Literature DB >> 23137356

Lead level in seminal plasma may affect semen quality for men without occupational exposure to lead.

Hsien-Ming Wu1, Dan-Tzu Lin-Tan, Mei-Li Wang, Hong-Yuan Huang, Chyi-Long Lee, Hsin-Shih Wang, Yung-Kuei Soong, Ja-Liang Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility affects approximately 10-15% of reproductive-age couples. Poor semen quality contributes to about 25% of infertile cases. Resulting from the direct effect on testicular function or hormonal alterations, heavy metals exposure has been related to impaired semen quality. The objective of this study was to assess the level of lead in the seminal plasma in men without occupational exposure to lead, and to determine the relationship between semen quality and lead concentration in the semen.
METHODS: This is a prospective and nonrandomized clinical study conducted in University infertility clinic and academic research laboratory. Three hundred and forty-one male partners of infertile couples undergoing infertility evaluation and management were recruited to the study. Semen samples collected for the analyses of semen quality were also used for the measurement of lead concentrations. Semen samples were evaluated according to the WHO standards.
RESULTS: All subjects were married and from infertile couples without occupational exposure to lead. There is a significant inverse correlation between the lead concentration in seminal plasma and sperm count. A higher semen lead concentration was correlated with lower sperm count, but not with semen volume, sperm motility or sperm morphology as assessed by simple linear regression.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that semen lead concentration was significantly higher among the patients with lower sperm count. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a high level of lead accumulation in semen may reduce the sperm count contributing to infertility of men without occupational exposure to lead.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23137356      PMCID: PMC3520831          DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol        ISSN: 1477-7827            Impact factor:   5.211


Background

Infertility affects approximately 10–15% of reproductive-age couples. Poor semen quality contributes to about 25% of infertile cases [1]. The causes of poor semen quality is complex. An increasing number of reports suggest that the environmental, industrial and dietary agents may affect male fertility in human [2-5]. The evidences for decreasing quality of semen in men during the past 50 years are significant [6,7]. This semen quality decline has been suggested to be associated with exposure to the environmental, industrial and dietary toxins. An increase in the human population, rapid industrialization, and motorized vehicular traffic are believed to be responsible for the increased release of toxic metals into the environment. Heavy metals are possible pollutants that may be harmful to semen quality [8]. Lead exposure can cause adverse effects on both male and female reproductive systems. Lead in seminal plasma may be increased by high local environmental, industrial and dietary exposure. Resulting from the direct effect on testicular function or hormonal alterations, heavy metals exposure has been related to impaired semen quality [9,10]. Blood tests of heavy metals levels have been believed to the standard procedures for the exposure index in toxicological studies, but recent data suggest that it may be inadequate to reveal heavy metals accumulation in the male reproductive tract. Therefore, heavy metals concentrations in seminal plasma could provide a better evaluation of the effects of heavy metals exposure in reproduction [11,12]. An increasing exposure to the environmental, industrial and dietary toxins is believed to be related to poor semen quality. Our study's primary purpose is to determine whether semen concentration of lead in men without occupational exposure to lead is associated with semen quality and reproductive outcome.

Methods

Study populations

Three hundred and forty-one male partners of infertile couples attending the reproductive center of Lin-Kou medical center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and undergoing infertility evaluation were recruited to the study. A questionnaire survey collected data regarding patient occupation, smoking status, body height, body weight, marital status, infertility history and other patient data. Patients with a history of heavy metals exposure or who resided in areas known to have heavy metals contamination were excluded from this study. Semen samples collected for the analyses of semen quality were also used for the measurement of metal concentrations. All samples were collected by masturbation after 3 to 5 days of sexual abstinence. The medical charts of patients were reviewed. All data collection was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB number: 98-3916B).

Semen analysis

Routine semen analysis was performed to assess sperm quality parameters, including semen quantity, sperm count, sperm motility, and sperm morphology according to the World Health Organization (WHO) method [13], after liquefaction at 37°C for 30 min and within 1 h of semen collection. The criteria for normozoospermia were a concentration of ≧ 15 × 106/ml, with sperms of progressive motility more than 32% of spermatozoa, and normal morphology with oval-shaped head and no irregularities of tail in at least 30% of the spermatozoa.

