Literature DB >> 23138759

Does patient gender impact resident physicians' approach to the cardiac exam?

Rosette J Chakkalakal1, Stacy M Higgins, Lisa B Bernstein, Kristina L Lundberg, Victor Wu, Jacqueline Green, Qi Long, Joyce P Doyle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical examination remains an important part of the initial evaluation of patients presenting with chest pain but little is known about the effect of patient gender on physician performance of the cardiovascular exam.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if resident physicians are less likely to perform five key components of the cardiovascular exam on female versus male standardized patients (SPs) presenting with acute chest pain.
DESIGN: Videotape review of SP encounters during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) administered by the Emory University Internal Medicine Residency Program in 2006 and 2007. Encounters were reviewed to assess residents' performance of five cardiac exam skills: auscultation of the aortic, pulmonic, tricuspid, and mitral valve areas and palpation for the apical impulse. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-nine incoming residents. MAIN MEASURES: Residents' performance for each skill was classified as correct, incorrect, or unknown. KEY
RESULTS: One hundred ten of 149 (74 %) of encounters were available for review. Residents were less likely to correctly perform each of the five skills on female versus male SPs. This difference was statistically significant for auscultation of the tricuspid (p = 0.004, RR = 0.62, 95 % CI 0.46-0.83) and mitral (p = 0.007, RR = 0.58, 95 % CI = 0.41-0.83) valve regions and palpation for the apical impulse (p < 0.001, RR = 0.27, 95 % CI = 0.16-0.47). Male residents were less likely than female residents to correctly perform each maneuver on female versus male SPs. The interaction of SP gender and resident gender was statistically significant for auscultation of the mitral valve region (p = 0.006) and palpation for the apical impulse (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant differences in the performance of key elements of the cardiac exam for female versus male SPs presenting with chest pain. This observation represents a previously unidentified but potentially important source of gender bias in the evaluation of patients presenting with cardiovascular complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23138759      PMCID: PMC3599025          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2256-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  The effect of gender interactions on students' physical examination ratings in objective structured clinical examination stations.

Authors:  Julie A Carson; Adam Peets; Vincent Grant; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jasminka M Vukanovic-Criley; Stuart Criley; Carole Marie Warde; John R Boker; Lempira Guevara-Matheus; Winthrop Hallowell Churchill; William P Nelson; John Michael Criley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-27

3.  Effects of student gender and standardized-patient gender in a single case using a male and a female standardized patient.

Authors:  G Furman; J A Colliver; A Galofré
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Gender bias in the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  J B Lehmann; P S Wehner; C U Lehmann; L M Savory
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina.

Authors:  V L Roger; M E Farkouh; S A Weston; G S Reeder; S J Jacobsen; A R Zinsmeister; B P Yawn; S L Kopecky; S E Gabriel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency.

Authors:  S Mangione; L Z Nieman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?

Authors:  Susan Humphrey-Murto; Claire Touchie; Timothy J Wood; Sydney Smee
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Sex and gender bias in anatomy and physical diagnosis text illustrations.

Authors:  K D Mendelsohn; L Z Nieman; K Isaacs; S Lee; S P Levison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The rational clinical examination. Is this patient having a myocardial infarction?

Authors:  A A Panju; B R Hemmelgarn; G H Guyatt; D L Simel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does patient's sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Desirée Loikas; Linnéa Karlsson; Mia von Euler; Karin Hallgren; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Pia Bastholm Rahmner
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 2.  Sex-Gender Variable: Methodological Recommendations for Increasing Scientific Value of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Ilaria Campesi; Delia Colombo; Paola Antonini
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.