UNLABELLED: The type IV dental stone is widely used for the fabrication of dyes and master casts for fixed and removable partial prostheses. It is typically normal to wait at least 24 hours for the casts to dry prior to beginning the laboratory procedures. The waiting time has been shown to be greatly reduced by using microwave drying. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of drying techniques at room temperature and microwave oven on the linear dimensional change, compressive strength and detail reproduction in type IV dental stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three type IV dental stone brands were selected; elite Rock, Shera Premium and Durone IV. Two different drying protocols were tested in 4 groups (n=10); G-room temperature (25±4 ºC) dried for 2 hours; G2--room temperature dried for 24 hours; G3-room temperature dried for 7 days and G4--microwave oven dried at 800 W for 5 minutes and after 2 hours at room temperature. After drying, the samples were assayed for dimensional charges. The sample surface was submitted to the ImageTool 3.0 software for compressive strength in a universal testing machine with a cell load of 50 KN at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minutes and the detail reproduction was analyzed with a stereomicroscope at 25x magnification. The statistical analysis of the linear dimensional change and compressive strength data were conducted by the ANOVA test followed by the Tukey test (p<0.05). Detailed reproduction values were reported in percentages. RESULTS: For the compressive strength test, Elite Rock and Durone IV did not present significant differences between G2 and G4, while Shera Premium did not present differences between G3 and G4. The best reproduction levels were observed for G3. CONCLUSIONS: Dental stone microwave oven drying showed a linear dimensional change similar to after room temperature drying for 24 hours and 7 days. The compressive strength of the stone dried in the microwave oven was similar to those dried at room temperature for 24 hours, with the exception of Shera Premium, which had similar results for microwave and room temperature drying for 7 days. For the microwave drying method the detail reproduction levels for samples dried at room temperature for 24 hours and 7 days were similar, except for the Durone IV.
UNLABELLED: The type IV dental stone is widely used for the fabrication of dyes and master casts for fixed and removable partial prostheses. It is typically normal to wait at least 24 hours for the casts to dry prior to beginning the laboratory procedures. The waiting time has been shown to be greatly reduced by using microwave drying. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of drying techniques at room temperature and microwave oven on the linear dimensional change, compressive strength and detail reproduction in type IV dental stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three type IV dental stone brands were selected; elite Rock, Shera Premium and Durone IV. Two different drying protocols were tested in 4 groups (n=10); G-room temperature (25±4 ºC) dried for 2 hours; G2--room temperature dried for 24 hours; G3-room temperature dried for 7 days and G4--microwave oven dried at 800 W for 5 minutes and after 2 hours at room temperature. After drying, the samples were assayed for dimensional charges. The sample surface was submitted to the ImageTool 3.0 software for compressive strength in a universal testing machine with a cell load of 50 KN at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minutes and the detail reproduction was analyzed with a stereomicroscope at 25x magnification. The statistical analysis of the linear dimensional change and compressive strength data were conducted by the ANOVA test followed by the Tukey test (p<0.05). Detailed reproduction values were reported in percentages. RESULTS: For the compressive strength test, Elite Rock and Durone IV did not present significant differences between G2 and G4, while Shera Premium did not present differences between G3 and G4. The best reproduction levels were observed for G3. CONCLUSIONS: Dental stone microwave oven drying showed a linear dimensional change similar to after room temperature drying for 24 hours and 7 days. The compressive strength of the stone dried in the microwave oven was similar to those dried at room temperature for 24 hours, with the exception of Shera Premium, which had similar results for microwave and room temperature drying for 7 days. For the microwave drying method the detail reproduction levels for samples dried at room temperature for 24 hours and 7 days were similar, except for the Durone IV.
