Literature DB >> 23130821

Low suspicion lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict for the absence of high-risk prostate cancer.

Nitin K Yerram1, Dmitry Volkin, Baris Turkbey, Jeffrey Nix, Anthony N Hoang, Srinivas Vourganti, Gopal N Gupta, W Marston Linehan, Peter L Choyke, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Over-treatment of indolent prostate cancer lesions is a problem which can result in increased human and medical costs. Lesions with a low suspician level at mpMRI of the prostate have low risk of including high risk prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has the potential to identify patients at low risk for cancer, thus obviating the need for biopsy. Prostate cancer is currently diagnosed by random biopsies, resulting in the discovery of multiple low-risk cancers that often lead to overtreatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 800 consecutive patients who underwent a 3 Tesla mpMRI of the prostate with an endorectal coil from March 2007 to November 2011. All suspicious lesions were independently reviewed by two radiologists using T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, spectroscopic and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. Patients with only low suspicion lesions (maximum of two positive parameters on mpMRI) who subsequently underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)/MRI fusion targeted biopsy were selected for analysis.
RESULTS: In total, 125 patients with only low suspicion prostatic lesions on mpMRI were identified. On TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy, 77 (62%) of these patients had no cancer detected, 38 patients had Gleason 6 disease and 10 patients had Gleason 7 (3+4) disease. There were 30 patients with cancer detected on biopsy who qualified for active surveillance using 2011 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. No cases of high-risk (≥ Gleason 4+3) cancer were identified on biopsy and, of the fifteen patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution, none were pathologically upgraded to high-risk cancer. Thus, for patients with only low suspicion lesions, 107 (88%) patients either had no cancer or clinically insignificant disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in the present study show that low suspicion lesions on mpMRI are associated with either negative biopsies or low-grade tumours suitable for active surveillance. Such patients have a low risk of harbouring high-risk prostate cancers.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL; NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL US GOVERNMENT WORKS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130821      PMCID: PMC3808160          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11646.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  22 in total

1.  Further support for active surveillance in the management of low-volume, low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter Albertsen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Kirkham; Manit Arya; Rowland Illing; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  D'Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Paul H Chung; Juan M Proano; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna Shih; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Vijay P Shah; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Angelo A Baccala; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Maria J Merino; Joanna H Shih; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Overuse of imaging for staging low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wesley W Choi; Stephen B Williams; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Paul L Nguyen; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Joan F Hilton; Adam C Reese; Harras B Zaid; Sima P Porten; Katsuto Shinohara; Maxwell V Meng; Kirsten L Greene; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Estimation of prostate size in community-dwelling men.

Authors:  Debra J Jacobson; Jennifer L St Sauver; Alexander S Parker; Michaela E McGree; Aruna V Sarma; Cynthia J Girman; Michael M Lieber; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Baris Turkbey; Neil Glossop; Anurag K Singh; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-09
View more
  38 in total

1.  Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Iqbal Sahibzada; Deepak Batura; Giles Hellawell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.

Authors:  M Kongnyuy; M M Siddiqui; A K George; A Muthigi; A Sidana; M Maruf; B Turkbey; P L Choyke; B J Wood; P A Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  [Fusion imaging in urology: combination of MRI and TRUS for detection of prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Schilling; M Kurosch; R Mager; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp; M Röthke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Long-term differences in urinary, bowel and sexual function among men treated with surgery versus radiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin D Ellett; James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Ruling out clinically significant prostate cancer with negative multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Julie Y An; Abhinav Sidana; Sarah A Holzman; Joseph A Baiocco; Sherif Mehralivand; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Natural history of small index lesions suspicious for prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: recommendations for interval imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Barış Türkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Anthony N Hoang; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Lambros Stamatakis; Hong Truong; Jeffrey W Nix; Srinivas Vourganti; Kinzya B Grant; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Efficiency of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis by MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy vs Standard Extended-Sextant Biopsy for MR-Visible Lesions.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Rachel Rubin; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Howard L Parnes; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.