Lead analyses

Approximately 100-μl of seminal plasma was digested with 500-μl of super-grade 0.8 M HNO3 in a glass tube. The residue was dissolved in 1 ml of 1% HNO3 and applied to a graphite tube for detection of lead by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Varian spectraAA 200Z, USA). The recovery of lead in spiked semen samples was 97%, respectively. The instrument was calibrated using 5, 10, and 15 μg/l standards for lead, respectively. A sample blank was prepared with each set of samples to control for possible metal contamination from external sources. The level of detection for lead was 0.1 μg/l, respectively. This study utilized both internal and external quality-control procedures, and obtained consistently satisfactory results. A certified commercially prepared product (Seronorm Trace Elements, Sero AS, Billingstads, Norway) was employed to check intra-batch accuracy and ensure inter-batch standardization. The coefficient of variation for lead measurement was ≤ 5.0%. External quality control was maintained via participation in two major programs: National Quality-Control Program conducted by the government, and the international program run by the College of American Pathologists.

Statistical analysis

The Cox proportional-hazards model was employed to determine the significance of the variables for predicting the pregnancy during the study period. The differences between the two groups were analyzed with a Chi-square test combined with a Fisher test, and Student's t-test. The Mann–Whitney U test was employed for data that were not normally distributed. A simple and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to identify the relationship between seminal plasma lead concentrations and other variables. All P values were two-tailed, and all results are presented as means±SD. The P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics

Three hundred and forty-one males comforming to the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study. Demographic characteristics for all subjects are presented in Table 1. The males ranged in age from 28 to 44 years with a mean age of 34.9 (S.D. = 3.7). The mean body mass index of the subjects was 22.6 (S.D.=1.6). The mean semen volume of the subjects was 3.0 ml, mean sperm concentration was 63.4 ×106/ml and the average percentage of total progressively motile sperm was 60.1%. The average lead concentration was 2.19 μg/l as shown in Table 1. All subjects were married and infertile couples without occupational exposure to lead.
Table 1

The base-line characteristics of study patients (n=341)

VariablesMean± standard deviation (range) or number (%)
Age (Y/O)
34.9±3.7 (28–44)
Body mass index(kg/m2)
22.6±1.6 (19.2-26.1)
Smoking
157 (46.0%)
Semen lead conc.(μg/l)
2.19±1.45 (0.08-9.50)
Semen volume (ml)
3.0±1.2 (0.3-8.0)
Sperm count (x106)
63.4±49.6 (0.0-368.0)
Sperm motility (%)
60.1±20.2 (0.0-97.4)
Sperm morphology (%)58.0±17.8(0.0-94.9)
The base-line characteristics of study patients (n=341)

Lead concentration and semen quality

There is a significant inverse correlation between the lead concentration in seminal plasma and sperm count described in Table 2. A higher semen lead concentration was correlated with lower sperm count, but not with semen volume, sperm motility or sperm morphology as assessed by simple linear regression in Table 2.
Table 2

The relations between semen lead concentrations and semen volume, sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology assessed by simple linear regression (N=341)

VariablesR valuesP
Age (Y/O)
−0.011
0.8443
Body mass index(kg/m2)
0.105
0.0529
Semen amount (ml)
0.037
0.4964
Sperm count (x106)
0.130
0.0165
Sperm motility (%)
0.004
0.9448
Sperm morphology (%)0.0020.9755
The relations between semen lead concentrations and semen volume, sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology assessed by simple linear regression (N=341)

Sperm count and lead concentration

After adjusting age, body-mass index and smoking by multiple linear regressions, Table 3 showed that sperm count did not correlate with age, body-mass index and smoking but with semen lead concentration (beta coefficients: -4.44±1.87, P=0.0181). After assessing by simple linear regression analysis, Figure 1 demonstrated that the sperm count was negatively associated with semen lead concentration (r=0.130, P=0.0165).
Table 3

The relations between sperm count and semen lead concentrations after adjusted age, body-mass index and smoking by multiple linear regressions (N=341)

VariablesBeta coefficients± SE (standard error)P
Age (Y/O)
1.1±0.7
0.1433
Body mass index(kg/m2)
0.4±2.3
0.8514
Smoking
−0.2±5.6
0.9699
Semen lead−4.44±1.870.0181
Figure 1

The relation between sperm count and semen lead concentration (assessed by simple linear regression analysis, r=0.130; p=0.0165; N=341).