Stone casts are key materials in the dental laboratory and clinical practice and must
accurately reproduce the structures obtained from the impressions. To accomplish this,
accuracy techniques and appropriate materials are required. The type IV dental stone is
widely used to fabricate the dyes and master casts for fixed and removable partial
prostheses, due to its superior mechanical properties such as compressive strength,
hardness and expansion properties when compared to other dental stones[10].It is essential to obtain a strong cast with smooth and hard surface characteristics in
order to allow for wax sculpting, especially at the cervical margin without cast
abrasion. A hard surface is necessary for a dye stone to be resistant to abrasion,
because the cavity preparation is filled with wax that is carved flush with the margins
of the dye. The average dry surface Hockwell hardness of the Type IV stone is
approximately 92 and for the Type III is 82. Even though the Type IV stone is harder,
care should be observed when the wax pattern is being carved[9]. The mechanical properties of dental stone products are
related to the water/powder ratio, mixing time, mixing volume, chemical composition,
relative humidity, room temperature at which the material is stored and the remaining
residual water, as well as the setting time[5].Reports in the literature recommend waiting from 24 to 48 hours after the stone cast has
set prior to prosthetic handling[12].
However, in clinical practice sometimes it is necessary to handle the casts sooner after
their fabrication. These casts generally have a lower surface strength and hardness, and
therefore are considered unsuitable[7,10]. The removal of all residual water in
the cast by drying at room temperature is required to obtain adequate dental stone
mechanical properties for the cast use. The gypsum is stable only below 40ºC and drying
at higher temperatures should be carefully managed since this may cause higher
shrinkage, compressive strength reduction and promote cracks in the cast[6].Microwave radiation has been widely accepted in dentistry for the acrylic resins
disinfection[2,4,12]. It has been
shown that stone casts can be dehydrated in a microwave oven as an alternative drying
method. This technique increased the casts' mechanical properties at room
temperature[3]. The aim of this
study was to evaluate and compare the compressive strength, dimensional stability and
detail reproduction of three type IV dental stone materials following different drying
techniques that employed laboratory room temperatures and microwave ovens. The null
hypothesis was that microwave dehydration would not adversely affect these
properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three type IV dental stones were selected: Durone IV (Dentsply, Petrópolis, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil), Elite Rock (Zhermack, Rovigo, Vêneto, Italy) and Shera Premium (Shera
Werkstoff-Tecnologie, Lemforde, Niedersachsen, Germany). All materials were mixed
mechanically under vacuum, following the water/powder ratio recommended by the
manufacturers. The stone cast was immediately poured into the mold with the aid of a
mechanical vibrator.Two different drying protocols for linear dimensional change, compressive strength and
detail reproduction tests of the stone casts were used and divided into four groups: G1
- room temperature (25±4ºC) dried for 2 hours; G2 - room temperature dried for 24 hours;
G3 - room temperature dried for 7 days and G4 - microwave oven dried at 800 W for 5
minutes after 2 hours at room temperature. A cup with 200 ml of distilled water was
placed in the microwave to protect the magnetron[10].
Linear dimensional change
For the analysis of the linear dimensional change, forty samples were used for each
stone brand and divided into four groups (n=10). A metallic matrix was used with two
series of seven slots with depths ranging from 0.025 to 0.300 mm and 2.5 mm of
distance between the grooves, made in accordance with the specification #25 of the
American Dental Association (ADA)[9].
A PVC tube 30 mm in diameter and 15 mm high was placed on the metal matrix so that
the slot of 0.050 mm deep remained in the center of the ring. The stone was weighed
on an analytical balance (Sauter, model K1200, Basel, Switzerland), mixed with
deionized water and measured with a test tube, in accordance to the ratio recommended
by the manufacturers, and then handled mechanically by vacuum (Multivac 4, Degussa,
Hanau, Hessen, Germany) with a speed of 450 rpm for 30 seconds. After mixing, the
stone was poured inside the ring previously isolated with petroleum gel, under
vibration. After 2 hours, the samples were removed from the PVC tube and the surface
was subjected to the scanner (HP Scanjet 2410, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) with a
resolution of 1200 dpi and analyzed with the ImageTool 3.0 software. For the image
calibration, the distance between lines 1 and 5 was used, comprised of a 10-mm
distance between them (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Sample used for software analysis of dimensional change. Black line indicates
calibrated scale and blue line the measurement of the sample
Sample used for software analysis of dimensional change. Black line indicates
calibrated scale and blue line the measurement of the sample
Compressive strength
For the compressive strength test, forty samples were prepared and separated into 4
groups (n=10). Specification #25 of the ADA[9] provides samples of 40 mm in length and 20 mm in diameter.
