PURPOSE: To investigate changes in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and visual performance following supplementation with different macular carotenoid formulations. METHODS:Thirty-six subjects (19 male, 17 female; mean SD, age 51 13 years) were recruited into this single-masked placebo-controlled study, and were randomly assigned to one of the following three intervention (supplementation) groups: (1) group 1 (20 mg lutein [L] and 2 mg zeaxanthin [Z]); (2) group 2 (10 mg L, 2 mg Z, and 10 mg meso-zeaxanthin [MZ]); and group 3 (placebo). Outcomes measures included visual performance and MPOD response. Data were collected at baseline, at 3 months, and at 6 months. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, a statistically significant increase in MPOD was found at all eccentricities (other than the most peripheral 3° location) in group 2 (P < 0.05 for all), whereas no significant increase in MPOD was demonstrable at any eccentricity for subjects in groups 1 and 3. Statistically significant improvements in visual performance measures including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with and without glare were observed for group 2 only. Only mesopic contrast sensitivity at one spatial frequency improved significantly by 6 months (P < 0.05) for group 1. No improvements in any parameters of visual performance were observed for subjects supplemented with placebo (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that supplementation with all three macular carotenoids potentially offered advantages over preparations lacking MZ, both in terms of MPOD response and visual performance enhancement.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate changes in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and visual performance following supplementation with different macular carotenoid formulations. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (19 male, 17 female; mean SD, age 51 13 years) were recruited into this single-masked placebo-controlled study, and were randomly assigned to one of the following three intervention (supplementation) groups: (1) group 1 (20 mg lutein [L] and 2 mg zeaxanthin [Z]); (2) group 2 (10 mg L, 2 mg Z, and 10 mg meso-zeaxanthin [MZ]); and group 3 (placebo). Outcomes measures included visual performance and MPOD response. Data were collected at baseline, at 3 months, and at 6 months. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, a statistically significant increase in MPOD was found at all eccentricities (other than the most peripheral 3° location) in group 2 (P < 0.05 for all), whereas no significant increase in MPOD was demonstrable at any eccentricity for subjects in groups 1 and 3. Statistically significant improvements in visual performance measures including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with and without glare were observed for group 2 only. Only mesopic contrast sensitivity at one spatial frequency improved significantly by 6 months (P < 0.05) for group 1. No improvements in any parameters of visual performance were observed for subjects supplemented with placebo (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that supplementation with all three macular carotenoids potentially offered advantages over preparations lacking MZ, both in terms of MPOD response and visual performance enhancement.
Authors: R Moran; J M Nolan; J Stack; A M O'Halloran; J Feeney; K O Akuffo; R A Kenny; S Beatty Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Kristin J Meyers; Elizabeth J Johnson; Paul S Bernstein; Sudha K Iyengar; Corinne D Engelman; Chitra K Karki; Zhe Liu; Robert P Igo; Barbara Truitt; Michael L Klein; D Max Snodderly; Barbara A Blodi; Karen M Gehrs; Gloria E Sarto; Robert B Wallace; Jennifer Robinson; Erin S LeBlanc; Gregory Hageman; Lesley Tinker; Julie A Mares Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Paul S Bernstein; Binxing Li; Preejith P Vachali; Aruna Gorusupudi; Rajalekshmy Shyam; Bradley S Henriksen; John M Nolan Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Binxing Li; Gregory T Rognon; Ty Mattinson; Preejith P Vachali; Aruna Gorusupudi; Fu-Yen Chang; Arunkumar Ranganathan; Kelly Nelson; Evan W George; Jeanne M Frederick; Paul S Bernstein Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2018-05-06 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Hans Konrad Biesalski; John W Erdman; John Hathcock; Kathleen Ellwood; Stephen Beatty; Elizabeth Johnson; Roberto Marchioli; Lotte Lauritzen; Harry B Rice; Andrew Shao; James C Griffiths Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 5.614