Literature DB >> 23130820

Analytical thresholds and sensitivity: establishing RFU thresholds for forensic DNA analysis.

Joli Bregu1, Danielle Conklin, Elisse Coronado, Margaret Terrill, Robin W Cotton, Catherine M Grgicak.   

Abstract

Determining appropriate analytical thresholds (ATs) for forensic DNA analysis is critical to maximize allele detection. In this study, six methods to determine ATs for forensic DNA purposes were examined and compared. Four of the methods rely on analysis of the baseline noise of a number of negatives, while two utilize the relationship between relative fluorescence unit signal and DNA input in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) derived from a dilution series ranging from 1 to 0.06 ng. Results showed that when a substantial mass of DNA (i.e., >1 ng) was amplified, the baseline noise increased, suggesting the application of an AT derived from negatives should only be applied to samples with low levels of DNA. Further, the number and intensity of these noise peaks increased with increasing injection times, indicating that to maximize the ability to detect alleles, ATs should be validated for each post-PCR procedure employed.
© 2012 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130820     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  4 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of Illumina's forensic STR and SNP kits on MiSeq FGx™.

Authors:  Vishakha Sharma; Hoi Yan Chow; Donald Siegel; Elisa Wurmbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A technique for setting analytical thresholds in massively parallel sequencing-based forensic DNA analysis.

Authors:  Brian Young; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle; Luigi Armogida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Validation of reduced volume VeriFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit for buccal swab samples extracted using Prep-n-Go™ Buffer.

Authors:  Jessica Perry; Tasnim Munshi; Thomas Haizel; Sasitaran Iyavoo
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.717

4.  Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods.

Authors:  Michele Ragazzo; Stefania Carboni; Valerio Caputo; Carlotta Buttini; Laura Manzo; Valeria Errichiello; Giulio Puleri; Emiliano Giardina
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.