However, in the present study metal molds were used with 20 mm in length and 10 mm in
diameter, maintaining the length-diameter ratio recommended by the ADA[9]. The metal molds were used to obtain
the dyes made by polydimethylsiloxane (Optosil Comfort, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau,
Hessen, Germany), in which the samples were made with stone. The stone was weighed on
an analytical balance (Sauter, model K1200, Basel, Switzerland) and mixed with
deionized water measured with a test tube, in accordance to the manufacturer's
recommendations and handled mechanically by vacuum (Multivac 4, Degussa, Hanau,
Hessen, Germany) with a speed of 450 rpm for 30 seconds. The silicone dyes were
placed on a glass plate and filled with stone using a mechanical vibrator (Vibrator
GC, MEG Chemical Co. Ltd., Shangai, China). After filling the mold, another glass
plate was placed over the stone so that the ends of the sample remained flattened.
The samples (Figure 2) were tested in a
universal testing machine (Instron 4411, Corona, California, USA) with a cell load of
5 kN at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min.
Figure 2
Sample used for compressive strength test
Sample used for compressive strength test
Detail reproduction
For the analysis of detail reproduction, forty samples were used for each stone
brand, which were divided into four groups (n=10). To make the samples the same
metallic matrix was used as in the dimensional change test. According to the American
Dental Association (ADA)[9] (1981), a
detailed reproduction is considered satisfactory when a copy line of 0.050 mm in
diameter is reproduced continuously across the stone cast.A PVC tube was placed on the matrix (30 mm diameter, 15 mm high), so that the groove
on the metal matrix of 0.050 mm in depth was located in the center of the ring
diameter. After mixing under vacuum, the stone was poured inside the ring previously
isolated with petroleum gel, under vibration. After two hours, the samples (Figure 3) were removed from the PVC tube and the
surface conditions examined with a stereomicroscope (XLT30, Nova Optical Systems,
Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil) at 25x magnification.
Figure 3
Graphic with the results of the details reproduction (%)
Graphic with the results of the details reproduction (%)
Statistical analysis
The results of the linear dimensional change and compressive strength were subjected
to the ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (p<0.05). The values of the reproduction
of details were given as a percentage.
RESULTS
The variance analysis of the linear dimensional change test showed the dental stone
(p=0.00023) and time (p=0.00001) as significant factors, together with a stone-time
interaction (p=0.04924). The data are shown in Table
1.
Table 1
Variance analysis
Df
Sum of squares
Mean square
F value
Stone
2
0.00163
0.00081
10.213
Time
3
0.01048
0.00349
43.749
Stone X Time
6
0.00104
0.00017
2.18
Error
108
0.00862
0.00007
Variance analysisThe linear dimensional change results for the drying method are illustrated in Table 2. For the Elite Rock, G1 showed the highest
level of dimensional expansion, which was statistically higher than the other groups.
For G2, G3 and G4, Elite Rock did not show statistically significant differences. G1
demonstrated no significant differences. For G2 and G3, Durone IV had the highest levels
of expansion and for G4, Shera Premium presented the lowest expansion.
