PURPOSE: Two allosteric modulators of the group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR5) were evaluated as positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands for mGluR1. METHODS: LY2428703, a full mGluR1 antagonist (IC(50) 8.9 nM) and partial mGluR5 antagonist (IC(50) 118 nM), and LSN2606428, a full mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonist (IC(50) 35.3 nM and 10.2 nM, respectively) were successfully labeled with (11)C and evaluated as radioligands for mGluR1. The pharmacology of LY2428703 was comprehensively assessed in vitro and in vivo, and its biodistribution was investigated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and by PET imaging in the rat. In contrast, LSN2606428 was only evaluated in vitro; further evaluation was stopped due to its unfavorable pharmacological properties and binding affinity. RESULTS: (11)C-LY2428703 showed promising characteristics, including: (1) high potency for binding to human mGluR1 (IC(50) 8.9 nM) with no significant affinity for other human mGlu receptors (mGluR2 through mGluR8); (2) binding to brain displaceable by administration of an mGluR1 antagonist; (3) only one major radiometabolite in both plasma and brain, with a negligible brain concentration (with 3.5 % of the total radioactivity in cerebellum) and no receptor affinity; (4) a large specific and displaceable signal in the mGluR1-rich cerebellum with no significant in vivo affinity for mGluR5, as shown by PET studies in rats; and (5) lack of substrate behavior for efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier, as shown by PET studies conducted in wild-type and knockout mice. CONCLUSION: (11)C-LY2428703, a new PET radioligand for mGluR1 quantification, displayed promising characteristics both in vitro and in vivo in rodents.
PURPOSE: Two allosteric modulators of the group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR5) were evaluated as positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands for mGluR1. METHODS:LY2428703, a full mGluR1 antagonist (IC(50) 8.9 nM) and partial mGluR5 antagonist (IC(50) 118 nM), and LSN2606428, a full mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonist (IC(50) 35.3 nM and 10.2 nM, respectively) were successfully labeled with (11)C and evaluated as radioligands for mGluR1. The pharmacology of LY2428703 was comprehensively assessed in vitro and in vivo, and its biodistribution was investigated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and by PET imaging in the rat. In contrast, LSN2606428 was only evaluated in vitro; further evaluation was stopped due to its unfavorable pharmacological properties and binding affinity. RESULTS:(11)C-LY2428703 showed promising characteristics, including: (1) high potency for binding to humanmGluR1 (IC(50) 8.9 nM) with no significant affinity for other human mGlu receptors (mGluR2 through mGluR8); (2) binding to brain displaceable by administration of an mGluR1 antagonist; (3) only one major radiometabolite in both plasma and brain, with a negligible brain concentration (with 3.5 % of the total radioactivity in cerebellum) and no receptor affinity; (4) a large specific and displaceable signal in the mGluR1-rich cerebellum with no significant in vivo affinity for mGluR5, as shown by PET studies in rats; and (5) lack of substrate behavior for efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier, as shown by PET studies conducted in wild-type and knockout mice. CONCLUSION:(11)C-LY2428703, a new PET radioligand for mGluR1 quantification, displayed promising characteristics both in vitro and in vivo in rodents.
Authors: Thomas Steckler; Ana F M Oliveira; Chistophe Van Dyck; Hansfried Van Craenendonck; Ana M A Mateus; Xavier Langlois; Anne S J Lesage; Jos Prickaerts Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2005-10-14 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Terence G Hamill; Stephen Krause; Christine Ryan; Celine Bonnefous; Steve Govek; T Jon Seiders; Nicholas D P Cosford; Jeffrey Roppe; Ted Kamenecka; Shil Patel; Raymond E Gibson; Sandra Sanabria; Kerry Riffel; Waisi Eng; Christopher King; Xiaoqing Yang; Mitchell D Green; Stacey S O'Malley; Richard Hargreaves; H Donald Burns Journal: Synapse Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Simon M Ametamey; Lea J Kessler; Michael Honer; Matthias T Wyss; Alfred Buck; Samuel Hintermann; Yves P Auberson; Fabrizio Gasparini; Pius A Schubiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: V Mutel; G J Ellis; G Adam; S Chaboz; A Nilly; J Messer; Z Bleuel; V Metzler; P Malherbe; E J Schlaeger; B S Roughley; R L Faull; J G Richards Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Rong Xu; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeih-San Liow; Masahiro Fujita; Mattia Veronese; Robert L Gladding; Denise Rallis-Frutos; Jinsoo Hong; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stefanie M A Willekens; Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; Philip Van Damme; Koen Van Laere Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jinsoo Hong; Shuiyu Lu; Rong Xu; Jeih-San Liow; Alicia E Woock; Kimberly J Jenko; Robert L Gladding; Sami S Zoghbi; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Rong Xu; Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Sami S Zoghbi; Robert L Gladding; Alicia E Woock; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Vanessa N Barth; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeih-San Liow; Eric Nisenbaum; Edward Siuda; Robert L Gladding; Denise Rallis-Frutos; Cheryl Morse; Johannes Tauscher; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 3.138