Literature DB >> 28251356

Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

K D Hong1, J S Kim1, W B Ji1, J W Um2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various bulking agents have been used to treat fecal incontinence. While short-term outcomes are attractive, there is still a lack of long-term data. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the midterm outcomes of treatment with injectable bulking agents and to identify predictive factors for improvement in incontinence.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms injection, bulking agents, and fecal incontinence. Studies with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. The improvement rate in incontinence was calculated by percent change in validated fecal incontinence score (FIS) following injection treatment. To explore the impact of predictive factors on improvement in incontinence, univariate meta-regressions were conducted using the random-effect model.
RESULTS: A total of 889 patients in 23 articles were included. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 23.7 months (95% CI 19.3-28.2). Eleven different bulking agents were used. Four validated FISs were used. The Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence score (CC-FIS) was used in 19 studies. Most studies reported a statistically significant improvement in FIS. The pooled mean preoperative CC-FIS (n = 637) was 12.4 (95% CI 11.4-13.3). The pooled mean CC-FIS at last follow-up (n = 590) was 7.7 (95% CI 6.1-9.3). The weighted mean difference in CC-FIS between preoperative visit and last follow-up was 4.9 (95% CI 4.0-5.8). Hence, the rate of improvement in incontinence was 39.5% based on CC-FIS. Meta-regression revealed that the perianal injection route and implants intact on endoanal ultrasonography were predictive of greater improvement in incontinence. The manometric data revealed that the initial increase in the mean resting pressure following injection was attenuated over time. The pooled rate of adverse events was 18.0% (95% CI 10.0-30.1). In most cases, adverse events were minor and resolved within a couple of weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of injectable bulking agents results in significant midterm improvement in FIS. Perianal injection route and implants intact on EAUS were predictive of higher improvement in incontinence. However, given the paucity of randomized controlled trials in the literature, further research is needed to improve the quality of the evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal incontinence; Injectable bulking agents; Midterm outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251356     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1593-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  33 in total

1.  Intersphincteric injected silicone biomaterial implants: a treatment for faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M M Soerensen; L Lundby; S Buntzen; S Laurberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Sphincter training or anal injections of dextranomer for treatment of anal incontinence: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Trond Dehli; Arvid Stordahl; Lars J Vatten; Pål R Romundstad; Kjersti Mevik; Ylva Sahlin; Rolv O Lindsetmo; Barthold Vonen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 4.  The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexandra K Macmillan; Arend E H Merrie; Roger J Marshall; Bryan R Parry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Efficacy and quality of life 2 years after treatment for faecal incontinence with injectable bulking agents.

Authors:  J Danielson; U Karlbom; T Wester; W Graf
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Anal submucosal carbon bead injection for treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Felix Aigner; Friedrich Conrad; Raimund Margreiter; Michael Oberwalder
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun

Review 8.  Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence.

Authors:  C Luo; C B Samaranayake; L D Plank; I P Bissett
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Injectable silicone biomaterial (PTQ) is more effective than carbon-coated beads (Durasphere) in treating passive faecal incontinence--a randomized trial.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan; H C H Yeh
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Perianal injection of autologous fat for treatment of sphincteric incontinence.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of GatekeeperTM prosthesis implantation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Loris Trenti; Sebastiano Biondo; Fernando Noguerales; Jesus Nomdedeu; Alba Coret; Roland Scherer; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Riccardo Frago; Esther Kreisler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration.

Authors:  Sadé L Assmann; Daniel Keszthelyi; Jos Kleijnen; Foteini Anastasiou; Elissa Bradshaw; Ann E Brannigan; Emma V Carrington; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Liora D A Ebben; Marc A Gladman; Yasuko Maeda; Jarno Melenhorst; Giovanni Milito; Jean W M Muris; Julius Orhalmi; Daniel Pohl; Yvonne Tillotson; Mona Rydningen; Saulius Svagzdys; Carolynne J Vaizey; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.866

Review 3.  Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence in adults: is it possible to define what to do in different clinical scenarios?

Authors:  A Muñoz-Duyos; L Lagares-Tena; Y Ribas; J C Baanante; A Navarro-Luna
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A short- and long-term follow-up study of intersphincteric NASHA Dx implants for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Ezra; J M Danielsson; W Graf
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Sphinkeeper™ for faecal incontinence: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M La Torre; G Lisi; G Milito; M Campanelli; I Clementi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.788

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.