Literature DB >> 23132231

"5 mins of uncomfyness is better than dealing with cancer 4 a lifetime": an exploratory qualitative analysis of cervical and breast cancer screening dialogue on Twitter.

Courtney R Lyles1, Andrea López, Rena Pasick, Urmimala Sarkar.   

Abstract

Twitter.com is a "micro-blogging" website. Although Twitter use is growing rapidly, little is known about health behavior discussions on this site, even though a majority of messages are publicly available. We retrieved publicly available Twitter messages during a 5-week period in early 2012, searching separately for the terms "Pap smear" and "mammogram." We used content analysis to code each 140-character message, generating a separate coding framework for each cancer screening term and calculating the frequencies of comments. Using the brief account description, we also coded the author as individual, organization, or news media outlet. There were 203 Pap smear and 271 mammogram messages coded, over three fourths of which were from individual accounts. Overall, 22 % of Pap smear messages and 25 % of mammogram messages discussed personal experiences, including attending appointments, negative sentiment about the procedure, and results. Other messages from both individuals and organizations (8 % Pap smear, 18 % mammogram) promoted screening. About one quarter of the messages expressed personal experiences with cancer screening. This demonstrates that Twitter can be a rich source of information and could be used to design new health-related interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23132231     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0432-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  17 in total

1.  Satisfaction and anxiety for women during investigation of an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  T Gregory Hislop; Susan R Harris; Jeremy Jackson; Sally E Thorne; Eunice J Rousseau; Andrew J Coldman; Judith A Vestrup; Charles J Wright; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Social networks--are they good for your health? The era of Facebook and Twitter.

Authors:  R Rajani; D S Berman; A Rozanski
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2011-06-03

3.  Personal meaning of human papillomavirus and Pap test results in adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Jessica A Kahn; Gail B Slap; David I Bernstein; Abbigail M Tissot; Linda M Kollar; Paula A Hillard; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Pain predicts non-adherence to pap smear screening among middle-aged African American women.

Authors:  Cathrine Hoyo; Kimberly S H Yarnall; Celette Sugg Skinner; Patricia G Moorman; Denethia Sellers; LaVerne Reid
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Anticipated shame and worry following an abnormal Pap test result: the impact of information about HPV.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Laura A V Marlow; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Pap smear receipt among Vietnamese immigrants: the importance of health care factors.

Authors:  Victoria M Taylor; Yutaka Yasui; Tung T Nguyen; Erica Woodall; H Hoai Do; Elizabeth Acorda; Lin Li; John Choe; J Carey Jackson
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.

Authors:  Carleen Hawn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  When a usual source of care and usual provider matter: adult prevention and screening services.

Authors:  Lynn A Blewett; Pamela Jo Johnson; Brian Lee; Peter B Scal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Alessio Signorini; Alberto Maria Segre; Philip M Polgreen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication.

Authors:  Wen-ying Sylvia Chou; Yvonne M Hunt; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  29 in total

1.  Facts or stories? How to use social media for cervical cancer prevention: A multi-method study of the effects of sender type and content type on increased message sharing.

Authors:  Jingwen Zhang; Gem Le; David Larochelle; Rena Pasick; George F Sawaya; Urmimala Sarkar; Damon Centola
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Big Data in Science and Healthcare: A Review of Recent Literature and Perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  M M Hansen; T Miron-Shatz; A Y S Lau; C Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews.

Authors:  Byron C Wallace; Michael J Paul; Urmimala Sarkar; Thomas A Trikalinos; Mark Dredze
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A Cross-Sectional Review of Cervical Cancer Messages on Twitter During Cervical Cancer Awareness Month.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rida Shaikh; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Taylor Zoellner; Linda Carson; Shalini Kulasingam; Emil Lou
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Breast Cancer Screening and Social Media: a Content Analysis of Evidence Use and Guideline Opinions on Twitter.

Authors:  Anthony Nastasi; Tyler Bryant; Joseph K Canner; Mark Dredze; Melissa S Camp; Neeraja Nagarajan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Tweeting it off: characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt.

Authors:  Sherry Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Martinus Evans; Molly E Waring; Brad Appelhans; Andrew M Busch; Matthew C Whited; Herpreet Thind; Michelle Ziedonis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT PUBLIC HEALTH FROM ONLINE CROWD SURVEILLANCE.

Authors:  Shawndra Hill; Raina Merchant; Lyle Ungar
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.128

8.  The association between social media use for health related information and compliance with breast and cervical cancer screenings.

Authors:  HyounKyoung G Park; Young-Il Kim; Warner K Huh; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Res Rep (Montgomery, Ala.)       Date:  2020-05-07

9.  Social Media and Men's Health: A Content Analysis of Twitter Conversations During the 2013 Movember Campaigns in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Caroline A Bravo; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-12-14

Review 10.  Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexis Koskan; Lynne Klasko; Stacy N Davis; Clement K Gwede; Kristen J Wells; Ambuj Kumar; Natalia Lopez; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.