Literature DB >> 25439012

Influence of the duration of the second stage of labor on the likelihood of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Catherine E Aiken1, Abigail R Aiken, Andrew Prentice.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duration of the second stage of labor has been suggested as an independent risk factor for clinically detectable obstetric anal sphincter injury in low-risk nulliparous women.
METHODS: A retrospective 5-year cohort study was conducted in a UK obstetrics center which included a high-risk delivery unit and a low-risk birthing center. The study included 4,831 nulliparous women with vertex-presenting, single, live-born infants at term, stratified according to spontaneous or instrumental delivery. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the association between duration of second stage and sphincter injury.
RESULTS: Three-hundred twenty-five of 4,831 women (6.7%) sustained sphincter injuries. In spontaneously delivering women, no association between duration of the second stage and the likelihood of sphincter injury was recorded. Factors associated with increased likelihood of sphincter injury included older maternal age, higher birthweight, and Southeast Asian ethnicity. In contrast, for women undergoing instrumental delivery, a longer second stage was associated with an increased sphincter injury risk of 6 percent per 15 minutes in the second stage of labor before delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: For spontaneous vaginal deliveries, duration of the second stage of labor was not an independent risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. The association between prolonged second stage and sphincter injury for instrumental deliveries is likely explained by the risk posed by the use of the instruments themselves or by delay in initiating instrumental assistance. Attempts to modify the duration of the second stage for prevention of sphincter injuries are unlikely to be beneficial and may be detrimental.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstetric anal sphincter injury; second stage of labor; vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25439012      PMCID: PMC4329065          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  31 in total

Review 1.  Short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury and their management.

Authors:  Myra Fitzpatrick; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations.

Authors:  Linda M Hopkins; Aaron B Caughey; David V Glidden; Russell K Laros
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Molly R Altman; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  M Eogan; L Daly; P R O'Connell; C O'Herlihy
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alison J Macarthur; Colin Macarthur
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vasanth Andrews; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar; Peter W Jones
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Ladislas Faltin; Michel Boulvain; Lucia Angela Floris; Olivier Irion
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The effect of epidural analgesia on rates of episiotomy use and episiotomy extension in an inner-city hospital.

Authors:  M G Newman; M K Lindsay; W Graves
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med       Date:  2001-04

9.  Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries.

Authors:  Anny Spydslaug; Lill I S Trogstad; Anders Skrondal; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Perineal body length and lacerations at delivery.

Authors:  Shad H Deering; Nicole Carlson; Michael Stitely; Alexander D Allaire; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Ciara E Nolan; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?

Authors:  Sara S Webb; Karla Hemming; Madhi Y Khalfaoui; Tine Brink Henriksen; Sara Kindberg; Stine Stensgaard; Christine Kettle; Khaled M K Ismail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.894

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.