OBJECTIVE: Determine the risk of late gastrointestinal (GI) and bladder toxicities in women treated for Stage I uterine cancer with postoperative beam, implant, or combination radiation. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry and Medicare claims were used to estimate the risk of developing late GI and bladder toxicities by type of radiation received. Bladder and GI diagnoses were identified 6-60 months after cancer diagnosis. Cox-proportional hazard models were used to estimate risk of any late GI or bladder toxicity due to type of radiation received. RESULTS: A total of 3,024 women with uterine cancer diagnosed from 1992-2005 were identified for analysis with a mean age of 73.9 (Standard Deviation (SD) ± 6.5). Bladder and GI toxicities occurred most frequently in the combination group, and least in the implant group. After controlling for demographic characteristics, tumor grade, diagnosis year, SEER region, comorbidities, prior GI and bladder diagnosis, and chemotherapy, women receiving implant radiation had a 21% absolute decrease in GI toxicities compared to women receiving combination radiation (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.92). No differences were observed between those receiving beam and combination in GI (HR 1.01 (0.89-1.14)) and bladder (HR 0.95 (0.80-1.11)) toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Older women receiving combined radiation had the highest rates of GI and bladder toxicities, while women receiving implant radiation alone had the lowest rates. When selecting type of radiation for a patient, these toxicities should be considered. Counseling older women surviving cancer on late toxicities due to radiation must be a priority for physicians caring for them.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the risk of late gastrointestinal (GI) and bladder toxicities in women treated for Stage I uterine cancer with postoperative beam, implant, or combination radiation. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry and Medicare claims were used to estimate the risk of developing late GI and bladder toxicities by type of radiation received. Bladder and GI diagnoses were identified 6-60 months after cancer diagnosis. Cox-proportional hazard models were used to estimate risk of any late GI or bladder toxicity due to type of radiation received. RESULTS: A total of 3,024 women with uterine cancer diagnosed from 1992-2005 were identified for analysis with a mean age of 73.9 (Standard Deviation (SD) ± 6.5). Bladder and GI toxicities occurred most frequently in the combination group, and least in the implant group. After controlling for demographic characteristics, tumor grade, diagnosis year, SEER region, comorbidities, prior GI and bladder diagnosis, and chemotherapy, women receiving implant radiation had a 21% absolute decrease in GI toxicities compared to women receiving combination radiation (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.92). No differences were observed between those receiving beam and combination in GI (HR 1.01 (0.89-1.14)) and bladder (HR 0.95 (0.80-1.11)) toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Older women receiving combined radiation had the highest rates of GI and bladder toxicities, while women receiving implant radiation alone had the lowest rates. When selecting type of radiation for a patient, these toxicities should be considered. Counseling older women surviving cancer on late toxicities due to radiation must be a priority for physicians caring for them.
Authors: Benjamin E Greer; Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Michael A Bookman; Robert E Bristow; Susana M Campos; Kathleen R Cho; Larry Copeland; Marta Ann Crispens; Patricia J Eifel; Warner K Huh; Wainwright Jaggernauth; Daniel S Kapp; John J Kavanagh; John R Lurain; Mark Morgan; Robert J Morgan; C Bethan Powell; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; Angeles Alvarez Secord; William Small; Nelson Teng Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Marcus A Crosby; Jonathan D Tward; Aniko Szabo; Christopher M Lee; David K Gaffney Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: D Chassagne; P Sismondi; J C Horiot; G Sinistrero; P Bey; P Zola; M Pernot; A Gerbaulet; I Kunkler; G Michel Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: R A Nout; V T H B M Smit; H Putter; I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; J J Jobsen; L C H W Lutgens; E M van der Steen-Banasik; J W M Mens; A Slot; M C Stenfert Kroese; B N F M van Bunningen; A C Ansink; W L J van Putten; C L Creutzberg Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sanjeev Kumar; Jay P Shah; Christopher S Bryant; Awoniyi O Awonuga; Anthony N Imudia; Julie J Ruterbusch; Michele L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Robert T Morris; John M Malone Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Floortje Mols; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Joke E Haartsen; Ad J J M Vingerhoets; Marnix L M Lybeert; Hetty A van den Berg; Jan Willem W Coebergh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 7.038