BACKGROUND: Protein ingestion after a single bout of resistance-type exercise stimulates net muscle protein accretion during acute postexercise recovery. Consequently, it is generally accepted that protein supplementation is required to maximize the adaptive response of the skeletal muscle to prolonged resistance-type exercise training. However, there is much discrepancy in the literature regarding the proposed benefits of protein supplementation during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to define the efficacy of protein supplementation to augment the adaptive response of the skeletal muscle to prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older populations. DESIGN: A systematic review of interventional evidence was performed through the use of a random-effects meta-analysis model. Data from the outcome variables fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass, type I and II muscle fiber cross-sectional area, and 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press strength were collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of dietary protein supplementation during prolonged (>6 wk) resistance-type exercise training. RESULTS: Data were included from 22 RCTs that included 680 subjects. Protein supplementation showed a positive effect for FFM (weighted mean difference: 0.69 kg; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.91 kg; P < 0.00001) and 1-RM leg press strength (weighted mean difference: 13.5 kg; 95% CI: 6.4, 20.7 kg; P < 0.005) compared with a placebo after prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older subjects. CONCLUSION: Protein supplementation increases muscle mass and strength gains during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in both younger and older subjects.
BACKGROUND: Protein ingestion after a single bout of resistance-type exercise stimulates net muscle protein accretion during acute postexercise recovery. Consequently, it is generally accepted that protein supplementation is required to maximize the adaptive response of the skeletal muscle to prolonged resistance-type exercise training. However, there is much discrepancy in the literature regarding the proposed benefits of protein supplementation during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to define the efficacy of protein supplementation to augment the adaptive response of the skeletal muscle to prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older populations. DESIGN: A systematic review of interventional evidence was performed through the use of a random-effects meta-analysis model. Data from the outcome variables fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass, type I and II muscle fiber cross-sectional area, and 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press strength were collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of dietary protein supplementation during prolonged (>6 wk) resistance-type exercise training. RESULTS: Data were included from 22 RCTs that included 680 subjects. Protein supplementation showed a positive effect for FFM (weighted mean difference: 0.69 kg; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.91 kg; P < 0.00001) and 1-RM leg press strength (weighted mean difference: 13.5 kg; 95% CI: 6.4, 20.7 kg; P < 0.005) compared with a placebo after prolonged resistance-type exercise training in younger and older subjects. CONCLUSION: Protein supplementation increases muscle mass and strength gains during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in both younger and older subjects.
Authors: R A Fielding; T G Travison; D R Kirn; A Koochek; K F Reid; Å von Berens; H Zhu; S C Folta; J M Sacheck; M E Nelson; C K Liu; A C Åberg; M Nydahl; M Lilja; T Gustafsson; T Cederholm Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: M Tieland; R Franssen; C Dullemeijer; C van Dronkelaar; H Kyung Kim; T Ispoglou; K Zhu; R L Prince; L J C van Loon; L C P G M de Groot Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Christoph Centner; Denise Zdzieblik; Llion Roberts; Albert Gollhofer; Daniel König Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Tatiana Moro; Camille R Brightwell; Rachel R Deer; Ted G Graber; Elfego Galvan; Christopher S Fry; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Karl E Cogan; Mark Evans; Enzo Iuliano; Audrey Melvin; Davide Susta; Karl Neff; Giuseppe De Vito; Brendan Egan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Richard A Winett; Brenda M Davy; Elaina Marinik; Jyoti Savla; Sheila G Winett; Stuart M Phillips; Lesley D Lutes Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Felipe Damas; Stuart M Phillips; Manoel E Lixandrão; Felipe C Vechin; Cleiton A Libardi; Hamilton Roschel; Valmor Tricoli; Carlos Ugrinowitsch Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.078