Literature DB >> 23134184

Comparison of liver parenchymal ablation and tissue necrosis in a cadaveric bovine model using the Harmonic Scalpel, the LigaSure, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and the Aquamantys devices.

John S Hammond1, William Muirhead, Abed M Zaitoun, Iain C Cameron, Dileep N Lobo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The amount of tissue that is ablated or necrosed at the line of parenchymal transection is of clinical significance in the interpretation of resection margin status following hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to define the extent of parenchymal ablation and necrosis in liver tissue using the Harmonic Scalpel, the LigaSure, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) and the Aquamantys dissector ex vivo.
METHODS: Mounted blocks of non-perfused bovine liver were transected using the Harmonic Scalpel, LigaSure, CUSA and Aquamantys devices. Outcome measures included parenchymal ablation (ablation band widths and weights) and tissue necrosis band widths along the line of transection. Each experiment was replicated five times.
RESULTS: All devices were associated with parenchymal ablation (Harmonic Scalpel, 4.73 ± 1.62 mm; LigaSure, 4.55 ± 2.02 mm; CUSA, 7.16 ± 2.87 mm; Aquamantys, 4.75 ± 1.43 mm) and tissue necrosis (Harmonic Scalpel, 1.07 ± 0.46 mm; LigaSure, 1.36 ± 0.36 mm; CUSA, 0.81 ± 0.21 mm; Aquamantys, 0.81 ± 0.36 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The Harmonic Scalpel, LigaSure, CUSA and Aquamantys devices were associated with bands of tissue loss along the hepatic parenchymal transection line in this benchtop cadaveric model. This should be taken into account in the interpretation of resection margin status following liver resection.
© 2012 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23134184      PMCID: PMC3521911          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00547.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  30 in total

1.  Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  H Sugo; Y Mikami; F Matsumoto; H Tsumura; Y Watanabe; K Kojima; S Futagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Mithat Gonen; Kathleen Zazzali; Ronald P Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky; Michelle L DeOliveira; Rolf Graf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Current techniques of liver transection.

Authors:  Ronnie T P Poon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Effect of subcentimeter nonpositive resection margin on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Evidences from 663 liver resections.

Authors:  J Figueras; F Burdio; E Ramos; J Torras; L Llado; S Lopez-Ben; A Codina-Barreras; S Mojal
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Comparison between the minimum margin defined on preoperative imaging and the final surgical margin after hepatectomy for cancer: how to manage it?

Authors:  D Elias; S Bonnet; C Honoré; N Kohneh-Shahri; G Tomasic; N Lassau; C Dromain; D Goere
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Resection of colorectal liver metastases: is a resection margin of 3 mm enough? : a multicenter analysis of the GAST Study Group.

Authors:  Ralf Konopke; Stephan Kersting; Frank Makowiec; Peter Gassmann; Eberhard Kuhlisch; Norbert Senninger; Ulrich Hopt; Hans Detlev Saeger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The use of saline-linked radiofrequency dissecting sealer for liver transection in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Feng Xia; Shuguang Wang; Kuansheng Ma; Xiaobing Feng; Yongjie Su; Jiahong Dong
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Junji Yamamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Makoto Seki; Tomoo Kosuge; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Safety analysis of the oncological outcome after vein-preserving surgery for colorectal liver metastases detached from the main hepatic veins.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Italo Bonadio; Peter Smeets; Karen De Paepe; Giammauro Berardi; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Stéphanie Laurent; Louis J Libbrecht; Karen Geboes; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy using the Torsional Ultrasonic Scalpel.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Paraskevas Stamopoulos; Petros Charalampoudis; Ernesto P Molmenti; Athanasios Voutsarakis; Gregory Kouraklis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Authors:  Fernando A Alvarez; Rodrigo Sanchez Claria; Sebastian Oggero; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

4.  Opportunistic use of a Foley catheter to provide a common electrocautery with a water-irrigating channel for hepatic parenchymal transection.

Authors:  Yuzo Yamamoto; Masato Yoshioka; Go Watanabe; Hiroshi Uchinami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Gas jet transection of liver parenchima: experimental research.

Authors:  Valeriy V Boyko; Denys I Skoryi; Oleksandr V Maloshtan; Oleksandr M Tyshchenko; Tatiana V Kozlova; Andriy O Maloshtan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Mathieu D'Hondt; Esther Tamby; Isabelle Boscart; Simon Turcotte; Isabelle Parmentier; Hans Pottel; Réal Lapointe; Sander Ovaere; Franky Vansteenkiste; Franck Vandenbroucke-Menu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of surgical margins on overall and recurrence-free survival in parenchymal-sparing laparoscopic liver resections of colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Federico Tomassini; Stéphanie Laurent; Peter Smeets; Marc De Man; Karen Geboes; Louis J Libbrecht; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Oncological safety of ultrasound-guided laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastases: a case-control study.

Authors:  Serena Langella; Nadia Russolillo; Marco D'Eletto; Fabio Forchino; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-29

9.  Hemostasis in brain tumor surgery using the Aquamantys system.

Authors:  Giovanni Grasso; Filippo Giambartino; Domenico G Iacopino
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-01

10.  Adverse intraoperative events during surgical repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  William R Muirhead; Patrick J Grover; Ahmed K Toma; Danail Stoyanov; Hani J Marcus; Mary Murphy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.