The relations between sperm count and semen lead concentrations after adjusted age, body-mass index and smoking by multiple linear regressions (N=341) The relation between sperm count and semen lead concentration (assessed by simple linear regression analysis, r=0.130; p=0.0165; N=341).

Discussion

To obtain an accurate characterization of a male fertility status, semen analysis is a well established procedure. The basic semen analysis measures sperm concentration, sperm motility, and sperm morphology. To elucidate semen abnormalities, further evaluation is necessary to interpret the defect. Several environmental and endocrine factors may cause male infertility. The goal of the study is to evaluate the level of lead in the seminal plasma in male partners of infertile couples undergoing infertility evaluation, and to observe the association among sperm quality, pregnancy rate and lead concentration in the semen. The major finding in the study is that lead concentration in the seminal plasma contributes to the poor sperm count in the patients undergoing infertility evaluation and treatment. The patients in this study had no histories of lead poisoning or occupational exposure to lead. This indicates that chronic systemic low-level exposure to environmental toxicants such as lead may damage the reproductive function in general population. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that low level of lead accumulation in seminal plasma may affect sperm amount for men without occupational exposure to lead. Exposure to environmental toxicants may result in poor-quality gametes and aneuploidy in gametes [14,15]. Some studies demonstrated that lead may lessen normal sperm metabolism through suppressing the sperm creatine kinase, contributing to infertility in men [16]. The relationship between such exposures and poor-quality gametes needs to be addressed in future study. The previous studies demonstrated that the infertile couples without occupational exposure to lead exhibited high blood lead concentrations, attributable to poor IVF outcome related to poor oocyte quality and altered sperm function [17-19]. Some studies indicated that effects of smoking on blood lead levels in workers may affect semen quality [20]. However, the mechanisms of the actions underlying its toxic effects on male reproductive ability remain controversial. The gonadotropins bind specific receptors on the reproductive cell surface to stimulate gonadal steroidogenesis and gametegenesis. Since these receptors for gonadotropins are localized on the surface of the cell membrane, membrane integrity is important for gonadotropic binding, steroidogenesis, and gamete growth. The lead concentration in the tissue could affect hormone receptor kinetics, enzyme activities and hormone secretion [3]. Although environmental exposure to lead may impair spermatogenesis, as shown in several animal studies [3,21], similar data in human are generally limited. The above-mentioned data demonstrate that heavy metals intoxication alters steroidgenesis and gamete growth. Environmental low-level exposure to lead is a rising health issue, and more studies are encouraged to elucidate the lowest adverse effects of lead concentrations in biological fluids and tissue levels. The threshold level has been difficult to establish due to the selection of the exposure indicator and the reproductive endpoints [22]. Lead can be measured in reproductive organs, including prostate and seminal vesicles. Lead appears to accumulate in the epididymis, however, the distribution of lead in male reproductive tracts has not been well established. The association observed in our study between lead in semen compartments and sperm count is significant. The association between lead concentration in semen and sperm count may result from lead-detrimental spermatogenesis rather than lead-altered hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function [23]. Further studies are required to verify the impact of lead on semen environment and spermatogenesis. Although blood lead level reflects recent exposure to lead, it is unclear whether the adverse health effects of lead that are observed are related to current or cumulative exposures. The previous studies indicate that workers exposed to lead had lower sperm count and higher teratozospermia count [24,25]. An negative correlation between blood lead concentrations and poor semen quality has been shown [17]. However, no association was observed between seminal plasma lead concentrations and semen quality in some studies [8,26]. The possible factors for the drawbacks are limited detecting methods and less sensitive examinations of environmental effects in seminal plasma lead concentrations. The results of the current study draw a more definite conclusion on the relationship between seminal plasma lead concentrations and sperm count in men without occupational exposure to lead.

Conclusions

In summary, this is the first study to demonstrate that lead accumulation in semen may reduce the sperm count contributing to infertility of men without occupational exposure to lead. Our results suggest that efforts to reduce potential sources of environmental lead exposure may improve the fertile ability in infertility couples. Effects of potential reproductive toxicants such as lead on reproductive ability is difficult to determine due to varying lead sensitivity, duration of exposure, and tissue concentration. Further studies are required to clarify the complicated mechanisms of environmental exposure to lead and male infertility in general population.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HMW, HYH, CLL, HSW, YKS and JLL participated in the design of the study and in developing the research; HMW, DTLT, MLW, HYH, CLL, HSW, YKS and JLL conducted the study at the outpatient clinic, and at the laboratory. All the authors contributed equally in writing the manuscript and in reviewing and revising it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  25 in total

1.  Administration of cyclophosphamide at different stages of follicular maturation in mice: effects on reproductive performance and fetal malformations.

