Literature DB >> 23136822

Anal bulking agents for faecal incontinence.

N F S Watson1, A Koshy, P M Sagar.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to assess and evaluate reports of studies on the efficacy of anal bulking agents used in the treatment of faecal incontinence. A systematic review of the literature was carried out to identify studies that have reported on the use of anal bulking agents. A variety of biomaterials have been employed for anal bulking. These include autologous fat, bovine glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen, carbon-coated zirconium oxide beads, dextranomer microspheres in a gel, hydrogel cross-linked with polyacrylamide, polydimethylsiloxane elastomer in a gel, porcine dermal collagen and synthetic calcium hydroxylapatitie ceramic microspheres. Although the ideal site of injection (submucosal or intramuscular) and the mechanism of action remain the subject of debate, most published studies report a significant improvement in continence in at least 50% of subjects with mild to moderate symptoms with little or no associated morbidity.We concluded that anal bulking agents may be used to alleviate symptoms of faecal seepage and soilage.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23136822     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

3.  Long-term evaluation of bulking agents for the treatment of fecal incontinence: clinical outcomes and ultrasound evidence.

Authors:  F Guerra; M La Torre; G Giuliani; D Coletta; S Amore Bonapasta; F Velluti; F La Torre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Clinical Challenges of Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hadie Razjouyan; Shanti Prasad; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09

Review 5.  Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K D Hong; J S Kim; W B Ji; J W Um
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Fecal Incontinence Symptoms and Impact in Older Versus Younger Women Seeking Care.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Christina T Blanchard; Alayne D Markland; Elena G Gibson; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 8.  Evidence-Based Update on Treatments of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The Gatekeeper™ for fecal incontinence: Another trial and error.

Authors:  Labib Al-Ozaibi; Yasmin Kazim; Wessam Hazim; Alya Al-Mazroui; Faisal Al-Badri
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-12

Review 10.  Anal Sphincter Augmentation Using Biological Material.

Authors:  Nasra N Alam; Sunil K Narang; Ferdinand Köckerling; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.