Literature DB >> 23134206

Many ways to make a novel structure: a new mode of sex comb development in Drosophilidae.

Joel Atallah1, Hideaki Watabe, Artyom Kopp.   

Abstract

On macroevolutionary time scales, the same genes can regulate the development of homologous structures through strikingly different cellular processes. Comparing the development of similar morphological traits in closely related species may help elucidate the evolutionary dissociation between pattern formation and morphogenesis. We address this question by focusing on the interspecific differences in sex comb development in Drosophilids. The sex comb is a recently evolved, male-specific structure composed of modified bristles. Previous work in the obscura and melanogaster species groups (Old World Sophophora) has identified two distinct cellular mechanisms that give rise to nearly identical adult morphologies. Here, we describe sex comb development in a species from a more distantly related lineage, the genus Lordiphosa. Although the expression of key regulatory genes is largely conserved in both clades, the cell behaviors responsible for sex comb formation show major differences between Old World Sophophora and Lordiphosa. We suggest that the many-to-one mapping between development and adult phenotype increases the potential for evolutionary innovations.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23134206     DOI: 10.1111/ede.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  8 in total

1.  Phylogenetic position of the Drosophila fima and dentissima lineages, and the status of the D. melanogaster species group.

Authors:  A Kopp; O Barmina; S R Prigent
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Evolution and development of male-specific leg brushes in Drosophilidae.

Authors:  Kohtaro Tanaka; Olga Barmina; Ammon Thompson; Jonathan H Massey; Bernard Y Kim; Anton Suvorov; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.116

3.  Interspecific variation in sex-specific gustatory organs in Drosophila.

Authors:  Artyom Kopp; Olga Barmina
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.028

4.  Different transcriptional responses by the CRISPRa system in distinct types of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Andrea Ortega-Yáñez; Samantha Cruz-Ruiz; Martha Vázquez; Mario Zurita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Evolution of Drosophila sex comb length illustrates the inextricable interplay between selection and variation.

Authors:  Juan N Malagón; Abha Ahuja; Gabilan Sivapatham; Julian Hung; Jiwon Lee; Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez; Joel Atallah; Rama S Singh; Ellen Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic basis of a violation of Dollo's Law: re-evolution of rotating sex combs in Drosophila bipectinata.

Authors:  Thaddeus D Seher; Chen Siang Ng; Sarah A Signor; Ondrej Podlaha; Olga Barmina; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Anna Mammel; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  A review of the genus Lordiphosa Basden in India, with descriptions of four new species from the Himalayan region (Diptera, Drosophilidae).

Authors:  Rajendra S Fartyal; Pradeep C Sati; Sushmika Pradhan; Mukul C Kandpal; Masanori J Toda; Rabindra N Chatterjee; Birendra K Singh; Asha Bhardwai
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 1.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.