Literature DB >> 23135573

Hypothesized role of pregnancy hormones on HER2+ breast tumor development.

Giovanna I Cruz1, María Elena Martínez, Loki Natarajan, Betsy C Wertheim, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Melissa Bondy, Adrian Daneri-Navarro, María Mercedes Meza-Montenegro, Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan, Abenaa Brewster, Pepper Schedin, Ian K Komenaka, J Esteban Castelao, Angel Carracedo, Carmen M Redondo, Patricia A Thompson.   

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence rates have declined among older but not younger women; the latter are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancers carrying a poor prognosis. Epidemiological evidence supports an increase in breast cancer incidence following pregnancy with risk elevated as much as 10 years post-partum. We investigated the association between years since last full-term pregnancy at the time of diagnosis (≤10 or >10 years) and breast tumor subtype in a case series of premenopausal Hispanic women (n = 627). Participants were recruited in the United States, Mexico, and Spain. Cases with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status, with one or more full-term pregnancies ≥1 year prior to diagnosis were eligible for this analysis. Cases were classified into three tumor subtypes according to hormone receptor (HR+ = ER+ and/or PR+; HR- = ER- and PR-) expression and HER2 status: HR+/HER2-, HER2+ (regardless of HR), and triple negative breast cancer. Case-only odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for HER2+ tumors in reference to HR+/HER2- tumors. Participants were pooled in a mixed-effects logistic regression model with years since pregnancy as a fixed effect and study site as a random effect. When compared to HR+/HER2- cases, women with HER2+ tumors were more likely be diagnosed in the post-partum period of ≤10 years (OR = 1.68; 95 % CI, 1.12-2.52). The effect was present across all source populations and independent of the HR status of the HER2+ tumor. Adjusting for age at diagnosis (≤45 or >45 years) did not materially alter our results (OR = 1.78; 95 % CI, 1.08-2.93). These findings support the novel hypothesis that factors associated with the post-partum breast, possibly hormonal, are involved in the development of HER2+ tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23135573      PMCID: PMC4054812          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2313-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  47 in total

1.  Transient increase in breast cancer risk after giving birth: postpartum period with the highest risk (Sweden).

Authors:  Qin Liu; Joanne Wuu; Mats Lambe; Shu-Feng Hsieh; Anders Ekbom; Chung-Cheng Hsieh
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Breast carcinoma etiology: current knowledge and new insights into the effects of reproductive and hormonal risk factors in black and white populations.

Authors:  D R Pathak; J R Osuch; J He
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Breast carcinoma presents a decade earlier in Mexican women than in women in the United States or European countries.

Authors:  S Rodríguez-Cuevas; C G Macías; D Franceschi; S Labastida
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992-1995.

Authors:  A N Hedeen; E White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The relation of reproductive factors to mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone; David R Doody; Benjamin O Anderson; Peggy L Porter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Dual effect of parity on breast cancer risk in African-American women.

Authors:  Julie R Palmer; Lauren A Wise; Nicholas J Horton; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities.

Authors:  Therese Sørlie
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13

10.  Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women.

Authors:  F Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Deregulating MYC in a model of HER2+ breast cancer mimics human intertumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tyler Risom; Xiaoyan Wang; Juan Liang; Xiaoli Zhang; Carl Pelz; Lydia G Campbell; Jenny Eng; Koei Chin; Caroline Farrington; Goutham Narla; Ellen M Langer; Xiao-Xin Sun; Yulong Su; Colin J Daniel; Mu-Shui Dai; Christiane V Löhr; Rosalie C Sears
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Reproductive factors, heterogeneity, and breast tumor subtypes in women of mexican descent.

Authors:  Maria Elena Martinez; Betsy C Wertheim; Loki Natarajan; Richard Schwab; Melissa Bondy; Adrian Daneri-Navarro; Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro; Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan; Abenaa Brewster; Ian K Komenaka; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Participation of low-income women in genetic cancer risk assessment and BRCA 1/2 testing: the experience of a safety-net institution.

Authors:  Ian K Komenaka; Jesse N Nodora; Lisa Madlensky; Lisa M Winton; Meredith A Heberer; Richard B Schwab; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-12-21

4.  Reproductive and hormonal risk profile according to language acculturation and country of residence in the Ella Binational Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Jesse N Nodora; Linda Gallo; Renee Cooper; Betsy C Wertheim; Loki Natarajan; Patricia A Thompson; Ian K Komenaka; Abenaa Brewster; Melissa Bondy; Adrian Daneri-Navarro; María Mercedes Meza-Montenegro; Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan; María Elena Martínez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristin N Anderson; Richard B Schwab; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Minouk J Schoemaker; Jianwen Cai; Jiawei Xu; Lauren B Wright; Mark N Brook; Michael E Jones; Hans-Olov Adami; Laura Baglietto; Kimberly A Bertrand; William J Blot; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Miren Dorronsoro; Laure Dossus; A Heather Eliassen; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Susan E Hankinson; Judy Hoffman-Bolton; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Cari M Kitahara; Susanna C Larsson; Martha Linet; Melissa A Merritt; Roger L Milne; Valeria Pala; Julie R Palmer; Petra H Peeters; Elio Riboli; Malin Sund; Rulla M Tamimi; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Giske Ursin; Lars Vatten; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Alicja Wolk; Wei Zheng; Clarice R Weinberg; Anthony J Swerdlow; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  The Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaboration: A Pooling Project of Studies Participating in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Minouk J Schoemaker; Lauren B Wright; Craig McGowan; Mark N Brook; Kathleen M McClain; Michael E Jones; Hans-Olov Adami; Claudia Agnoli; Laura Baglietto; Leslie Bernstein; Kimberly A Bertrand; William J Blot; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Lesley Butler; Yu Chen; Michele M Doody; Laure Dossus; A Heather Eliassen; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Susan E Hankinson; Judy Hoffman-Bolton; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Victoria A Kirsh; Cari M Kitahara; Woon-Puay Koh; Susanna C Larsson; Eiliv Lund; Huiyan Ma; Melissa A Merritt; Roger L Milne; Carmen Navarro; Kim Overvad; Kotaro Ozasa; Julie R Palmer; Petra H Peeters; Elio Riboli; Thomas E Rohan; Atsuko Sadakane; Malin Sund; Rulla M Tamimi; Antonia Trichopoulou; Lars Vatten; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Walter C Willett; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Dale P Sandler; Anthony J Swerdlow
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  ΔN63 suppresses the ability of pregnancy-identified mammary epithelial cells (PIMECs) to drive HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Eyermann; Jinyu Li; Evguenia M Alexandrova
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes.

Authors:  Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Carmen M Redondo; Manuel Calaza; Marcos Matabuena; Maria A Bermudez; Roman Perez-Fernandez; María Torres-Español; Ángel Carracedo; J Esteban Castelao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Contribution of an alveolar cell of origin to the high-grade malignant phenotype of pregnancy-associated breast cancer.

Authors:  S Haricharan; S M Hein; J Dong; M J Toneff; O H Aina; P H Rao; R D Cardiff; Y Li
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.