asymmetry than women as shown by FSL-FIRST (P=.0036), but ethnicity is not significantly correlated with asymmetry. To confirm these findings, we used FreeSurfer. FreeSurfer showed asymmetry of 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.7%) normalized to total volume and 8.5% (95% CI, 8.3%-9.0%) normalized by difference/larger hippocampus. FreeSurfer also showed that hippocampal asymmetry increases with age (P=.0024) and that men had greater asymmetry than women (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant degree of hippocampal asymmetry in the population. The data provided will aid in the research, diagnosis, and treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy and other neurologic disease.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Asymmetry of the hippocampus is regarded as an important clinical finding, but limited data on hippocampal asymmetry are available for the general population. Here we present hippocampal asymmetry data from the Dallas Heart Study determined by automated methods and its relationship to age, sex, and ethnicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo MR imaging was performed in 2082 DHS-2 participants. The MR images were analyzed by using 2 standard automated brain-segmentation programs, FSL-FIRST and FreeSurfer. Individuals with imaging errors, self-reported stroke, or major structural abnormalities were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the significance of the findings across age, sex, and ethnicity. RESULTS: At the 90th percentile, FSL-FIRST demonstrated hippocampal asymmetry of 9.8% (95% CI, 9.3%-10.5%). The 90th percentile of hippocampal asymmetry, measured by the difference in right and left hippocampi volume and the larger hippocampus, was 17.9% (95% CI, 17.0%-19.1%). Hippocampal asymmetry increases with age (P=.0216), men have greater asymmetry than women as shown by FSL-FIRST (P=.0036), but ethnicity is not significantly correlated with asymmetry. To confirm these findings, we used FreeSurfer. FreeSurfer showed asymmetry of 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.7%) normalized to total volume and 8.5% (95% CI, 8.3%-9.0%) normalized by difference/larger hippocampus. FreeSurfer also showed that hippocampal asymmetry increases with age (P=.0024) and that men had greater asymmetry than women (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant degree of hippocampal asymmetry in the population. The data provided will aid in the research, diagnosis, and treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy and other neurologic disease.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Eric Maltbie; Kshamta Bhatt; Beatriz Paniagua; Rachel G Smith; Michael M Graves; Matthew W Mosconi; Sarah Peterson; Scott White; Joseph Blocher; Mohammed El-Sayed; Heather C Hazlett; Martin A Styner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anqi Qiu; Lei Wang; Laurent Younes; Michael P Harms; J Tilak Ratnanather; Michael I Miller; John G Csernansky Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Erik H Middlebrooks; Ronald G Quisling; Michael A King; Paul R Carney; Steven Roper; Luis M Colon-Perez; Thomas H Mareci Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2017-03-12 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Kamilla W. Miskowiak; Julie L. Forman; Maj Vinberg; Hartwig R. Siebner; Lars V. Kessing; Julian Macoveanu Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Keith Thulborn; Elaine Lui; Jonathan Guntin; Saad Jamil; Ziqi Sun; Theodore C Claiborne; Ian C Atkinson Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jeremy F Strain; Kyle B Womack; Nyaz Didehbani; Jeffrey S Spence; Heather Conover; John Hart; Michael A Kraut; C Munro Cullum Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Hicham M Ibrahim; Alexandra Kulikova; Huy Ly; A John Rush; E Sherwood Brown Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Rajiv N Srinivasa; Heidi C Rossetti; Mohit K Gupta; Roger N Rosenberg; Myron F Weiner; Ronald M Peshock; Roderick W McColl; Linda S Hynan; Richard T Lucarelli; Kevin S King Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Scott M Carlson; Julie Kim; David A Khan; Kevin King; Richard T Lucarelli; Roderick McColl; Ronald Peshock; E Sherwood Brown Journal: J Asthma Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Megan K Lowther; Jarrod P Tunnell; Jayme M Palka; Darlene R King; Damilola C Salako; Dimitri G Macris; Jay B Italiya; Justin L Grodin; Carol S North; E Sherwood Brown Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Markus Donix; Alison C Burggren; Maria Scharf; Kira Marschner; Nanthia A Suthana; Prabha Siddarth; Allison K Krupa; Michael Jones; Laurel Martin-Harris; Linda M Ercoli; Karen J Miller; Annett Werner; Rüdiger von Kummer; Cathrin Sauer; Gary W Small; Vjera A Holthoff; Susan Y Bookheimer Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: E Sherwood Brown; Carroll W Hughes; Roderick McColl; Ronald Peshock; Kevin S King; A John Rush Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 7.853