Authors:  D Meirow; M Epstein; H Lewis; D Nugent; R G Gosden
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The association of age and semen quality in healthy men.

Authors:  B Eskenazi; A J Wyrobek; E Sloter; S A Kidd; L Moore; S Young; D Moore
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.

Authors:  E Carlsen; A Giwercman; N Keiding; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-12

4.  Study of sperm characteristics in persons occupationally exposed to lead.

Authors:  D Lerda
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  In vitro effect of lead, silver, tin, mercury, indium and bismuth on human sperm creatine kinase activity: a presumable mechanism for men infertility.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ghaffari; Behrooz Motlagh
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2011

6.  Lead concentrations in semen of healthy men without occupational exposure to lead.

Authors:  M M Plechaty; B Noll; F W Sunderman
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.256

7.  Sperm morphological defects related to environment, lifestyle and medical history of 1001 male partners of pregnant women from four European cities.

Authors:  J Auger; F Eustache; A G Andersen; D S Irvine; N Jørgensen; N E Skakkebaek; J Suominen; J Toppari; M Vierula; P Jouannet
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Male infertility and environmental exposure to lead and cadmium.

Authors:  S Benoff; A Jacob; I R Hurley
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Semen quality of male smokers and nonsmokers in infertile couples.

Authors:  Robert Künzle; Michael D Mueller; Willy Hänggi; Martin H Birkhäuser; Heinz Drescher; Nick A Bersinger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Lead, reproduction and development.

Authors:  C Winder
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  1993 Summer-Fall       Impact factor: 4.294

View more
  8 in total

1.  Role of low exposure to metals as male reproductive toxicants.

Authors:  Hueiwang Anna Jeng; Yeou-Lih Huang; Chih-Hong Pan; Norou Diawara
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Newborns and low to moderate prenatal environmental lead exposure: might fathers be the key?

Authors:  Esther García-Esquinas; Nuria Aragonés; Mario Antonio Fernández; José Miguel García-Sagredo; América de León; Concha de Paz; Ana María Pérez-Meixeira; Elisa Gil; Andrés Iriso; Margot Cisneros; Amparo de Santos; Juan Carlos Sanz; José Frutos García; Ángel Asensio; Jesús Vioque; Gonzalo López-Abente; Jenaro Astray; Marina Pollán; Mercedes Martínez; María José González; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The Impact of the Flint Water Crisis on Fertility.

Authors:  Daniel S Grossman; David J G Slusky
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2019-12

4.  Association of peripubertal blood lead levels with reproductive hormones and semen parameters in a longitudinal cohort of Russian men.

Authors:  Paige L Williams; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Susan A Korrick; Mary M Lee; Bora Plaku-Alakbarova; Jane S Burns; Luidmila Smigulina; Yury Dikov; Ramy Abou Ghayda; Russ Hauser; Oleg Sergeyev
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Association of Blood and Seminal Plasma Cadmium and Lead Levels With Semen Quality in Non-Occupationally Exposed Infertile Men in Abakaliki, South East Nigeria.

Authors:  Ademola C Famurewa; Emmanuel I Ugwuja
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2017-06

6.  Anemia risk in relation to lead exposure in lead-related manufacturing.

Authors:  Nan-Hung Hsieh; Shun-Hui Chung; Szu-Chieh Chen; Wei-Yu Chen; Yi-Hsien Cheng; Yi-Jun Lin; Su-Han You; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Childhood lead biokinetics and associations with age among a group of lead-poisoned children in China.

Authors:  Aaron J Specht; Marc Weisskopf; Linda H Nie
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Determinants of Erythrocyte Lead Levels in 454 Adults in Florence, Italy.

Authors:  Saverio Caini; Benedetta Bendinelli; Giovanna Masala; Calogero Saieva; Melania Assedi; Andrea Querci; Thomas Lundh; Soterios A Kyrtopoulos; Domenico Palli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.