Table 2
Mean linear dimensional change (mm), standard deviation and percentage of
dimensional change as function of the drying method and stone type
Dental Stone
G1
G2
G3
G4
Elite Rock
10.034±0.007aA 0.34%
10.016±0.005bB 0.16%
10.010±0.007bB 0.10%
10.013±0.031aB 0.13%
Shera Premium
10.032±0.007aA 0.32%
10.012±0.006bB 0.12%
10.010±0.004bB 0.10%
10.005±0.010bB 0.05%
Durone IV
10.032±0.009aA 0.32%
10.023±0.004aB 0.23%
10.016±0.010aB 0.16%
10.015±0.007aB 0.15%
Mean linear dimensional change (mm), standard deviation and percentage of
dimensional change as function of the drying method and stone type
Mean linear dimensional change (mm), standard deviation and percentage of
dimensional change as function of the drying method and stone typeMean linear dimensional change (mm), standard deviation and percentage of
dimensional change as function of the drying method and stone typeVariance analysis of the compressive strength test showed that the stone (p=0.00001) and
time (p=0.00001) were significant factors and that there is a stone-time interaction
(p=0.00314). The data are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Variance analysis
Df
Sum of squares
Mean square
F value
Stone
2
3164,17
1582,08
55,1
Time
3
12169,85
4056,61
141,3
Stone x Time
6
617,07
102,84
3,58
Error
108
3100,45
28,7
Variance analysisTable 4 shows the compressive strength values for the different drying methods. G1 with
Elite Rock presented the lowest values of compressive strength. G2 and G4 did not show
statistically significant differences. G3 showed significantly higher compressive
strength values than G1, G2 and G4. Stone Shera Premium had the highest strength in G3
and G4, with no statistical difference between these groups. Lower strength values are
found in G1 and intermediate values in G2. The Durone IV stone showed the highest
compressive strength values in G3 and the lowest values in G1. No statistically
significant differences were found between G4 and G2. When the cast brands were
compared, Elite Rock showed the highest compressive strengths for G1, G2 and G3. For G4,
the Durone IV stone had the lowest compressive strength values.
Table 4
Mean values of compressive strength (MPa) and standard deviation as function of
the interaction of the drying method and stone type
Dental Stone
G1
G2
G3
G4
Elite Rock
32.18±3.2aC
47.29±2.25aB
61.30±1.96aA
45.72±3.26aB
Shera Premium
21.65±4.29bC
37.70±6.32bB
43.03±7.19bA
43.18±5.76aA
Durone IV
18.87±2.8bC
38.16±6.30bB
45.48±6.12bA
34.23±4.04bB
Means followed by different small letters in each column and different capital
letters in each row differ statistically by Tukey test (5%)
Mean values of compressive strength (MPa) and standard deviation as function of
the interaction of the drying method and stone typeMeans followed by different small letters in each column and different capital
letters in each row differ statistically by Tukey test (5%)The test results for detail reproduction according to the drying method used are shown
in Figure 3 as percentages. Detail reproduction
can be considered satisfactory when the cast maintains the continuous 0.050 mm line of
the matrix. After reviewing the reproductions with a stereomicroscope, the G1 drying
method presented the worst rates of reproduction for each cast. The highest reproduction
values were found for G3.
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to verify that the type IV dental stone drying in a microwave
oven to save time would not have a negative influence on the linear dimensional change,
compressive strength and detail reproduction of some commercial dental stones. The
results showed that the three brands of type IV dental stones were affected differently
by the drying methods. The null hypothesis that these properties would not be negatively
influenced by the microwave dehydration was accepted.The setting expansion of the dental stones is an important factor for many dental
applications. The casts must have slightly larger dimensions than the buccal structures
to offset the impression material shrinkage and then ensure that the dental pieces are
adequately manufactured. The dental stone expansion due to the calcium sulfate hydration
during the mix promotes the crystallization reaction where crystal growth occurs from
the crystallization nucleus, providing volumetric expansion that can range from 0.06 to
0.5%[1].ADA Specification #25 recommends a setting expansion of type IV dental stone up to 0.1%
at 2 hours after the mix. Another important fact to be considered is that the setting
expansion is inherent to the crystallization of the stone and occurs according to the
calcination process of the dental stone used to obtain the hemihydrates[9,10,15].The setting expansions obtained in this study for the samples subjected to drying at
room temperature and in a microwave oven for three different brands of dental stone were
higher than the values advertised on the product labels. The three brands showed no
statistically significant difference between expansion levels for G2, G3 and G4, while
the highest expansion values were found in G1 (Table
2). The difference between the expansion mentioned by the manufacturer and
those obtained in this study could be due to the environmental conditions of the
laboratory, where the samples were prepared in a room with no temperature and humidity
control, purposely to establish an environmental similarity to the clinical or
prosthetic laboratory conditions.The strength of gypsum-based products is usually expressed in terms of compressive
strength, which is directly related to the material's ability to fracture resistance
when subjected to compressive tensions. This mechanical property is linked to other
important cast properties, especially hardness and wear strength. Thus, the dental stone
compressive strength is an important factor in the rehabilitation work in dentistry.The compressive strength values found for the different drying techniques (Table 4) indicate that the casts dehydrated in a
microwave oven at 2 hours (G4) after mixing showed average values of compressive
strength with no statistical differences when compared with those dried at room
temperature for 7 days (G3, Shera Premium) and with no statistical difference from
samples dried at room temperature for 24 hours (G2) for Elite Rock and Durone IV.
