Literature DB >> 23131193

Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears--incidence and risk factors.

Nir Melamed1, Oz Gavish, Michal Eisner, Arnon Wiznitzer, Nir Wasserberg, Yariv Yogev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears (34DPT), and to identify subgroups of women who are at especially high risk for 34DPT.
METHODS: A cohort study of women who underwent vaginal delivery in a single tertiary medical center between 1999 and 2011, (58 937 deliveries). Women diagnosed with 34DPT following delivery were compared to control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and tree classification analysis were used to identify combinations of risk factors which were associated with considerable risk for 34DPT.
RESULTS: Overall, 356 (0.6%) deliveries were complicated by 34DPT (340 (95.5%) third-degree tears and 16 (4.5%) fourth-degree tears). Independent predictors of 34DPT were: forceps delivery (odds ratio (OR) = 5.5, confidence interval (CI) 3.9-7.8), precipitate labor (OR = 5.2, CI 2.9-9.2), persistent occiput posterior position (OR = 2.6, CI 1.6-4.3), vacuum extraction (OR = 1.9, CI 1.4-2.6) as well as large for gestational age (LGA) infant and gestational age > 40 weeks. Fourth-degree tears were associated with forceps delivery (OR = 12.5, CI 2.3-66.2), precipitate labor (OR = 9.7, 95%-CI 1.2-75.4) and LGA infant (OR = 7.4, 95%-CI 1.7 -1.5). Overall, the predictability of 34DPT was limited (R(2 )= 0.4). In subgroups of women with certain combinations of risk factors the risk of 34DPT ranged from 10% to 25%.
CONCLUSION: Despite the limited predictability of 34DPT by individual risk factors, the use of combinations of risk factors may assist obstetricians in identifying women who are at especially high risk for 34DPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23131193     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.746308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

1.  Structured hands-on workshop decreases the over-detection rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Haim Krissi; Amir Aviram; Liran Hiersch; Eran Ashwal; Ram Eitan; Yoav Peled
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in twin deliveries: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Hadar Rosen; Jon Barrett; Rania Okby; Ori Nevo; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Influence of the duration of the second stage of labor on the likelihood of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Andrew Prentice
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Risk of adverse outcomes among infants of immigrant women according to birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Howard Berger; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs) in Israel: A Review of the Incidence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Shimon Ginath; Yossi Mizrachi; Jacob Bar; Alexander Condrea; Michal Kovo
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Urgent EMS managed out-of-hospital delivery dispatches in Helsinki.

Authors:  Jussi Pirneskoski; Katja Peräjoki; Mika Nuutila; Markku Kuisma
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.