Similar results were found in the study by Tuncer, et al.[14] (1993), who evaluated drying techniques that employed a
microwave oven and conventional oven during the times of 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours. However,
the data were different from those found by Leubke and Schneider[8] (1985) who evaluated eight brands of type
IV dental stones dried in a microwave oven with 1450 W for 5 minutes. These authors
found no statistically significant differences between the compressive strength values
for the samples dried in a microwave oven and at room temperature, considering that this
result may have been influenced by the use of high-power microwaves. The samples dried
in a microwave oven and at room temperature for 24 hours and 7 days demonstrated
statistically similar compressive strength values, suggesting that the casts could be
used for prosthetic processing two hours after impression pouring.Hersek, et al.[6] (2002) analyzed the
diametral tensile strength of casts that were dried in a microwave oven at 10 minutes
after the initial setting and concluded that drying increased the dental stone strength
by quick water evaporation that remains in the mass, due to the heat produced by the
microwave radiation. Times between 10 and 60 minutes before drying in the microwave oven
were also tested in this study to observe the dental stone dehydration. For these times,
casts dried in a microwave oven showed low compression strength, fracturing easily with
little charge, justifying the two-hour time chosen before microwave drying samples for
the compressive strength test.The detail reproduction quality of stone casts can be influenced by the size and
regularity of the calcium sulfate α-hemihydrate particles. The Elite Rock and Shera
Premium brands proved to be consistently less viscous when compared with the Durone IV,
that may have influenced the material flow on the metal matrix, allowing the easier
penetration of the dental stone and consequently better reproduction of the 0.050 mm
line.Due to the absence of further research in the literature about the detail reproduction
in casts that are dried in a microwave oven, it is not possible to establish parameters
for comparison with the results of this study. However, the results of the dimensional
change and compressive strength were consistent with the few studies reported in the
literature, also demonstrating the influence of microwave oven drying on the dehydration
of type IV dental stones[6,8,14,16]. The comparison of the dimensional
change and compressive strength results of the brands cannot be discussed since the
manufacturers did not provide the complete chemical composition of their products.However, the results of this study supported that the microwave drying method can be
used without causing deleterious effects on the linear dimensional, compression strength
and detail reproduction in the casts of type IV dental stones when compared to material
drying at room temperature.The limitations of this in vitro study includes the fact that there was
no information in relation to the clinical conditions that an indirect restoration
should present when manufactured in cast dried by the microwave procedure. This fact
should be a topic for further investigations.
CONCLUSION
It was concluded that: dental stone microwave oven drying showed a linear dimensional
change similar to after room temperature drying for 24 hours and 7 days. The compressive
strength of a stone dried in a microwave oven was similar to those dried at room
temperature for 24 hours, with the exception of Shera Premium, with similar results for
microwave and room temperature drying for 7 days. For the microwave drying method, the
detail reproduction levels for the samples dried at room temperature for 24 hours and 7
days were similar, except for the Durone IV.
Authors: Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani; Douglas Duenhas de Azevedo; Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita; Wilson Batista Mendes; Paulo César Saquy Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2009